Subscribe

Subscribe to our Newsletter and get informed about new publication regulary and special discounts for subscribers!

JHPR > JHPR Volume 6 > Yield and Yield Related Parameters of Tomato...
< Back to Volume

Yield and Yield Related Parameters of Tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.) Treated with Paclobutrazol at Different Stages in North West Ethiopia

Full Text PDF

Abstract:

The effects of Paclobutrazol (PBZ) on fruit yield of tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.) were investigated by spraying it on tomato seedlings grown in an open field. The treatments were 5 x 2 factorial combinations including five rates of PBZ (control, 1 kg ha-1, 2 kg ha-1, 3 kg ha-1 and 4 kg ha-1) and two times of application (at 2 to 4 and 6 to 8 true leaf growth stages of tomato seedlings), arranged in a Randomized Complete Block Design, each treatment replicated three times. The objective of the study was to characterize the effect of rate and time of application of PBZ on the yield and yield related parameters of tomato. Time and rate of application of PBZ significantly increased harvest index, yield concentration and index of economic earliness, and decreased fruit set percentage, pericarp thickness, fruit diameter and percentage of class one fruit. Irrespective of the time of application, an increase in the rate of PBZ compared to the control significantly increased days to fruit maturity. Time and rate of application of PBZ were significantly interacted to increase; unmarketable fruit yield but decrease means fruit weight. Compared to the control, the interaction effects also produced two significant trends of variations on fruit yield per plant, fruit dry weight per plant, marketable fruit yield and total fruit yield. Significant reduction in yields was observed for diluted concentrations like 1 and 2 kg/ha a.i. of PBZ in the second time of application and 1 kg/ha a.i. of PBZ in the first time of application, whereas all other treatments produced significantly higher yields than the controls. On the contrary, time and rate of application of PBZ were found to be effective in improving economic earliness of tomato. As a whole, time and rate of application of PBZ resulted in two significant trends of variations (increasing and decreasing) on fruit yields of tomato. Hence, it could be possible to propose that more assimilate reallocation to the fruits are significant advantage of PBZ treatments contributing to the improvement of seedling quality at planting for increased seedling survival rate, better stress protection, early and more fruit production.

Info:

Periodical:
Journal of Horticulture and Plant Research (Volume 6)
Pages:
37-46
Citation:
W. Endegena, "Yield and Yield Related Parameters of Tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.) Treated with Paclobutrazol at Different Stages in North West Ethiopia", Journal of Horticulture and Plant Research, Vol. 6, pp. 37-46, 2019
Online since:
April 2019
Export:
Distribution:
References:

[1] Asia vegetable research and development center (AVRDC). Proc. of the first international symposium on tropical tomato, Oct. 23-27, 1978 at Shanhua, Taiwan, Republic of China, 1979, pp.5-10.

[2] J.G. Atherton, J. Rudich, The Tomato Crop, Chapman Hall Ltd. London, New York, 1986, p.647.

[3] H. Bevora, Z. Zlatev, Physiological response and yield of paclobutrazol treated tomato plants (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.), Plant Growth Regul. 30 (2000) 117-123.

[4] Frost and Kretchman, Use of growth retardant to improve ripening uniformity and yield of processing tomatoes, HortScience. 22 (1987) 422-423.

[5] P. Hedden, Inhibition of geberellin biosynthesis by paclobutrazol in cell free homogenates of Curcurbita maxima endosperm and malus pumila embryos, J. Plant Growth Regul. 4 (1985) 111-122.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02266949

[6] L.C. Ho, Partitioning of assimilates in fruiting tomato plant, Plant Growth Regul. 2 (1984) 277-285.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00027287

[7] D. Lemma, Seed production guideline for tomatoes, onion and hot pepper, IAR. Addis Ababa., 1998, p.22.

[8] D. Lemma, Z. Yayeh, E. Herath, Agronomic Studies in Tomato and Capsicum. In; Herath and Lemma (eds). Horticulture Research and Development in Ethiopia. 1-3 December. Addis Ababa, Ethiopia, 1992, pp.153-163.

[9] D. Merlo, A. Soldati, E.R. Keller, Influence of growth regulators in abscision of flower and young pods of soybean, Erosoya. 5 (1987) 31-38.

[10] M.D. Orzolek, Use of growth retardant for tomato transplant production, Appl. Agr. Res. 1 (1986) 168-171.

[11] H. E. Park, J. M. Lee, The effect of growth regulator treatments on growth and other characterstics of pepper (Capsicum spp.), Korean Soc. Hort. Sci. 7 (1989) 40-41.

[12] A.M. Pelacho et al., In vitro tuberization of potato: Effect of several morphogenic regulators in light and darkness, J. Plant Physiol. 144 (1994) 705-709.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/s0176-1617(11)80665-6

[13] R.C. Setia, G. Bhatal, N. Setia., Influence of paclobutrazol on growth and yield of Brasica carinata A, Plant Growth Regul. 16 (1999) 121-127.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00029532

[14] I. Simko, Effects of paclobutrazol on in vitro formation of potato micro-tubers and their sprouting after storage, Biol. Plant 36 (1994) 15-20.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02921262

[15] V. Souza-Machado et al., Enhancement of tomato seedling quality involving triazole seed priming seedling nutrient loading and subsequent effect on harvest yield and quality. Report Ontario. Tomato Seedling Growers Marketing Board in Canada, (1996).

[16] T. Tekalign, P.S. Hammes, Reponse of potato growth under noninductive condition to paclobutrazol. Shoot growth, chlorophyll content, net photosynthesis, assimilate partitioning, tuber yield, quality and dormancy, Plant Growth Regul. 43 (2005) 227-236.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/b:grow.0000045992.98746.8d

[17] T.D. Davis, E.A. Curry, G.L. Steffens, Chemical regulation of vegetative growth, Critical Reviews in Plant Sciences. 10(2) (1991) 151-188.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/07352689109382310

[18] L.H. Zhu et al., Changes ofleaf water potential and endogenous cytokinins in young apple treestreated with or without paclobutrazol under drought conditions, Sciences Horticulturae Amsterdam. 99(2) (2004) 133–141.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/s0304-4238(03)00089-x

[19] L.C. Ho, Metabolism and compartmentation of imported sugars in sink organs in relation to sink strength, Annual Review of Plant Physiology and Plant Molecular Biology. 39 (1988) 355–378.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.arplant.39.1.355

[20] L.C. Ho, R.I. Grange, A.F. Shaw, Sourcesink regulation, in: D.A. Baker, J.A. Milburn (Eds.), Transport of Photoassimilates, New York: Longman, 1989, pp.306-343.

Show More Hide
Cited By:

[1] L. Juárez-Rodríguez, M. Pérez-Grajales, R. Castro-Brindis, A. Segura-Miranda, N. Magaña-Lira, J. Magdaleno-Villar, "Evaluación de dosis, periodos de aplicación y residualidad de paclobutrazol en tomate", Bioagro, Vol. 34, p. 63, 2021

DOI: https://doi.org/10.51372/bioagro341.6