Subscribe to our Newsletter and get informed about new publication regulary and special discounts for subscribers!

JHPR > JHPR Volume 6 > Effect of Abiotic Stress on Irrigated Maize Forage...
< Back to Volume

Effect of Abiotic Stress on Irrigated Maize Forage Yield as Compared to Sorghum

Full Text PDF


A study was conducted in Sudan (Africa) during the summer and winter seasons (2013 – 2014) at two locations: Shambat (normal soils) and Soba (salt affected soils). Nine maize (Zea mays L.) and sorghum (Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench) cultivars were studied under two watering regimes arranged in split plot experiment in randomized complete block design. The eight test-environments created by the combination of locations, seasons and watering regimes were used to investigate the effect of salt, water and heat stresses on forage yield and some related traits. The results showed that separate and combined stress factors significantly reduced forage yield. The greatest reduction in dry matter yield caused by one factor was shown by salt stress (29.6%) and the least reduction was caused by heat stress (3.9%). Water stress coupled with either heat or salt stress caused the greater reduction in yield (37.0%-43.3%) than the combination of the other factors. Full stress caused 53.8% yield reduction. Days to tasseling was significantly reduced by heat stress whereas water and salt stress showed no significant effect on tasseling duration. Full stress caused the greatest effect on days to tasseling. Plant height and stem diameter were significantly reduced by salt and water stress. Two hybrids kept top rank in yield through most abiotic stress levels showing resilience to unfavorable environments. All maize genotypes significantly outyielded the sorghum check under no heat stress (winter sowing) regardless the effect of salt and water stresses while the opposite is true under the heat stress (summer sowing). It was concluded that salt and water stress are the major abiotic stresses limiting forage maize production. Maize tolerate better reduction in temperature than dose sorghum while the latter tolerate better salt and water stresses than dose maize. Forage maize could be competitively grown during summer if water and salt stresses are avoided


Journal of Horticulture and Plant Research (Volume 6)
S.H. Mohammed and M. I. Mohammed, "Effect of Abiotic Stress on Irrigated Maize Forage Yield as Compared to Sorghum", Journal of Horticulture and Plant Research, Vol. 6, pp. 27-36, 2019
Online since:
April 2019

[1] L.J. Anil, R.H. Phipps, The potential of forage-maize intercrops in ruminant nutrition, Animal Feed Science and Technology. 85 (2000) 157-164.


[2] J.A. Cusicanqui, J.G. Lauer, Plant density and hybrid influence on corn forage yield and quality, Agro. J. 91 (1999) 911-915.


[3] M. Koutsika- Sotiriou, Hybrid seed production in maize, in: A.S. Basra (Ed.), Heterosis and hybrid seed production in agronomic crops, Food Products Press, NewYork, 1999, pp.25-64.

[4] M. Cooper et al., Breeding drought-tolerant maize hybrids for the US corn-belt: Discovery to product, J. Exp. Bot. (2014)..

[5] I. Ahuja, R.C. de Vos A.M. Bones, Plant molecular stress responses face climate change, Trends Plant Sci. 15 (2010) 664–674.


[6] R. Ngara, R. Ndimba J.B. Jensen, Identification and profiling of salinity stress-responsive proteins in Sorghum bicolor seedlings, J. Proteomics. 75 (2012) 4139–4150.


[7] W. Schlenker, M.J. Roberts, Nonlinear temperature effects indicate severe damages to U.S. crop yields under climate change, Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA. 106 (2009) 15594–15598.


[8] J.D. Oster, R. C. Reeve M. Fireman, Salt problems in relation to irrigation, In: Irrigation of agricultural lands (ed. by R. M. Hagen), Agronomy J. 11 (1967) 988-1008.


[9] K. H. Amer, Corn crop response under managing different irrigation and salinity levels, Agric. Water Manage. 97 (2010)1553-1563.


[10] FAO, The use of saline waters for crop production - FAO irrigation and drainage paper 48, Available: (2000).

[11] A.B. Elahmadi, A.B. Elahmadi, A proposal for the release of two maize hybrids for the irrigated central clays of Sudan, A paper submitted to the Variety Release Committee, Khartoum, Sudan. (2012) 1-12.

[12] A.E. Kambal, Comparative performance of some varieties of sorghum, maize and pearl millet for forage production, Sudan Agricultural Journal. 10 (1984) 46-60.

[13] W.G. Cochran, G.M. Cox, Experimental designs, 2nd edn. John Wiley and Sons, Inc. New York. (1957) 293-316.

[14] Genstat, Ninth edition. Version – Agricultural Trust (Rothamsted Experimental Station) VSN International, Hertfordshire (2011).

[15] B. Bojović et al., Effects of NaCl on seed germination in some species from families Brassicaceae and Solanaceae, Kragujevac Journal of Science. 32 (2010) 83-87.

[16] FAO, FAOSTAT, Food and Agricultural Organization of the United National (2011).

[17] I.S. Afzal et al., Improving germination and seedling vigour in wheat by haloprimingunder saline conditions, Pakistan Journal of Agricultural Sciences. 44 (2007) 40– 49.

[18] R. Munns, Comparative physiology of salt and water stress, Plant Cell Environ. 25 (2002) 239-250.

[19] J.O. Payero et al., Effect of timing of a deficit–irrigation allocation on corn evapotranspiration, yield, water use efficiency and dry mass, Agricultural Water Management. 96 (2009) 1387–1397.


[20] M.B. Khan, H.A. Nazim, I.B. Muammad, Effect of water stress on growth and yield component of maize varieties, Research science. 12 (2001) 15-18.

[21] FAO, Crop water requirements under arid condition, Dallyn. P.M, more food from better technology, Rome. (1983) 383-392.

[22] H.E. Elawad, Growth and Production of Maize (Zea mays L.) as Affected by Water Treatment, Organic and Inorganic Fertilizers M. Sc. Thesis, Faculty of Agric. U. of K., Sudan. (2007).

[23] M.A. Ibrahiem et al., Proceedings of the Meetings of the National Crop Husbandry Committee  39th, Agricultural Research Corporation, Wad Medani, Sudan. (2005) 105-125.

[24] M. Ashraf, M. Hafeez, Thermo tolerance of pearl millet and maize at early growth stages: growth and nutrient relations, Biol. Plant. 48 (2004) 81-86.


[25] R.S. Dubey, Photosynthesis in plants under stressful conditions, in: M. Pessarakli (Ed.), Handbook of Photosynthesis, 2nd edition, CRC press, Boca Roton, Florida, 2005, pp.717-737.

[26] S. H. Kim et al., Temperature dependence of growth, development and photosynthesis in maize under elevated CO2, Environ. Exp. Bot. 61 (2007) 224-236.

[27] A. Wahid et al., Heat tolerance in plants: An overview, Environ. Exp. Bot. 61 (2007) 199–223.

[28] Z. Ristic et al., Rubisco activase and wheat productivity under heat stress conditions, J. Exp. Bot. 60 (2009) 4003-404.

[29] T. Hussain et al., Breeding potential for high temperature tolerance in corn (Zea mays L.), Pakistan J. Bot. 38 (2006) 1185–1195.

[30] K. L. Smith, Ohio Agron. Guide, Corn prod. Ohio state Univ. USA, bulletin: 472, Steel, R. G. D., Torrie J. H., Deekey. D. A., 1997. Principles and procedures of Statistics, A Biometrical Approach, 3rd ED. Mc Graw Hill Book, Int. Co. New York. (1996) 400-428.

[31] R.W. Heiniger, The impact of early drought on corn yield. Raleigh, NC: North Carolina State University. (2001) Available:

[32] M. I. Mohammed et al., A proposal for the release of two Egyptian maize hybrids for the irrigated sector in Northern and Central Sudan, A paper submitted to the Variety Release Committee, Khartoum, Sudan. (2013) 1-16.

[33] E.V. Maas, G.J. Hoffman, Crop salt tolerance - current assessment, Journal of the Irrigation and Drainage. 103 ( 1977) 115–134.

Show More Hide
Cited By:
This article has no citations.