Subscribe

Subscribe to our Newsletter and get informed about new publication regulary and special discounts for subscribers!

ILSHS > ILSHS Volume 89 > Passion and Reason in Charlotte Brontë’s Jane...
< Back to Volume

Passion and Reason in Charlotte Brontë’s Jane Eyre and Irigarayan Feminine Divine

Full Text PDF

Abstract:

This paper examines Charlotte Brontë’s masterpiece Jane Eyre (1848) through Irigaray’s notion of feminine divine in order to argue how Charlotte Brontë’s main characters achieve their autonomous gendered identity by expressing their erotic desire. It discusses the resistance of Charlotte Brontë’s female protagonist, Jane Eyre, to the dichotomies of active subject/passive object, self/other, body/mind, passion/intellect, and the domination/submission through her ethical and intersubjective relationship with Rochester, her counterpart, rather than being an object of his desire. It is argued how Jane challenges these dualities of patriarchal society and the logic of the same by expressing her erotic nature. Where the patriarchal society tries to confine women in the patriarchal culture, Brontë develops Jane within and against those confines and allows her to experience her female desire by exploring the internal and external nature. Jane’s liberation from the dualities can be read through the lens of Irigaray’s feminine divine which focuses on women’s autonomous gendered identity and creates a balance between their passion and reason. Charlotte Brontë indicates how women are able to achieve individuality, social standing, and subjective identity by expressing their female desire.

Info:

Periodical:
International Letters of Social and Humanistic Sciences (Volume 89)
Pages:
25-32
Citation:
S. Hemmati, "Passion and Reason in Charlotte Brontë’s Jane Eyre and Irigarayan Feminine Divine", International Letters of Social and Humanistic Sciences, Vol. 89, pp. 25-32, 2020
Online since:
December 2020
Authors:
Export:
Distribution:
References:

[1] Bloom, Harold (2006). Charlotte Brontë's Jane Eyre. Infobase Publishing.

[2] De Groot, Caroline (2012). Equal We Are – Jane Eyre Versus the Victorian Woman. GRIN Verlag.

[3] Glen, Heather (1999). Charlotte Brontë: The Imagination in History. Cambridge: Cambridge UP.

[4] Gilbert, Sandra M, and Susan Gubar (1979). The Madwoman in the Attic: The Woman Writer and the Nineteenth-Century Literary Imagination. New Haven: Yale Univ. Press.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvxkn74x

[5] Fraser, Rebecca (2012). Charlotte Brontë. Random House.

[6] Imlay, Elizabeth (1993). Charlotte Brontë and the Mysteries of Love: Myth and Allegory in Jane Eyre. Parapress Limited.

[7] Irigaray, Luce (1985a). This Sex Which is Not One. Ithaca: Cornell University Press. (1985b). The Speculum of the Other Woman. Trans. G. C. Gill, Ithaca: Cornell University Press. (1993). An Ethics of Sexual Difference. Trans. Carolyn Burk and Gillian Gill. Ithaca: Cornell University Press. (1996). I Love to You. Trans. Stephen Pluhacek. New York: Columbia UP. (2002). To Be Two. Trans. Monique M. Rhodes and Marco F. Cocito-Monoc. New York: Routledge. (2004). Key Writings. London: Continuum, 2004., and Mary Green, eds (2008). Luce Irigaray: Teaching. Continuum International Publishing Group.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/429259

[8] LaMonaca, Maria B (1999). Paradise Deferred: Religion, Domesticity, and Realism in the Victorian Novel. Indiana University.

[9] Lanser, Susan Sniader (1992). Fictions of Authority: Women Writers and Narrative Voice. Cornell University Press.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.7591/9781501723087

[10] Mitchell, Judith (1994). The Stone and the Scorpion: The Female Subject of Desire in the Novels of Charlotte Brontë, George Eliot, and Thomas Hardy. Westport, Conn., Greenwood Press.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.5860/choice.32-4357

[11] Mitchell, Sally (1981). The Fallen Angel: Chastity, Class, and Women's Reading, 1835-1880. Bowling Green University Popular Press, Ohio.

[12] Moglen, Helen (1976). Charlotte Brontë: the Self Conceived. London: Univ. of Wisconsin Press.

[13] Mulder, Anne-Claire (2006). Divine Flesh, Embodied word: Incarnation as a Hermeneutical Key to a Feminist Theologian. Amsterdam University Press.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.5117/9789085551010

[14] Nestor, Pauline (1987). Charlotte Brontë (Women Writers). Houndmills: Macmillan Education Ltd.

[15] Noble, Andrew (1983). Burns, Blake, and Romantic Revolt., The Art of Robert Burns. Eds. RDS Jack and Andrew Noble. London and Tottowa: Visions Press and Barnes & Noble Books, 191-214.

[16] Nudd, Donna Marie (1993). Rediscovering Jane Eyre through Its Adaptations." Approaches to Teaching Brontë,s Jane Eyre. Ed. Diane Long Hoeveler and Beth Lau. New York: MLA, 139-47.

[17] Pell, Nancy (1977). Resistance, Rebellion, and Marriage: The Economics of Jane Eyre., Nineteenth Century Fiction 31, 397-420.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1525/ncl.1977.31.4.99p0458o

[18] Rickett, Arthur Compton (1978). A History of English Literature. Universal Book Stall, Kanpur.

[19] Santos, Jennifer (2002). Charlotte Brontë's Jane Eyre: Working to Escape Feminine Exile. Ph.D. thesis. Arizona State University.

[20] Showalter, Elain (1977). A Literature of Their Own: British Women Novelists from Brontë to Lessing. Princeton: Princeton UP.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv173f0v7

[21] Singh, S.N., ed (1987). Charlotte Brontë: A Thematic Study of Her Novels. Mittal Publications.

[22] Stockton, Kathryn Bond (1994). God Between Their Lips: Desire Between Women in Irigaray, Brontë, and Eliot. Stanford University Press.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/135583589600300511
Show More Hide
Cited By:
This article has no citations.