Subscribe to our Newsletter and get informed about new publication regulary and special discounts for subscribers!

ILSHS > ILSHS Volume 87 > The Spillover Effect of the EU Economy on the...
< Back to Volume

The Spillover Effect of the EU Economy on the Culture

Full Text PDF


The Economy has always been considered an essential pillar of the development. This is why, when the European Union appeared, the idea of a community based on economic relations with the purpose of empowering the common economy seemed to be an attractive idea to the outside states of the European Economic Community. Even at first, the idea of empowering the Economy was a very good one, after politics, culture, agriculture, science, and other domains were directly linked to the economic development, the Economy was seen as the nucleus of development of all. Giving its role, we are asking ourselves: Is the Economy role only a positive one in the development of other domains To understand the role that the fall of the Economy can have on other domains, we focus on Economy- culture relation. Assuming the role of the spillover effect of the Economic crises on the culture we conclude that the Economy should not be the only basis of development, but we should enlarge our possibilities of independence of other domains.


International Letters of Social and Humanistic Sciences (Volume 87)
D. Gavrilov, "The Spillover Effect of the EU Economy on the Culture", International Letters of Social and Humanistic Sciences, Vol. 87, pp. 23-31, 2019
Online since:
May 2019

[1] R. Heilbroner, L. Thurow, Economics Explained. Everything you need to know about how the economy works and where it's going. New York: Touchstone, (1982).

[2] N.G. Mankiw, Principles of Economics, 2nd ed., Forth Worth: Harcourt Publishers, (2001).

[3] P. Krugman, R. Wells, Microeconomics, New York: Worth, (2004).

[4] D.C. Colander, Economics, 6th ed., Boston: McGraw-Hill Irwin, (2006).

[5] M. Backhouse, Retrospectives on the definition of economics, Journal of Economics Perspectives. 23(1) (2009) 221-233.

[6] Financial Dictionary. (2018, 04 03). Economic policy. Retrieved 04 03, 2018, from Financial dictionary. Available:

[7] D. Throsby, The Economics of Cultural Policy. Cambridge, New York, Melbourne: Cambridge University Press, (2010).

[8] F. Murgas, H. Bohm, Does Economic growth improve quality of life? 15th International Multidisciplinary Scientific GeoConference SGEM, 2014, pp.1-8.


[9] T. Persson, G. Tabellini, Political economics. Explaining economic policy. Massachusetts: MIT Press, (2000).

[10] D. Baker, G. Epstein, R. Pollin, Globalization and Progressive Economic Policy. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Cambridge University Press, (1998).

[11] K.E. Poole et al., (2018, 04 03). Government economic policy. Retrieved 04 03, 2018, from Encyclopedia Britannica. Available:

[12] L. Jonung, T. Hagberg, How costly was the crisis of the 1990s? A comparative analysis of the deepest crises in Finland and Sweden over the last 130 years (No. 224). Directorate General Economic and Financial Affairs (DG ECFIN), European Commission, (2005).

[13] E. Banus, Cultural Policy in the EU and the European Identity. In M. Farell, Fella, Newman, Banus, European integration in the twenty century: unity in diversity?, SAGE, (2002).


[14] F. Bianchini, Remarking European cities: the role of cultural policies. In B. Franco, Cultural Policy & Urban Regeneration: the West European Experience (p.220). Manchester: Manchester University Press, (1993).


[15] T. Dumont, Cultural diversity and subsidiarity: The case of cultural tourism in the European Union. European Studies.24 (2007) 45-64.


[16] L. McGowan, Theorizing European Integration: revisiting neo-functionalism and testing suitability for explaining the development of EC competition policy? European Integration online Studies, 2007, pp.1-19.

[17] I. Bărbulescu, Noua Europă. Identitate și model european. Iași: POLIROM, (2015).

[18] M. Eilsrup-Sangiovani, (2018, 01 23). Debates on European Integration. Retrieved 01 23, 2018, from European Studies. Available:

[19] D. Kleinshmidt, (2013, 06 11). Neofunctionalism vs. Intergovernmentalism. A comparison of regional integration theories and their connectedness with the European Parliament. Retrieved 01 24, 2018, from Union Files Wordpress. Available:

[20] M. Bodziany, Social and cultural factors of the economic crisis in Grece. INTERCATHEDRA. 31(4) (2015) 7-16.

[21] C. Shore, In uno plures? EU Cultural Policy and the Governance of Europe, Cultural Analysis. 5 (2006) 7- 26.

[22] K. Sarikakis, Media and Cultural Policy in the European Union. European Studies. 24 (2007) 45-52.

[23] J.-L. Sauron, Curs de Institutii Europene. Puzzle-ul European. Iași: POLIROM, (2010).

[24] A. Zamora-Kapoor, X. Coller (2015, 05 19). The effects of the crisis: why southern Europe? PMC (US Naţional Library of Medicine, Naţional Institute of Health).

[25] European Commission. (2009). Economic Crisis in Europe: Causes, Consequences and Responses. Economic and Financial Affairs, 1-108.

[26] M. Moldoveanu, V. Ioan-Franc, The impact of the economic crisis on culture, Review of General Management. (2011) 15-35.

[27] A. Schramme, Culture in challenging times: towards new models of business and governance for the cultural sector. Bruxelles: ENCATC, (2013).

[28] J. Jurowicz, New business models for artists in challenging times. Bruxelles: ENCATC, (2013).

[29] J.-P. Baeyens, New governance models for cultural organizations in challenging times. Bruxelles: ENCATC, (2013).

[30] R. Amsellem, New business models for museums in challenging times. Bruxelles: ENCATC, (2013).

[31] J.-D. Seroen, Redesigning the business model of cultural organizations in a time of economic crisis. Bruxelles: ENCATC, (2013).

Show More Hide
Cited By:
This article has no citations.