Subscribe

Subscribe to our Newsletter and get informed about new publication regulary and special discounts for subscribers!

ILSHS > Volume 81 > Analysis of the Validity of Kuznets Curve of...
< Back to Volume

Analysis of the Validity of Kuznets Curve of Energy Intensity among D-8 Countries: Panel-ARDL Approach

Full Text PDF

Abstract:

The objective of the study is to test experimentally the Kuznets curve of energy intensity in selected developing countries (Iran, Turkey, Malaysia, Pakistan, Egypt, Bangladesh, Indonesia and Nigeria) with the focus of D-8 countries during 1990-2014. According to the results, and by using the static and dynamic estimators and the Panel- ARDL model, the Kuznets curve was accepted for energy intensity and the per capita income threshold was estimated $3931.25. The urbanization rate and the degree of industrialization have a positive and significant effect on the GDP of consuming energy of D-8 countries in the long term. The most important policy recommendations were discussed for policy-makers and researchers.

Info:

Periodical:
International Letters of Social and Humanistic Sciences (Volume 81)
Pages:
1-12
Citation:
P. Fazli and E. Abbasi, "Analysis of the Validity of Kuznets Curve of Energy Intensity among D-8 Countries: Panel-ARDL Approach", International Letters of Social and Humanistic Sciences, Vol. 81, pp. 1-12, 2018
Online since:
April 2018
Export:
Distribution:
References:

[1] Y.Le Pen, B. Sévi, On the non-convergence of energy intensities: evidence from a pair- wise econometric approach, Ecological Economics. 69 (2010) 641–650.

[2] World Bank.2017. Energy intensity level of primary energy (MJ/$2011 PPP GDP), Sustainable Energy for All (SE4ALL) database from the SE4ALL Global Tracking Framework led jointly by the World Bank, International Energy Agency, and the Energy Sector Management Assistance Program.

[3] P. Mulder, H.L.F. Groot, Structural change and convergence of energy intensity across OECD countries (1970–2005), Energy Economics. 34(6) (2012) 1910–(1921).

[4] J. Huang, D. Du, Q. Tao, An analysis of technological factors and energy intensity in China, Energy Policy. 109 (2017) 1-9.

[5] P.K. Adom, Determinants of energy intensity in South Africa: Testing for structural effects in parameters, Energy. 89 (2015) 334-346.

[6] J.W. Burnett, J. Madariaga, The convergence of U.S. state-level energy intensity, Energy Economics. 62 (2017) 357-370.

[7] F. Bilgili et al., The impact of urbanization on energy intensity: Panel data evidence considering cross-sectional dependence and heterogeneity, Energy. 133 (2017) 242-256.

[8] B. Choi, W. Park, B.-K. Yu, Energy intensity and firm growth, Energy Economics. 65 (2017) 399-410.

[9] W.W. Rostow, The Stages of Economic Growth. A Non-Communist Manifesto (3rd Edition), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, (1990).

[10] G.M. Grossman, A.B. Krueger, Environmental impacts of a North American Free Trade Agreement, National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper 3914, NBER, Cambridge MA, (1991).

[11] Developing 8 Countries, Accessible from: http://www.developing8.org.

[12] A-M. Seif, Energy intensity: effective factors and estimation of a proposed function, Journal of Energy Economics Studies. 5(18) (2008) 177-201.

[13] M. Jamshidi, An analysis of residential energy intensity in Iran, a system dynamics approach, in: Proceedings of the 26th International Conference of the System Dynamics Society, Athens, Greece, 2008, pp.20-24.

[14] H. Yu, The influential factors of China's regional energy intensity and its spatial linkages: 1988–2007, Energy Policy. 45 (2012) 583–593.

[15] P. Sadorsky, Do urbanization and industrialization affect energy intensity in developing countries?, Energy Economics. 37 (2013) 52–59.

[16] H. Yan, Provincial energy intensity in China: The role of urbanization, Energy Policy. 86 (2015) 635-650.

[17] E. Durana, C. Aravenab, R. Aguilarc, Analysis and decomposition of energy consumption in the Chilean industry, Energy Policy. 86 (2015) 552–561.

[18] B.H. Baltagi, Econometric Analysis of Panel Data, 5th Edition, Wiley, (2013).

[19] M.H. Pesaran, R.P. Smith, Estimating long-run relationships from dynamic heterogeneous panels, Journal of Econometrics. 68(1) (1995) 79-113.

[20] M.H. Pesaran, Estimation and inference in large heterogeneous panels with a multifactor error structure, Econometrica. 74(4) (2006) 967-1012.

[21] J. Coakley, A-M. Fuertes, R.P. Smith, Unobserved heterogeneity in panel time series models, Computational Statistics & Data Analysis. 50(9) (2006) 2361–2380.

[22] M. Eberhardt, T. Francis, Econometrics for Grumblers: A New Look at the Literature on Cross-Country Growth Empirics, Journal of Economic Surveys. 25(1) (2011) 109–155.

[23] M.H. Pesaran, Y. Shin, R. Smith, Pooled mean group estimation of dynamic heterogeneous panels, Journal of the American Statistical Association. 94(446) (1999) 621–634.

[24] E.F. Blackburne III, M.W. Frank, Estimation of nonstationary heterogeneous panels, The Stata Journal. 7(2) (2007) 197–208.

[25] A. Levin, C.-F. Lin, C.-S.J. Chu, Unit root tests in panel data: Asymptotic and finite- sample properties, Journal of Econometrics. 108(1) (2002) 1–24.

[26] K.S. Im, M. H. Pesaran, Y. Shin, Testing for unit roots in heterogeneous panels, Journal of Econometrics. 115(1) (2003) 53–74.

[27] C.D. Kao, Spurious regression and residual-based tests for cointegration in panel data, Journal of Econometrics. 90(1) (1999) 1–44.

[28] G.E. Schwarz, Estimating the dimension of a model, Annals of Statistics. 6(2) (1978) 461–464.

Show More Hide
Cited By:
This article has no citations.