Subscribe

Subscribe to our Newsletter and get informed about new publication regulary and special discounts for subscribers!

ILSHS > Volume 75 > Taboo and Euphemism in the Religious Language
< Back to Volume

Taboo and Euphemism in the Religious Language

Full Text PDF

Abstract:

The instrument of knowledge and communication of religious essence, the religious language is based upon the recognition of a world of sacredness, which is defined by reference to the religious dimension of the human being. From the semantic perspective, the religious language is rooted in a preexisting extra-linguistic referent, which eludes historic space-time categories, in an attempt to build a world of transcendental essence and establish a relationship between man and the sacred. In this view, the word is invested with magical powers, playing the role of a mediator between the human being living in the world of the profane and the sacred world of the Divinity. Since the word embraces the essence of the named element with the power to shape reality, the religious man pays special attention to the verbal expression not only from the desire to adapt to reality, but especially out of the care not to cause adverse changes amidst it. We propose in this paper to review the main religious taboos specific to the religious language and the description of the pragmatic valences that the euphemistic expression manifests in the religious communication.

Info:

Periodical:
International Letters of Social and Humanistic Sciences (Volume 75)
Pages:
1-9
Citation:
M. Mocanu "Taboo and Euphemism in the Religious Language", International Letters of Social and Humanistic Sciences, Vol. 75, pp. 1-9, 2017
Online since:
Jan 2017
Authors:
Export:
Distribution:
References:

[1] F. Sigmund, Totem and taboo, revised translation, preface and notes by Leonard Gavriliu, Mediarex Publishing House, (1996).

[2] D.P. Chamizo, Linguistic interdiction: Its status quaestionis and possible future research lines, Language Sciences. 31(4) (2009) 428-446.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langsci.2007.09.006

[3] C. Eugen, Metaphorical Creation in Language, in: Dacoromania, new series, V–VI, 2000–2001, Cluj-Napoca.

[4] B. Kate, Taboo, Euphemism and Political Correctness, in: Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics, Elsevier, (2006).

[5] J. Roman, Essais de linguistique générale, Éditions de Minuit, Paris, (1963).

[6] C. Gheorghe, Refections on the Current Church Language, Academy Publishing House, Bucharest, (1997).

[7] R. Zafiu, Archaism and Innovation in Religious Language, in: Stylistic Diversity in Current Romanian Language, University Publishing House, Bucharest, (2001).

[8] G. Alexandru, The Names in the Bible, in: Cultural Romanian nr. 9/(2008).

[9] G. Charles, Le tabou linguistique: limites dʼune explication, în: Etudes de linguistique generale et de linguistique latine, Societe pour l̕ Information Grammaticale, 1987, Paris.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2143/bsl.90.1.2002528

[10] S. Lavinia, Another Kind of NOT to Say: euphemism and disphemism in Romance languages, Ștefan cel Mare, Publishing House, Suceava, (2011).

[11] B. Emil, Old/Ancient and Modern Euphemisms, in ch. Vocabulary and Culture, in Problemes of General Linguistics, vol. I, Universitas Publishing House, Bucharest, (2000).

[12] D. Ovidiu, Parofonic Euphemism, in: Studies of Romanian Language in the Memory of Professor Radu Sp. Popescu, Universitaria Publishing House, Craiova, (2008).

[13] DEX =Ion Coteanu, Luiza Seche, Mircea Seche (coord. ), Explanatory Dictionary of the Romanian Language, Academy Publishing House, Bucharest, (1975).

[14] DN = Florin Marcu and Const. Maneca, Dictionary of Neologisms, Academy Publishing House, Bucharest, (1986).

[15] DSL = Angela-Bidu Vranceanu et alii, Dictionary of Language Sciences, Nemira Publishing House, Bucharest, 2005, p.205.

[16] NODEX = The New Explanatory Dictionary of the Romanian Language, Litera International Publishing House, (2002).

[17] Information on http: /patriarhia. ro.

[18] Information on http: /ziarullumina. ro.

Show More Hide