Remarks on the History of the Navy of the Empire of Nicaea in the Light of the Chronicle of Georgios Akropolites

Böhm, Marcin

doi:10.18052/www.scipress.com/ILSHS.74.54

ILSHS > ILSHS Volume 74 > Remarks on the History of the Navy of the Empire...

< Back to Volume

Remarks on the History of the Navy of the Empire of Nicaea in the Light of the Chronicle of Georgios Akropolites

Full Text PDF

Abstract:

The Empire of Nicaea was a successor of the Byzantium shattered in 1204. In the newly established state marine traditions of Byzantines, remain alive. The best testimony to this, are the evidence contained in the chronicle of Georgios Akropolites, devoted to activities of the rulers of Nicaea, aimed to build their own naval forces. In this paper I'll also try to answer, where was beating the heart of the Nicean shipbuilding industry and how large was the navy of this state. This is important from point of view of the maritime history, because of the fleet of the Empire of Nicaea, filled the gap created after the fall of Constantinople and the Byzantine Empire, which was the local naval power in previous centuries. Akropolites give us a clear and direct answer to a question, where we should search for a center of Nicaean shipbuilding industry. Georgios Akropolites suggest us, that was in two towns, Holkos and Smyrna. The above-mentioned fleet consisted of the few squadrons, each counting 5-6 ships. We can only guess that a fleet of the John III, could count about 50 warships, whose quality was worse to that belonging to the Venetians. We must say that the fleet of the Empire of Nicaea, which we see in the chronicle of Akropolites, was the force, that lent itself to the support of ground forces. And in this role worked well. The situation was different when it comes to clashing with the Venetians, with the experienced crews of their ships, who surpassed Nicaean in this matter. Even with the advantage of numbers, Nicaean was unable to overcome at the sea, the citizens of the Republic of St. Mark. The plan to build their own naval forces, which was taken by the emperors of Nicaea, was a good direction.

Info:

Periodical:

International Letters of Social and Humanistic Sciences (Volume 74)

Pages:

54-57

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18052/www.scipress.com/ILSHS.74.54

Citation:

M. Böhm, "Remarks on the History of the Navy of the Empire of Nicaea in the Light of the Chronicle of Georgios Akropolites", International Letters of Social and Humanistic Sciences, Vol. 74, pp. 54-57, 2016

Online since:

November 2016

Authors:

Marcin Böhm

Keywords:

Byzantine Navy, Empire of Nicaea, Georgios Akropolites, John III Doukas Vatazes, Venice

Export:

RIS, BibTeX, Text

Distribution:

Open Access

This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License

References:

[1] H. Ahrweiler, Byzance et la Mèr, Paris, France, 1966, pp.301-327.

[2] M. Angold, A Byzantine government in exile: government and society under the Laskardis of Nicaea, 1204-1261, London, 1975, pp.196-200.

[3] R. Macrides, George Akropolites, The History, Translated with an Introduction and Commentary by Ruth Macrides, Oxford Studies of Byzantium, Oxford University Press, 2007, pp.100-101.

[4] A. Heisenberg ed., Georgii Akropolitae Opera, vols. I-II, Stuttgart, Germany, (1978).

[5] D. Jacoby, The Venetian Presence in the Latin Empire of Constantinople (1204-1261): the Challenge of Feudalism and the Byzantine Inheritance 141-201, Jahrbuch der Osterreichischen Byzantinistik 43 (1993), p.165.

[6] G. Perry, John of Brienne, King of Jerusalem, Emperor of Constaninople, pp.1175-1237, Cambridge, 2013, p.172.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9781107337800

[7] P. Lock, The Franks in the Aegean, 1204-1500, London-New York, 1995, p.65; Jacoby, The Venetian, p.165.

[8] Andreae Danduli ducis Venetiarum chronica pre extensum descripta, RIS XII/1, Bologna-Città di Castello, 1938-1942, p.298, 10-14.

[9] A. Kažhdan, Abydos, in: The Oxford Dictionary of Byzantium, ed. Aleksander Kažhdan, New York, 1991, vol. 1, pp.8-9.

[10] Annae Comnenae Alexias, ed. D.R. Reinsch, A. Kambylis, Corpus Fontium Historiae Byzantinae, vol. 40/1, Berlin, 2001, XI 5, 3, p.336.

[11] A. Kažhdan, Smyrna, in: The Oxford Dictionary of Byzantium, vol. 4, p.1920-(1921).

[12] A. Savvides, Ο Seltzukos emires tes Smyrnes Τzachas(Caka) kai oi epidomes tou sta mikroasiatika paralia, ta nesia tou anatoliku Aigaiote kai ten Konstantinopole, pp.1081-1106, B', Chiaka Chronika 16 (1984), p.61.

[13] M. Böhm, Flota i polityka morska Aleksego I Komnena (The Fleet and maritime policy of the Emperor Alexius I Comnenus), Kraków, Poland, 2012, pp.144-145.

[14] J.H. Pryor, E.M. Jeffreys, The Age of Dromon, Leiden, Netherlands, 2006, p.323.

[15] Nicephori Gregorae, Byzantina Historia, ed. L. Schopen, vol. I, Bonnae, 1829, pp.28-29.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9781139175470.002

Show More Hide

Cited By:

[1] M. Leszka, "Marcin Böhm, Rola flot obcych w procesie ostatecznego rozkładu sił morskich cesarstwa bizantyńskiego (1118–1204) [The Role of Foreign Fleets in the Decomposition of the Naval Forces of Byzantium], Napoleon V, Oświęcim 2016, pp. 239", Studia Ceranea, Vol. 7, p. 272, 2017

DOI: https://doi.org/10.18778/2084-140X.07.16