Subscribe

Subscribe to our Newsletter and get informed about new publication regulary and special discounts for subscribers!

ILSHS > Volume 70 > Semantic Restrictions of Forming Derivative Nouns...
< Back to Volume

Semantic Restrictions of Forming Derivative Nouns in the Class of the Process Verbs

Full Text PDF

Abstract:

Studying structural, phono-morphological, semantic, stylistic, word-forming and lexical conformities regulating syntagmatic connections in word-formation, requires studying system restrictions of the word-forming morphemes combinability, predetermined by the meaning of a word sign as well. The aim of the article is to identify semantic restrictions and those close to them in forming deverbative nouns from the process verbs. It was defined that such kinds of restrictions as semantic, semantic-pragmatic, semantic-stylistic, lexical and structural-morphological can counteract the possibility of the process verbs to take part in derivation processes. Semantic restrictions are located at the level of syntagmatic, differentiating semes and the abstract subcategoric seme “becoming”. Aspect semes don’t influence the possibility of the process verbs to take part in the word formation processes. Semantic restrictions can be predetermined both by the presence and by the absence of definite semes in a semantic structure of a word.

Info:

Periodical:
International Letters of Social and Humanistic Sciences (Volume 70)
Pages:
37-43
Citation:
L. Ponomaryova "Semantic Restrictions of Forming Derivative Nouns in the Class of the Process Verbs", International Letters of Social and Humanistic Sciences, Vol. 70, pp. 37-43, 2016
Online since:
Jun 2016
Export:
Distribution:
References:

[1] Y.A. Zemskaya, Modern Russian language. Word formation, Prosveshcheniye, Moskow, USSR, (1973).

[2] I.S. Ulukhanov, Word-building semantics in Russian and the principles of its description, Editorial, Moskow, Russian Federation, (2001).

[3] H.J. Neuhaus, Wortbildung und Semantik, in: Perspektiven der Wortbildungsforschung, Bonn, Germany, 1977, pp.203-209.

[4] B. Hansen, K. Hansen, A. Neubert, M. Schentke, Englische Lexikologie. Einführung in die Wortbildung und lexische Semantik, VEB Verlag Enzyklopädie, Leipzig, Germany, (1982).

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/007542428601900111

[5] F. Plank, Morphologische Irregularitäten. Aspekte der Wortstrukturtheorie, Tübingen, Narr, Germany, (1981).

[6] Y.S. Kubryakova, Z.A. Kharitonchik, On word building significance and description of the semantic structure of derivatives of the suffix type, Moskow, USSR, 1976, pp.292-233.

[7] M.D. Stepanowa, W. Fleischer, Grundzüge der deutschen Wortbildung, VEB Bibliographisches Institut, Leipzig, Germany, (1985).

[8] J. Erben, Einführung in die deutsche Wortbildungslehre, in: Grundlagen der Germanistik, v. 17, Erich Schmidt, Berlin, Germany, (2006).

[9] W. Fleischer, Regeln der Wortbildung und Wortverwendung, in: Deutsch als Fremdsprache, 1978, pp.78-85.

[10] W. Fleischer, I. Barz, Wortbildung der deutschen Gegenwartssprache, Niemeyer Verlag GmbH, Tübingen, Germany, (2007).

[11] E.V. Clark, H.H. Clark, When Nouns Surface as Verbs, Language, 55: 4, (1979) 767-811.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/412745

[12] D. Kastowsky, Wortbildung und Semantik, Pädagogischer Verlag Schwann, Düsseldorf, Germany, (1982).

[13] W. Motsch, Deutsche Wortbildung in Grundzügen, in: Schriften des Instituts für deutsche Sprache; 8, Walter de Gruyter, Berlin/New York, (2004).

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/zfgl.2001.007

[14] J.H. Rose, Principle Limitations on Productivity in Denominal Verbs, Foundation of Language, 10: 4 (1973) 509-526.

[15] H. Brinkmann, Die Wortarten im Deutschen, in: Das Ringen um eine neue deutsche Grammatik, Darmstadt, Germany, 1965, pp.101-127.

[16] E. Mater, Deutsche Verben. Bd. 3, VEB Bibliographisches Institut, Leipzig, Germany, (1967).

[17] R.M. Gaisina, Meaning and syntagmatics of verbs (relation verbs as an example), Vyshchaya shkola, Moskow, USSR, (1986).

[18] A.A. Ufimtseva, Lexical meaning: the principle of semiological lexis description, Nauka, Moskow, USSR, (1986).

[19] W. Fleischer, Wortbildung der deutschen Gegenwartssprache, VEB Bibliographisches Institut, Leipzig, Germany, (1983).

[20] R. Kurth, Über den Gebrauch der Bildungen auf und Gebrauch der Wörter auf –ei, –erei, –elei, in: Beiträge zur Geschichte der deutschen Sprache und Literatur, Halle (Saale), Germany, 1956, bd. 78, pp.307-316.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/bgsl.1953.1953.75.442

[21] Th. Schippan, Die Verbalsubstantive in der deutschen Sprache der Gegenwart, in: Deutschunterricht, H. 9, 1968, pp.516-526.

[22] H. Wellmann, Das Substantiv, Pädagogischer Verlag Schwann, Düsseldorf, Germany, (1975).

[23] N.B. Pimenova, Semantische Restriktionen für die unga-Ableitung im Althochdeutschen, Germanistisches Jahrbuch der GUS Das Wort,. (2002) 93-106.

[24] N.A. Dementyeva, Comparative and semantic analysis of the verbs of sound in German and Russian, Moskow, USSR, (1982).

[25] M.D. Stepanova, Word formation of the modern German language, Publishing house of literature in foreign languages, Moskow, USSR, (1953).

[26] Y.A. Glukhareva, Sound imitating verbs with dissonant denotant (semantic peculiarities), Tula, 1976, pp.77-94.

[27] L.F. Ponomaryova, Semantic restrictions in forming deverbative derivatives with the meaning of subject, Bulletin of the Dnipropetrovsk University, series Language studies. 22: 11 (2014) 127-133.

Show More Hide