Forecasting Change Based on Employees’ Work Engagement: Case Study (Civil Servants in Government Organizations in Sanandaj)

E'temad, Khaled; Rahmanseresht, Hossein

doi:10.18052/www.scipress.com/ILSHS.64.119

ILSHS > Volume 64 > Forecasting Change Based on Employees’ Work...

< Back to Volume

Forecasting Change Based on Employees’ Work Engagement: Case Study (Civil Servants in Government Organizations in Sanandaj)

Full Text PDF

Abstract:

The study tries to identify predictors of change acceptance based on work engagement of civil servants in government organizations in Sanandaj. The population of the study is 4235 civil servants in government organizations in Sanandaj. The present study uses stratified random sampling method. Using Cochran’s Formula, as many as 352 people were set as the sample size and the same number of questionnaires was filled by the participants. The study was descriptive co relational and was carried out through a descriptive method. A questionnaire was used for data collection to measure the level of work engagement, the questionnaire proposed by Schaufeli and Becker (2003) was used. To measure change acceptance in the respondents, the questionnaire proposed by Saeatchi, Kamkari and Askarian (2010) was designed according to the model by Kurt Lewin. After the validity and reliability of the questionnaires were confirmed, the questionnaires were distributed among the participants. Cronbach's alpha in work engagement and in change acceptance questionnaires were 0.84 and 0.82, respectively. After completing the questionnaire using SPSS20, Pearson correlation analysis and multivariate regression analysis were calculated and analyzed. The results of regression analysis showed that the dependent variable (change acceptance) was directly affected by liveliness and eagerness of the staff. This variable alone explains 44% of acceptance of change variance in this study. The independent variable is directly affected by eagerness variable. This variable alone accounts for 39% of accepting change variance in the population under study. The third determinant of accepting change is the employees’ dedication variable. This variable alone amounts to 31% of change acceptance variance by staff in the population under study.

Info:

Periodical:

International Letters of Social and Humanistic Sciences (Volume 64)

Pages:

119-125

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18052/www.scipress.com/ILSHS.64.119

Citation:

K. E'temad and H. Rahmanseresht, "Forecasting Change Based on Employees’ Work Engagement: Case Study (Civil Servants in Government Organizations in Sanandaj)", International Letters of Social and Humanistic Sciences, Vol. 64, pp. 119-125, 2015

Online since:

November 2015

Authors:

Khaled E'temad, Hossein Rahmanseresht

Keywords:

Change Acceptance, Government Agencies in Sanandaj, Work Engagement

Export:

RIS, BibTeX, Text

Distribution:

Open Access

This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License

References:

[1] Bakhshi, N. (2011). Organizational change. Monthly Periodical of Labor & Society, No. 2011: 67-60.

[2] Rahmanseresht, H.; Moghadam, A. (2007). The role of mental models in the process of organizational change (case study is one of the companies producing tissue paper). Journal of Management, 78, 3-24.

[3] Saatchi, Mahmoud; Kamkari, K., Askarian, M. (2010). Psychological tests, Tehran. Virayesh Publication.

[4] Isakhani, A. (2013). Explaining the role of occupational and personal resources in work engagement. Public Administration, 5 (2): 73-96.

[5] Isakhani, A., Fani, A. Danaeefard, H. (2012). The relationship between work engagement and organizational commitment. Public Management Research Quarterly, 16: 23-38.

[6] Frazja, M. and Khademi, M. (2011).

[7] Ghorbanzadeh, D.; Akbari, M. (2010). Personal characteristics and organizational role in the adoption of organizational changes, Paper presented at the Fifth International Conference on Management, Tehran, 27 to 29 December.

[8] Barbaroux, P. (2011). A design-oriented approach to organizational change: insights from a military case study. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 24(5), 626-639.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/09534811111158895

[9] Bakker, A. B., & Demerouti, E. (2007). Towards a model of work engagement. Career development international, 13(3), 209-223.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/13620430810870476

[10] Ledez, R. E. (2011). Change management: getting a tuned up organization. Human Resource Management: Issues, Challenges and Opportunities, 73.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1201/b12878-5

[11] Macey, W. H., & Schneider, B. (2008). The meaning of employee engagement. Industrial and organizational psychology, 1(1), 3-30.

[12] Macey, W.H., Schneider, B., Barbara, K.M., Young, S.A. (2009). Employee engagement: Tools for analysis, practice and competitive advantages. Willey- Blackwell, UK.

[13] Papadakis, V. M., Lioukas, S., & Chambers, D. (1998). Strategic decision-making processes: the role of management and context. Strategic management journal, 19(2), 115-147.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/(sici)1097-0266(199802)19:2<115::aid-smj941>3.0.co;2-5

[14] Rothbard, N.P. (2001). Enriching or depleting? The dynamics of engagement in work and family roles. Administrative Science Quarterly, 46(4): 655-684.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/3094827

[15] Soparnot, R. (2011). The concept of organizational change capacity. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 24(5), 640-661.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/09534811111158903

[16] Schaufeli, W. B., & Bakker, A. B. (2003). Utrecht work engagement scale: Preliminary manual. Occupational Health Psychology Unit, Utrecht University, Utrecht.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/t05561-000

Show More Hide

Cited By:

This article has no citations.