Paper Titles in Periodical
International Letters of Social and Humanistic Sciences
ILSHS Volume 63

Subscribe to our Newsletter and get informed about new publication regulary and special discounts for subscribers!

ILSHS > ILSHS Volume 63 > Physics Diagnostic Test: An Approach to Qualify...
< Back to Volume

Physics Diagnostic Test: An Approach to Qualify Astronomy Students

Full Text PDF


This study determines the learning outcomes measured by the physics diagnostic test, the performance of the incoming college freshman astronomy students in the physics diagnostic test, the suitability of the physics diagnostic test as entry requirement for the BS Astronomy Technology students, and the differences in the result of the physics diagnostic test. It deals with the analysis on the conceptualization that students may have difficulties pursuing the astronomy course if they have impediments in the result of their physics diagnostic test. In the past years, it casually occurs that students with low physics adaptation results to have lower to failing grades when they reach higher astronomy subjects.This study utilized a causal-comparative research design. A purposive sampling was used to the incoming freshmen students of BS Astronomy Technology during the first semester of school year 2014-2015 who took the 25 item validated basic introductory concepts in physics diagnostic test of the department.The findings showed that the physics diagnostic test measured and matched the prescribed learning outcomes set by the department. It also showed that most of the students have very satisfactorily understanding in physics. Therefore, it concludes that the physics diagnostic test match entry requirement for BS Astronomy Technology and that there is no significant difference in the physics diagnostic test between the BS Astronomy Technology college freshman students.


International Letters of Social and Humanistic Sciences (Volume 63)
R. M. D. Guido and R. A. B. Dela Cruz, "Physics Diagnostic Test: An Approach to Qualify Astronomy Students", International Letters of Social and Humanistic Sciences, Vol. 63, pp. 129-135, 2015
Online since:
November 2015

K. Antje, et al., Towards a Conceptual Diagnostic Survey in Nuclear Physics, European Journal of Physics, (32) 1 (2011).

Bagno, E., et al., Meeting the Challenge of Students' Understanding of Formulae in Highschool Physics: A Learning Tool. Physics Education. (43) 1 (2008).

Bates, S. P. et al. Student Generated Content: Using PeerWise to Enhance Engagement and Outcomes in Introductory Physics Courses. In 2011, Physics Education Research Conference, AIP Conf. Proc. 1413, 123 (2012).

Bates, S. et al., Assessing the Quality of a Student-Generated Questions Repository, Physics Education Research, (10) 2 (2014).

Berber, N., Developing a Physics Laboratory Anxiety Scale, Asia-Pacific Forum on Science Learning and Teaching. (14) 1. Article 7, p.1 (2013).

Brass, C. et al., Quality Learning of Physics: Conceptions held by High School and University Teachers, Research in Science Education, 33 (2), 245- 271 (2003).

Campbell, A. et al., Practitioner Research and Professional Development in Education, SAGE Publications Limited. (2004).

Darling-Hammond, L., Teacher Quality and Student Achievement: A Review of State Policy Evidence, Education Policy Analysis Archives, 8 (1), 1-15 (2000).

Darling-Hammond, L. et al., Does Teacher Certification Matter? Evaluating the Evidence, Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 23 (1), 57-77 (2001).

Denny, P. et al., PeerWise: Students Sharing their Multiple Choice Questions, In Proceeding of the Fourth International Workshop on Computing Education Research (ACM, New York). 51-58 (2008).

Goldhaber, D., & Anthony, E., Teacher Quality and Student Achievement, Urban Diversity Series, New York N. Y.: Eric Clearinghouse on Urban Education. (2003).

Guido, R.M. D., Attitudes and Motivation towards Learning Physics. International Journal of Engineering Research and Technology. (2) 11, 2087-2094 (2013).

Hall, N., & Webb, D., Instructors' Support of Student Autonomy in an Introductory Physics Course, Physic Education Research. (10) 2 (2014).

Jiar, Y. K., & Long, C. Y., Mathematical Thinking and Physics and Physics Achievement of Secondary School Student, Faculty of Education, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia. (2012).

Kautz, C. H. et al., Student Understanding of the Ideal Gas Law, Part II: A Microscopic Perspective, Am. J. Phys. 73, 1064 (2005).

Kerrison, R., Retraining Chemistry Teachers in the Philippines, Research in Science Education. 22, 248-254 (1992).

Kunter, M., & Baumert, J., Who is the expert? Construct and Criteria Validity of Student and Teacher Ratings of Instruction, Learning Environments Research, 9 (3), 231-251 (2006).

Kryjevskaia, M. et al., Answer First: Applying the Heuristic-Analytic Theory of Reasoning to Examine Student Intuitive Thinking in the Context of Physics, Physics Education Research. (10) 2 (2014).

Paterson, J., et al., Uses of Peer Assessment in Database Teaching and Learning, in Data Security and Security Data, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 6121, edited by L. MacKinnon (Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg) 135-146 (2012).

Sabella, M., & Cochran, G. L., Evidence of Intuitive and Formal Knowledge in Student Responses: Examples from the Context of Dynamics, AIP Conf. Proc. 720, 89 (2004).

Scheerens, J., Teachers' Professional Development: Europe in International Comparison, A Secondary Analysis based on the TALIS dataset. The Netherlands: University of Twente. (2009).

Sharma, S., & Ahluwalia, P. K., Diagnosing Alternative Conceptions of Fermi Energy among Undergraduate Students, European Journal of Physics, (33) 4 (2012).

Singh, C., Student Understanding of Symmetry and Gauss's Law of Electricity, Am. J. Phys. 74, 923 (2006).

Treagust, D., Development and use of Diagnostic Tests to Evaluate Students' Misconceptions in Science, International Journal of Science Education. (10) 2 (2007).

Watkins, E., & Sabella, M., Examining the Effectiveness of Clickers on Promoting Learning by Tracking the Evolution of Student Responses, AIP Conf. Proc. 1064, 223 (2008).

Wittmann, M., et al., Making Sense of How Students make Sense of Mechanical Waves, Phys. Teach. (1999).

Show More Hide
Cited By:
This article has no citations.