Paper Titles in Periodical
International Letters of Social and Humanistic Sciences
Volume 62

Subscribe

Subscribe to our Newsletter and get informed about new publication regulary and special discounts for subscribers!

ILSHS > Volume 62 > On the Comparison of Effectiveness of Direct...
< Back to Volume

On the Comparison of Effectiveness of Direct Instruction Method and Multimedia Instruction on Students Suffering from Special Learning Disorder along with Defects in Dictation

Full Text PDF

Abstract:

Dictation defect is one of the most rampant special learning disorders among students which accounts for around 30% of all the learning disorders. This research was conducted with the aim of comparing the effectiveness of the direct instruction and multimedia instruction on the dictation defects. The research methodology is of an experimental method along with pretest and posttest accompanied with a control group. After preparing necessary instruments for this research, i.e. the Wechsler intelligence test for children, Dictation instruction software and Karimi dictation tests, the number of 39 male third grade junior students was chosen through multistage sampling method from among Kermanshah schools and was randomly placed in three 13 people groups. A group was administered the independent variable of direct instruction while the second group was administered the independent variable of multimedia instruction whereas the control group did not receive any intervention. After collecting the students' dictation scores of all three groups in the pretest and posttest, data were analyzed via using the SPSS software and through Covariance analysis. Results revealed that direct instruction and multimedia instruction were meaningfully effective on the improvement of dictation disorder. Also, direct instruction was found to be more effective than the multimedia instruction.

Info:

Periodical:
International Letters of Social and Humanistic Sciences (Volume 62)
Pages:
8-15
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18052/www.scipress.com/ILSHS.62.8
Citation:
S. Azimigaroosi et al., "On the Comparison of Effectiveness of Direct Instruction Method and Multimedia Instruction on Students Suffering from Special Learning Disorder along with Defects in Dictation", International Letters of Social and Humanistic Sciences, Vol. 62, pp. 8-15, 2015
Online since:
Oct 2015
Authors:
Samad Azimigaroosi, Farshad Zhiean, Hadi Farahmand
Keywords:
Dictation Disorder, Direct Instruction, Multimedia Instruction, Special Learning Disorder
Export:
RIS, BibTeX, Text
Distribution:
Open Access

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License

References:

Ebrahimi, Zahra (2005).

Anstazi, Andre, (1993), Psychometrics, (Tr. Mohamad Taghi Braheni), University off Tehran press.

Pirzadi, Hojjat; Ghobari Bonab, Bagher; Shokoohi Yekta, Mohsen; Yar Yari, Fereydoon; Hasanzade, Saeed and Sharifi, Ahmad (2013).

Kharamide, Zahra (2007).

Donald, Nettiar (2000), Educating students with learning and behavioral problems, Tr. Esmaeel Biabangard and Naeeniyan (2003), Tehran: Department for Education of Exceptional Children.

Seyed Mohamdi, Yahya (2014), Mental Psychopathology based on DSM-5, Tehran: Ravan publication.

Seyf Naraghi, Maryam and Naderi, Ezzatollah (2005), Special disabilities in leaning, Tehran: Makyal cultural publication institute.

Seyf, Aliakbar (2009), Modern educational psychology, Psychology of learning and education, 6th edition, Tehran: Doran publication.

Shahim, Sima (1993), Use of Wexler IQ scale for Children, (WISC-R) in Iran, Psychological researches journal, 1-28-40.

Fardanesh, Heshmat (2003), Theoretical basics of educational technology, Tehran: SAMT.

Faryar, Akbar; Rakhshaan, Fereydoon (2000), Learning disabilities; theoretical principles, diagnosis and educational strategies, Tehran: Mabna publication.

Karami, Jahangir, (2005), Exploring epidemiology of dictation learning defects an d effects of multisensory treatment method on reduction of this inability among elementary students, Ahvaz, PhD dissertation, University of Shahid Chamran, Ahvaz.

Karimi, Behrooz, (2010), Comparison of effectiveness of direct instruction and phonology awareness on dictation defect, M.A. thesis, University of Allame Tabatabaee, Faculty of Psychology and educational Sciences.

Karimi, Yousef, (2005), Learning disorders, Tehran: Savalan publication.

Ganji, Mehdi (2014), Psychology of Exceptional children based on DSSM-5, Tehran: Savalan publication.

Adams, G., and Carnine, D. (2003). Direct instruction. InH. L. Swanson, K. R. Harris, & S. Graham (Eds. ), Handbook of learning disabilities (pp.403-416). New York: Guilford Press.

Allbritten.D., Mainzer,R. And Ziegler,D. (2004). Will Student With Disablities Be Scapegoate For School Failures? Educational Horizons, 82, 153- 600.

Brigham, R., and Brigham, M. (2001). Current practice alerts: Mnemonic instruction. Reston, VA: Division for Learning disabilities and Division for Research of the Council for Exceptional Children.

Bulgren, J. A., Deshler, D. D., Schumaker, J. B., and Lenz, B. K. (2000). The use and effectiveness of analogical instruction in diverse secondary content classrooms. Journal of Educational Psychology, 16, 426-441.

Carnine, D., Silbert, J., Kame'enui, E., & Tarver, S. (2004). Direct instruction reading (4th ed. ). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.

Casey, J., (2012). A Model To Guide the Conceptualization, Assessment, and Diagnosis of Nonverbal Learning Disorder. Canadian Journal of School Psychology. 27(1), 35-57.

Chun, D. M. & Plass, J. L. )1996(. Effects of multimedia annotations on vocabulary acquisition. The Modern Language Journal, 80 (2), 183- 198.

Dye, G. A. (2000). Graphic organizers to the rescue! Helping students link- and rememberinformation. Teaching Exceptional Children, 32, 72-76. Education, 33, 131- 152.

Jones, L., & Plass, J. (2002). Supporting listening comprehension and cquisition in French with multimedia annotations. The Modern Language Journal, 86(4), 546-561.

Joyce, B., Weil, M., and Calhoun, E. (2000). Models of teaching. (6th ed. ). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.

Kirk, S. A. (1963). Behavioral diagnosis and remediation of learning disabilities. In proceedings the conference on the problems of the perceptually Handicapped child. Evanston, IL: Fund for the Perseptual Handicapped Child.

Margaret, M. Flores., and Maria, Kaylor. (2007). The Effects of a Direct Instruction Program on the Fraction Performance of Middle school students At - risk for failure in mathematics.

Mayer, R. E. (2002). Cognitive Theory and the Design of Multimedia Instruction: An Example of the Two-Way Street Between Cognition and Instruction. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 89, 55-71.

Mayer, R. E. (2003). The promise of multimedia learning: Using the same instructional design methods across different media. Learning and Instruction, 13, 125-139.

Mayer, R. E. (2005). Cognitive theory of multimedia learning. In R. E. Mayer (Ed. ), The Cambridg handbook of multimedia learning (pp: 31-48). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Miartella, R.C. and Waldron - soler, K.M. (2005). Language for writing program evaluation. Journal of Direct Insruction , 5, 81-96.

Plass, J. L., Chun, D. M., Mayer, R. E., & Leutner, D. (2003). Cognitive load in reading a foreign language text with multimedia aids and the influence of verbal and spatial abilities. Computers in Human Behavior 19 (2003), 221-243.

Slavien Robert E. (2006). Educational psychology: Theory and Practice 8th ed.

Susan, G. Magliaro., Barbara, B. Lockee., and John, K. Burton. (2005). Direct Instruction Revisited: A Key Model for Instructional Technology, ETR & D, Vol. 53. 41 -55.

Watkins, С. L. (2003). The components of direct instruction. Jurnal of Direct Instruction, 3, 75-110.

Watkins, C. L., and Slocum, T. A. (2004). The components of Direct Instruction. In N. E. Marchand- Martella, T. A. Slocum, & R. C. Martella (Eds. ), Introduction to Direct Instruction. Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon, (pp.28-65).

Show More Hide