Paper Titles in Periodical
International Letters of Social and Humanistic Sciences
ILSHS Volume 61

Subscribe to our Newsletter and get informed about new publication regulary and special discounts for subscribers!

ILSHS > ILSHS Volume 61 > Governance of Citizen Participation and its...
< Back to Volume

Governance of Citizen Participation and its Related Concepts: A Review of Literature

Full Text PDF


This article reviews the concept of citizen participatory governance or citizen participation in public policy-making, a new mode of institutional arrangement increasingly becoming popular in many industrialized democracies. The governance of citizen participation may take different forms, and past studies used different terms in describing the concept. This article take a brief look at various forms of citizen participation (citizen participation in budgeting, collaborative governance, public-private partnership, and citizen coproduction of public service) and explain their concepts as demonstrated in prior research. In a nutshell, this article conclude that these various forms of citizen participation are not well conceptualized in the past literature and calls for future research in this research area with growing importance.


International Letters of Social and Humanistic Sciences (Volume 61)
M. Li, "Governance of Citizen Participation and its Related Concepts: A Review of Literature", International Letters of Social and Humanistic Sciences, Vol. 61, pp. 99-104, 2015
Online since:
October 2015

[1] Abels, G. (2007). Citizen involvement in public policy-making: Does it improve democratic legitimacy and accountability? The case of pTA. Interdisciplinary Information Sciences, 13(1), 103-116.


[2] Ansell, C., & Gash, A. (2008). Collaborative governance in theory and practice. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 18(4), 543-571.


[3] Asquer, A., Street, T., & Square, R. (2012). Co-investment in the Co-production of Public Services: Are Clients Willing to Do It.

[4] Boyle, D., & Harris, M. (2009). The challenge of co-production. London, New Economics Foundation.

[5] Custos, D., & Reitz, J. (2010). Public-Private Partnerships. The American Journal of Comparative Law, 555-584.

[6] Donahue, John (2004). On Collaborative Governance, Corporate Social Responsibility Initiative Working Paper No. 2, Cambridge, MA: John F. Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University.

[7] Donahue, J. D., and Zeckhauser, R. J. (2011). Collaborative Governance: Private Roles for Public Goals in Turbulent Times. Princeton University Press.


[8] Ebdon, C., & Franklin, A. L. (2006). Citizen participation in budgeting theory. Public Administration Review, 66(3), 437-447.


[9] Emerson, K., Nabatchi, T., & Balogh, S. (2012). An integrative framework for collaborative governance. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 22(1), 1-29.


[10] Engel, Eduardo, Ronald Fischer, and Alexander Galetovic. (2010). The Basic Public Finance of Public-Private Partnerships. , Journal of the European Economic Association.


[11] Fagence, M. (2014). Citizen participation in planning. Elsevier.

[12] Fung, A. (2006). Varieties of Participation in Complex Government, Public Administration Review, Vol. 66, Iss. s1, pp.66-75.

[13] Gainous, Jason, and Wagner, K. M. (2014). Tweeting to Power: The Social Media Revolution in American Politics. New York and Oxford: Oxford University Press.


[14] Haruta, C., & Bianca, R. A. D. U. (2010). Citizen Participation in the Decision Making Process at Local and County Levels in the Romanian Public Institutions. Transylvanian Review of Administrative Sciences, 6(31), 76-92.

[15] Hemming, R. (2006). Public-private partnerships. International Monetary Fund.

[16] Hong, S. (2013). Who Benefits from Twitter? Social Media and Political Competition in the U.S. House of Representatives. Government Information Quarterly 30 (4): 464–72. doi: 10. 1016/j. giq. 2013. 05. 009.


[17] Hong, S., D. Nadler (2012) Which candidates do the public discuss online in an election campaign?: The use of social media by 2012 presidential candidate salience. Government Information Quarterly. Vol. 29: 455-461.


[18] Hong, S. (2015a). Citizen Participation in Budgeting: A Tradeoff Between Knowledge and Inclusiveness?, Public Administration Review, Volume 75, Issue 4, July/August 2015, p.572–582. DOI: 10. 1111/puar. 12377.


[19] Hong, S. (2015b). When Does a Public-Private Partnership (PPP) Lead to Inefficient Cost Management?: Evidence from the Korean Urban Rail Transit System, Public Money and Management, forthcoming.


[20] Hong, S. (2015c). Representative Bureaucracy, Organizational Integrity, and Citizen Coproduction: Does an Increase in Police Ethnic Representativeness Reduce Crime? Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, forthcoming.


[21] Irvin, R. A., & Stansbury, J. (2004). Citizen participation in decision making: is it worth the effort?  Public administration review, 64(1), 55-65.


[22] Kelman, S., and Hong, S. (2012).

[23] Kelman, S., Hong, S., & Turbitt, I. (2013).

[24] Kiser, L.L. and Percy, S.L. (1980), The concept of coproduction and its implications for the public service delivery. Working paper No. 80-6 Bloomington, IN: Indiana University.

[25] Levine, C.H., (1984), Citizenship and Service Delivery – the Promise of Co-production, Public Administration Review, Vol. 44, p.178–87.

[26] Löffler, E., Parrado, S., Bovaird, T., & Van Ryzin, G. (2008).

[27] Mandell, M. P. (2001). Collaboration through network structures for community building efforts. National Civic Review, 90, 279–288.


[28] Moore, E., & Koontz, T. (2003). A typology of collaborative watershed groups: Citizenbased, agency-based, and mixed partnerships. Society & Natural Resources, 16, 451–460.


[29] O'Flynn, J. L., & Wanna, J. (2008). Collaborative Governance: A New Era of Public Policy in Australia?. Australia and New Zealand School of Government Series.


[30] O'Leary, R., & Bingham, L. B. (2009). The collaborative public manager: New ideas for the twenty-first century. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.


[31] Partnerships, B. C. (2003). Introduction to Public-Private Partnerships. British Columbia, Canada.

[32] Pestoff, V. (2009). The Third Sector, Citizen Participation and Co-Production of Personal Social Services in Sweden–towards a new paradigm. Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics.


[33] Scott, T. (2015). Does Collaboration Make Any Difference? Linking Collaborative Governance to Environmental Outcomes. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, Vol. 34, No. 3, 537–566 (2015).


[34] Worthington, R., Rask, M., & Minna, L. (2013). Citizen participation in global environmental governance. Routledge.

[35] Zadek, S. (2008). Collaborative governance: The new multilateralism for the 21st century. Global development, 2.

[36] Zhang, Y., & Yang, K. (2009). Citizen participation in the budget process: The effect of city managers. Journal of Public Budgeting, Accounting & Financial Management, 21(2), 289.

[37] Wampler, B. (2007). Participatory Budgeting in Brazil: Contestation, Cooperation, and Accountability. University Park: Penn State University Press.

[38] Whitaker, G. P. (1980). Co-production: citizen participation in service delivery, Public Administration Review, 40, p.240– 246.

Show More Hide
Cited By:

[1] S. Pinzón-Pulido, M. Padial-Espinosa, L. López-Samaniego, B. Navarro-Matillas, P. San Juan-Lozano, J. Espinosa-Almendro, J. Ruiz-Fernández, F. Garrido-Peña, "Creation Process of the Digital Platform to Foster Healthy and Active Aging: enbuenaedad", Frontiers in Public Health, Vol. 7, 2019