Neoliberal Ideology for Transitive Economic: Capitalism vs Socialism

Viter, Dmitriy; Brezhneva-Yermolenko, Olga

doi:10.18052/www.scipress.com/ILSHS.59.131

ILSHS > Volume 59 > Neoliberal Ideology for Transitive Economic:...

< Back to Volume

Neoliberal Ideology for Transitive Economic: Capitalism vs Socialism

Full Text PDF

Abstract:

Contemporary world gained the important experience of the inevitability of a systemic crisis which arising under any circumstances, including the case of suppression of individual principles, individual freedom, which is opposed by neoliberalism. In framework of its basic tenets, the objectification of competition in view of the unpredictability of its results to the public – the notional value in aspect of aspiration of the system to be stable. It requires no less strict regulation, and especially the public, the economy in a capitalist society, than in socialism, the purpose of which is (at the same in both cases) suppression of individual, which implemented in various forms: rise of collective in the socialism and manipulation of individual in the capitalism.

Info:

Periodical:

International Letters of Social and Humanistic Sciences (Volume 59)

Pages:

131-137

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18052/www.scipress.com/ILSHS.59.131

Citation:

D. Viter and O. Brezhneva-Yermolenko, "Neoliberal Ideology for Transitive Economic: Capitalism vs Socialism", International Letters of Social and Humanistic Sciences, Vol. 59, pp. 131-137, 2015

Online since:

September 2015

Authors:

Dmitriy Viter, Olga Brezhneva-Yermolenko

Keywords:

Capitalism, Neoliberalism, Socialism, Transitive Economy

Export:

RIS, BibTeX, Text

Distribution:

Open Access

This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License

References:

[1] Beder S. (2009). Neoliberalism and the global financial crisis. Social Alternatives, no. 8 (1), рр. 17-21.

[2] Hayek F. (1996). Individualism and Economic Order. Chicago: University Of Chicago Press.

[3] Hayek F. (1981). Law, Legislation and Liberty. Vol. 3: The Political Order of a Free People. Chicago: University Of Chicago Press.

[4] MacLean J. (1988). Marxism and International Relations: A Strange Case of Mutual Neglect. Millennium (Journal of International Studies), vol. 17, no. 2, рр. 295-319.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/03058298880170021201

[5] Marx K. (1992). Capital. Volume I. A Critique of Political Economy. London: Penguin Classics.

[6] Mises L. (1962). Bureaucracy. New Haven, Connecticut: Yale University Press, Libertarian Press, Liberty Fund.

[7] Mises L. (2010). Human Action: A Treatise on Economics. New Haven, Connecticut: Yale University Press, Ludwig von Mises Institute.

[8] Ramirez S. (2002). Fear and Social Capitalism: The Law and Macroeconomics of Investor Confidence. Washburn Law Journal, vol. 42, рр. 31-77.

[9] Strange S. (1986). Casino Capitalism. London: Blackwell.

Show More Hide

Cited By:

[1] C. Rossatto, M. Dickerson, Handbook of Research on Cross-Cultural Online Learning in Higher Education, p. 138, 2019

DOI: https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-5225-8286-1.ch008