Paper Titles in Periodical
International Letters of Social and Humanistic Sciences
Volume 56

Subscribe

Subscribe to our Newsletter and get informed about new publication regulary and special discounts for subscribers!

ILSHS > Volume 56 > Objective Cultural Capital and Environmental...
< Back to Volume

Objective Cultural Capital and Environmental Behaviors (Case Study: Sanandaj City)

Full Text PDF

Abstract:

One of important areas of interest in sociology is the so-called environmental or pro-environmental behavior. In response to the rapidly growing global environmental problems many call for changes in how individuals should deal with the environment. An important aspect of moving towards an environmentally sustainable world is to promote pro-environmental behavior. This paper investigates the cultural factors that affect on people's Environmental Behaviors on Sanandaj City. This paper is a survey study by control of terms, is a broaden study by extended and is a cutting study by time (in the first half of 2015). The population is the entire person that has citizens in Sanandaj city. The sample size based on kockran formula is 320. The questionnaires with suitable structures validity (based on Kronbach’s coefficient of Alfa) in the ratio of age, sex in deferent areas have been distributed. Results indicate that the most effective variable on Environmental Behaviors of citizens is Objective Cultural Capital.

Info:

Periodical:
International Letters of Social and Humanistic Sciences (Volume 56)
Pages:
138-144
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18052/www.scipress.com/ILSHS.56.138
Citation:
Y. Ahmadi "Objective Cultural Capital and Environmental Behaviors (Case Study: Sanandaj City)", International Letters of Social and Humanistic Sciences, Vol. 56, pp. 138-144, 2015
Online since:
Jul 2015
Authors:
Yaghoub Ahmadi
Keywords:
Behavior, Belief, Citizen, Cultural Capital, Environment
Export:
RIS, BibTeX, Text
Distribution:
Open Access

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License

References:

Abrahamse, W., Steg, L., Gifford, R., & Vlek, C. (2009). Factors influencing car use and the intention to reduce it: A question of morality? Transportation Research Part F: Psychology and Behavior, 12, 317-324.

Abrahamse, W., Steg, L., Vlek, C., & Rothengatter, T. (2005). A review of intervention studies aimed at household energy conservation. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 25, 273- 291.

Adams, J. (1995). Risk. London: Routledge, Taylor, & Francis.

Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50, 179-211.

Allport, G. W. (1954). The historical background of modern social psychology. In G. Lindzey, (Ed. ), Handbook of social psychology (Vol. 1, pp.3-56). Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.

Ando, K., Ohnuma, S., Blöbaum, A., Matthies, E., & Sugiura, J. (2010). Determinants of individual and collective pro-environmental behaviors: Comparing Germany and Japan. Journal of Environmental Information Science, 38, 21-32.

Arcury, T. A., & Christianson, E. H. (1993). Rural-urban differences in environmental knowledge and actions. Journal of Environmental Education, 25, 19-25.

Arcury, T. A., Scollay, S. J., & Johnson, T. P. (1987). Sex differences in environmental concern and knowledge: The case of acid rain. Sex Roles, 16, 463-472.

Arp, W., & Boekelman, K. (1997).

Axelrod, L. J., & Lehman, D. R. (1993). Responding to environmental concerns: What factors guide individual action? Journal of Environmental Psychology, 13, 149-159.

Baldassare, M., & Katz, C. (1992). The personal threat of environmental problems as predictor of environmental practices. Environment and Behavior, 24, 602-616.

Balderjahn, I. (1988). Personality variables and environmental attitudes as predictors of ecologically responsible consumption patterns. Journal of Business Research, 17, 51-56.

Bamberg, S, & Möser, G. (2007). Twenty years after Hines, Hungerford, and Tomera: A new meta-analysis of psycho-social determinants of pro-environmental behaviour. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 27, 14-25.

Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84, 191-215.

Bassett, G. W., Jr., Jenkins-Smith, H. C., & Silva, C. (1996). Onsite storage of high level nuclear waste: Attitudes and perceptions of local residents. Risk Analysis, 16, 309-319.

Bechtel, R. B., Verdugo, V. C., & Pinheiro, J. D. Q. (1999). Environmental belief systems: United States, Brazil, and Mexico. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 30, 122-128.

Biel, A., & Nilsson, A, (2005). Religious values and environmental concern: Harmony and detachment. Social Science Quarterly, 86, 178-191.

Bjerke, T., & Kaltenborn, B. P. (1999). The relationship of ecocentric and anthropocentric motives to attitudes toward large carnivores. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 19, 415- 421.

Blocker, T. J., & Eckberg, D. L. (1997). Gender and environmentalism: Results from the 1993 General Social Survey. Social Science Quarterly, 78, 841-858.

Bogner, F. X , & Wiseman, M (1997). Environmental perception of rural and urban pupils.

Urien, B., & Kilbourne, W. (2011). Generativity and self-enhancement values in eco-friendly behavioral intentions and environmentally responsible consumption behavior. Psychology and Marketing, 28, 69-90. doi: 10. 1002/mar.

Uyeki, E. S., & Holland, L. J. (2000). Diffusion of pro environmental attitudes. American Behavioral Scientist, 43, 646-662.

Van Liere, K. D., & Dunlap, R. E. (1980). The social bases of environmental concern: A review of hypotheses, explanations, and empirical evidence. Public Opinion Quarterly, 44, 181-197.

Walton, T., & Austin, D. M. (2011). Pro-environmental behavior in an urban structural context. Sociological Spectrum, 31, 260-287. doi: 10.

White, L. (1967). The historical roots of our ecological crisis. Science, 155, 1203-1207.

Whitmarsh, L. (2009). Behavioural responses to climate change: Asymmetry of intentions and impacts. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 29, 13-23.

Whitney, E. (1993). Lynn White, ecotheology, and history. Environmental Ethics, 15, 151- 169.

Wolkomir, M., Futreal, M., Wooddrum, E., & Hoban, T. (1997). Substantive religious belief and environmentalism. Social Science Quarterly, 78, 96-108.

Woodrum, E., & Hoban, T. (1994). Theology and religiosity effects on environmentalism. Review of Religious Research, 35, 193-206.

Wright, S. D., Caserta, M., & Lund, D. A (2003). Older adults' attitudes, concerns, and support for environmental issues in the new west., International Journal of Aging & Human Development, 57, 151-179.

Show More Hide