Paper Titles in Periodical
International Letters of Social and Humanistic Sciences
Volume 52

Subscribe

Subscribe to our Newsletter and get informed about new publication regulary and special discounts for subscribers!

ILSHS > Volume 52 > Willingness to Communicate and its Relationship...
< Back to Volume

Willingness to Communicate and its Relationship with Emotional Intelligence and Gender Differences

Full Text PDF

Abstract:

As a matter of fact, contemporary universal education gives prominence on authentic communication as an ultimate goal of language learning. Language teaching and learning processes are among the most important and complex human endeavors which is the result of the complicated nature of human beings. Therefore, a successful language learner is the one who is capable of dealing with complexities of teaching-learning processes. Various recent learner-fronted teaching methodologies have underscored the notion of learner-initiated communication which is known as willingness to communicate (WTC). To date, various variables have been discovered by scholars to be influential in the satisfactory flow of communication among students in the language classrooms. Another variable analyzed in the present study is the potential relationship between learners’ gender and WTC as well as their emotional intelligence (EQ-i). Therefore, the present study tries to investigate the possible go-togetherness between learners’ willingness to communicate and their emotional intelligence. Two questionnaires of Bar-On’s (1997) emotional quotient inventory and McCrosky’s (1992) willingness to communicate scale were administered to a total of 100 academic EFL learners. After obtaining the raw data, the SPSS software (version17) was used to change the data into numerical interpretable forms. Correlation analysis revealed that there is positive correlation between learner’s willingness to communicate and their emotional intelligence level. Furthermore, the findings characterized females as the outperforming group both in terms of emotional intelligence and willingness to communicate.

Info:

Periodical:
International Letters of Social and Humanistic Sciences (Volume 52)
Pages:
87-94
DOI:
10.18052/www.scipress.com/ILSHS.52.87
Citation:
L. Gholami "Willingness to Communicate and its Relationship with Emotional Intelligence and Gender Differences", International Letters of Social and Humanistic Sciences, Vol. 52, pp. 87-94, 2015
Online since:
May 2015
Authors:
Export:
Distribution:
References:

[1] Arnold, J., & Brown, H. D. (1999). A map of the terrain. In J. Arnold (Ed. ), Affect in language learning (pp.75-108). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

[2] Baghaei, P., Dourakhshan, A., & Salavati, O. (2012). The relationship between willingness to communicate and success in learning English as a foreign language. MJAL, 4(2), 53-67.

[3] Bar-On, R. (1997). The emotional quotient inventory (EQ-i): A test of emotional intelligence. Toronto: Multi-Health Systems.

[4] Bar-On, R. (2000). Emotional and social intelligence. Insights from the emotional quotient inventory (EQ-I). In: Bar-On, R., Parker, J. D. (Eds. ), The Handbook of Emotional Intelligence. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco. (pp.363-388).

DOI: 10.1016/s0191-8869(99)00139-7

[5] Birjandi, P., & Amiri, M. (2011). Willingness to communicate in the first language acquisition: A case study on Iranian 2-year old kids. European Journal of Social Sciences, 23(1), 44-55.

[6] Gardner, H. (1983). Frames of mind: The theory of multiple intelligences. New York, NY: Basic Books.

[7] Ghonsooly, B., Khajavy, G. H., & Asadpour, S. F. (2012).

[8] Goleman, D. (1995). Emotional intelligence: Why it can matter more than IQ. New York, NY: Bantam Books.

[9] Goleman, D. (2001). An EI-Based theory of performance. In C. Cherniss, & D. Goleman (Eds. ), The emotionally intelligent workplace (pp.27-44). San Francisco: Jossey Bass.

[10] Kang, S. J. (2005).

[11] MacIntyre, P. D., & Charos, C. (1996). Personality, attitudes, and affect as predictors of second language communication. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 15(1), 3e26.

DOI: 10.1177/0261927x960151001

[12] MacIntyre, P. D., & Legatto, J. J. (2011). A dynamic system approach to willingness to communicate: Developing an idiodynamic method to capture rapidly changing affect. Applied Linguistics, 32, 149-171. doi: 10. 1093/applin/amq037.

DOI: 10.1093/applin/amq037

[13] Maclntyre, P. D., Clement, R., Dorneyei,Z., & Noels, K. A. (199g). Conceptualizing willingness to communicate in a L2: A situational model of L2 confidence and affiliation. Modern Language Journal, 82, 545_562.

DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-4781.1998.tb05543.x

[14] MacIntyre, P.D., & Doucette, J. (2010). Willingness to communicate and action control. System, 38(2), 161-171.

DOI: 10.1016/j.system.2009.12.013

[15] Matthews, G., Zeidner, M., & Roberts, R. D. (2002). Emotional intelligence: Science &myth. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press.

[16] Meng, X., & Wang, Q. (2006). Psychological factors and teachers' language. US- China Foreign Language, 4(5), 70-73.

[17] McCroskey, J. (1992). Reliability and Validity of the Willingness to Communicate Scale.

[18] Communication Quarterly, 40(1), 16-25. http: /dx. doi. org/10. 1080/01463379209369817.

[19] McCroskey, P. D., & Baer, J. E. (1985). Willingness to Communicate: the Construct and its Measurement. Paper presented at the annual convention of the Speech Communication Association, Denver, CO.

[20] Murphy, K. T. (2006).

[21] Peng, J. (2007).

[22] Reinders, H., & Wattana, S. (2011). Learn English or Die: The effects of digital games on interaction and willingness to communicate in a foreign language. Digital Culture &Education, 3(1), 3-29.

DOI: 10.1057/9781137005267.0015

[23] Sallinen-Kuparinen, A., McCroskey, J. C., & Richmond, V. P. (1991).

[24] Salovey, P., & Mayer, J .D. (1990). Emotional Intelligence, Imagination, Cognition, and Personality, 9, 195-211.

[25] Samouei, R. (2005). Emotional intelligence test. Tehran: Sina Institute.

[26] Wright, M. (1999). Influences on learner attitudes towards foreign language and culture. Educational Research, 41, 197-208.

DOI: 10.1080/0013188990410207
Show More Hide