Paper Titles in Periodical
International Letters of Social and Humanistic Sciences
Volume 51

Subscribe

Subscribe to our Newsletter and get informed about new publication regulary and special discounts for subscribers!

ILSHS > Volume 51 > Diverging Concepts of the other in Islam: A...
Diverging Concepts of the other in Islam: A Comparison between the Original Islamic Perception and Contemporary Muslims’ Practice
< Back to Volume

Diverging Concepts of the other in Islam: A Comparison between the Original Islamic Perception and Contemporary Muslims’ Practice

Full Text PDF

Abstract:

During the time of Prophet Muhammad in Madinah, Muslims’ understanding of the Concept of the other was strictly similar to the one described in the Holy Quranic verses. The Prophet himself provides an exemplary practice of the Islamic view of the Other in writing a constitution for people of different religions, tribes, races and ethnicities, living in Madinah. Those others who had agreed to that constitution were allowed to worship in their own way and follow their own religious law, and were given a degree of self-government. However, After Prophet Muhammad, Muslims’ conceptions of the other greatly changed partly because of political reasons and conflicts among themselves and in most cases, because of the western colonization of many Muslim countries. The purpose of this paper is to deal with the diverging concepts of the other in Islam. It makes close readings of some Quranic verses revealed in the holy cities of Makka and Madinah and finds that the theoretical concept of the other, as represented in the Quran is based upon positive difference among peoples and communities. Then the paper sheds light on two instances of how Prophet Muhammad positively applied this concept, namely, “The Last Sermon and the Madinah Charter.” Next, it surveys the manifestations of the concept of otherness in contemporary theory and practice, especially with reference to colonialism. The last section of this paper tries to interpret the radical changes that have turned the Muslim concept of the other from a positive one to a completely negative view of the other. Muslim contemporary othering is a comprehensive process that is divided by the researchers into exterior othering related to non-Muslims and domestic othering related to Muslims among themselves.

Info:

Periodical:
International Letters of Social and Humanistic Sciences (Volume 51)
Pages:
57-71
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18052/www.scipress.com/ILSHS.51.57
Citation:
M. S.’aban Deyab and G. Elgezeery, "Diverging Concepts of the other in Islam: A Comparison between the Original Islamic Perception and Contemporary Muslims’ Practice", International Letters of Social and Humanistic Sciences, Vol. 51, pp. 57-71, 2015
Online since:
May 2015
Authors:
Mohammad Sha’aban Deyab, Gamal Elgezeery
Keywords:
Colonialism, Domestic Othering, Exterior Othering, Islam, Madinah Charter, Othering
Export:
RIS, BibTeX, Text
Distribution:
Open Access

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License

References:

[1] Anderson, J.M. 2004. Lessons from a Postcolonial-Feminist Perspective: Suffering and a Path to Healing., Nursing Inquiry, 11(4): 238-246.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1440-1800.2004.00231.x

[2] Armstrong, Karen. 2002. The Curse of the Infidel., The Guardian, June 20. http: /www. guardian. co. uk/world/2002/jun/20/religion. september11 (Accessed on September 12, 2014).

[3] Can, Sefik. 2005. Fundamentals of Rumi's Thought. Ed. and Trans. Zeki Saritoprak. New Jersey: The Light, Inc.

[4] Cordeiro, Jose Luis. 2009. Constitutions around the World: A View from Latin America Germany: Lap-Lambert Academic Publishing.

[5] Cornell, Drucilla. 1992. The Philosophy of the Limit. New York: Routledge.

[6] Coupland, Nikolas. 1999. Other Representation., In Handbook of pragmatics, edited by Jef Verschueren et al., 1-24. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.

[7] Crane, Robert D. 2009. Islamic Social Principle of the Right to Freedom (Haqq al-Hurriyah): An Analytical Approach., Arches Quarterly, 3 (4): 5-14.

[8] Derrida, Jacques. 1978. Writing and Difference. Trans. Alan Bass. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

[9] Elgezeery, Gamal. 2013. Cross-Referencing Nature and Culture in Nol Alembong's Forest Echoes., International Journal of English and Literature, 3 (2): 27-40.

[10] Elgezeery, Gamal. 2014. Human Objectification in Carol Ann Duffy's The World's Wife. Saarbrucken, Germany: Lap Lambert Academic Publishing.

[11] Engelund, Sara Rismyhr. 2011. Introductory essay: 'The other' and 'Othering, ', New Narratives: Multicultural Literature at the University of Oslo, issue 2, http: /newnarratives. wordpress. com/issue-2-the-other/other-and-othering-2/ (Accessed on 10 September 2014).

[12] Hagglund, Martin. 2004. The Necessity of Discrimination: Disjoining Derrida and Lévinas, Diacritics: A review of Contemporary Criticism. 34 (1): 40-71.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1353/dia.2006.0022

[13] Harle, Vilho. 2000. The Enemy with a Thousand Faces: The Tradition of the Other in Western Political Thought and History. Westport, CT: Praeger Publishers.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/s000305540231431x

[14] Joffe, Hélène. 1999. Risk and The Other,. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

[15] Kearney, Richard. 2003. Strangers, Gods and Monsters Interpreting Otherness. London: Routledge.

[16] Kleidosty, Jeremy. 2011. From Madinah to Runnymede: Comparing the Foundational Legacies of the Constitution of Madinah And The Magna Carta., New Middle Eastern Studies, 1: 1-14. http: /www. brismes. ac. uk/nmes/wp-content/uploads/2011/11/NMES2011Kleidosty. pdf (accessed September 11, 2014).

[17] Marchetti, Gina. 1993. Romance and the Yellow Peril. Berkeley: University of California Press.

[18] Melamed, Abraham. 2003. The Image of the Black in Jewish Culture: A History of the Other. Trans. Betty Sigler Rozen. New York: RoutledgeCurzon.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203220993

[19] Neumann, Iver B. 1999. Uses of the Other: The East, in European Identity Formation. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

[20] Prophet Muhammad's Last Sermon (http: /www. stanford. edu/~jamila/Sermon. html).

[21] Quran. Bilingual Edition: Arabic-English. Trans. Muhammad Asad.

[22] Tahir-ul-Qadri, Dr. Muhammad. 2000. Constitutional Analysis of the Constitution of Madinah. Minhaj-ul-Quran Publications.

[23] Toss, Liliane, and Salomon Diaz. 2012. Embracing the Arab Speaking Community in the Cultural Diversity of the American Society., http: /forest. huntington. edu/cccda/files/2009/05/toss-the-arab-speaking-revised. pdf (Accessed on December 20, 2012).

[24] Toynbee, Arnold J. 1948. Civilization on Trial. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

[25] Volf, Miroslav. 1996. Exclusion and Embrace: A Theological Exploration of Identity, Otherness, and Reconciliation. Nashville: Abingdon Press.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/004057369905600213

[26] Waardenburg, Jacques. 1999. Muslim Perceptions of Other Religions: A Historical Survey. New York and Oxford: Oxford University Press.

[27] Watt, W. Montgomery. 1956. Muhammad at Medina. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

[28] Wingfield, Nancy M. 2003. Creating the Other: Ethnic Conflict and Nationalism in Habsburg Central Europe. New York: Berghahn Books.

[29] White, Sean William. 2014. Medina Charter of Prophet Muhammad and Pluralism. " January 23. http: /www. islamicity. com/Articles/articles. asp, ref=IC1102-4508 (accessed 9 September 2014).

[30] Weedon, Chris. 2004. Identity and Culture: Narratives of Difference and Belonging. Berkshire, UK: Open University Press.

[31] Yildirim, Yetkin. 2006. Peace and Conflict Resolution in the Medina Charter, Peace Review: A Journal of Social Justice. 18 (1): 109-17. ( Received 24 April 2015; accepted 06 May 2015 ).

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10402650500510750
Show More Hide