Paper Titles in Periodical
International Letters of Social and Humanistic Sciences
Volume 49

Subscribe

Subscribe to our Newsletter and get informed about new publication regulary and special discounts for subscribers!

ILSHS > Volume 49 > Political Practice of Literary Analysis: How to...
Political Practice of Literary Analysis: How to Read Literature more Closely
< Back to Volume

Political Practice of Literary Analysis: How to Read Literature more Closely

Full Text PDF

Abstract:

The development of literary/textual analysis is becoming increasingly interdisciplinary; inter-textual, historically and socially-aware, and politically-motivated critical practices. This study is an attempt to show how literary/textual analyses are relied on a number of interrelated, competing and methodological political arrangements. In brief, this article is an account of the development of critically and politically-aware practices of literary analysis and implicitly inculcate that how literary analysis can be done employing political interpretations. Hence, some key concepts for critical practice of literary analysis such as interdiscourse, intertextuality, ideology negotiation and feminist/political criticisms of literature are investigated. Finally, an example of a politically committed analysis of literature is provided to show how theoretical foundations function in practice.

Info:

Periodical:
International Letters of Social and Humanistic Sciences (Volume 49)
Pages:
92-105
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18052/www.scipress.com/ILSHS.49.92
Citation:
M. S. Khaghaninejad "Political Practice of Literary Analysis: How to Read Literature more Closely", International Letters of Social and Humanistic Sciences, Vol. 49, pp. 92-105, 2015
Online since:
March 2015
Authors:
Mohammad Saber Khaghaninejad
Keywords:
Ideology Negotiation, Interdiscourse, Intertextuality, Literary Analysis, Political Interpretation, Textual Analysis
Export:
RIS, BibTeX, Text
Distribution:
Open Access

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License

References:

Heidegger, M. (1971). Poetry, Language, Thought. London: Harper & Row.

Eagleton, T. (1983). Literary Theory: An Introduction, Oxford: Basil Blackwell.

Derrida, J. (1979). Margins of Philosophy. Brighton: Harvester Press.

Bloom, H. (1979). The breaking of form. MIT Press.

Hartman, G. (1980). Criticism in the Wilderness: The Study of Literature Today, New Haven: Yale University Press.

Harland, R. (1987). Superstructuralism: The Philosophy of Structuralism and PostStructuralism, London: Methuen.

Keyser, S.J. (1983). There is method in their adness: the formal structure of advertisement. New Literary History, 14(2), 305-34.

Edwards, C.L. (1984). Stop me if you've heard this one: narrative disclaimers as breakthrough into performance. Formula, 25(3), 214-28.

Foucault, M. (1972). The Archeology of Knowledge. London: Tavistock.

Fairclough, N. (1988). Register, power and socio-semantic change. England: Rutledge publications.

Said, E. (1983). The World, The Text, and the Critic. Cambridge. Mass.: Harvard University Press.

Eagleton, T. (1976), Criticism and Ideology: A Study in Marxist Literary Theory, London: Verso.

Macherey, P. (1978). A Theory of Literary Production. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.

Bakhtin, M. (1930). Rabelais and His World. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.

Kristeva, J. (1980). Desire in Language: A Semiotic Approach to Literature and Art. New York: Columbia University Press.

Fowler, R. (1981). Literature as Social Discourse: The Practice of Linguistic Criticism. London: Batsford.

Norris, C. (1984). The Deconstructive Turn. Essays in the Rhetoric of Philosoph. London: Methuen.

Millett, K. (1969). Sexual Politics. London: Virago.

Eisenstein, Z.R. (1979). Capitalist Patriarchy and the Case of Social Feminism, New York: Monthly Review.

Kelly-Gadol, J. (1976). The social relations of the sexes: methodological implications of women's history. Sign, 1, 809-24.

Moi, T. (1985). Sexual/Textual Politics: Feminist Literary Theory, London: Methuen.

Hadigheh, S. & Khaghaninejad, M. S. (2013). How to apply critical linguistics in English/Persian literary works' criticism. International Journal of Linguistics, 5(4), 90- 108.

Showalter, E. (1985). Toward a feminist poetics. Harvard University Press.

Godard, B. (1985). Redrawing the circle; Power, poetics, language. Harvard University Press.

Irigaray, L. (1977). Ce sexe qui n'en est pas un. Paris: Minuit.

Lacan, J. (1977) Ecrits, Paris: Seuil.

Ragland-Sullivan, E. (1984). The magnetism between reader and text: prolegomena to a Lacanian poetics. Poetics, 13, 381-406.

Kuhn, T. S. (1962). The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago: Chicago University Press.

Burton, D. (1982). Through glass darkly: through dark glasses. Carter series.

Johnson, C. (1986). The Song Circle of Jacky and Selected Poems, Melbourne: Hyland House.

Roberts, F. (1971). Being an Aboriginal in Australian Society' in Racism in Australia. Tasks for General and Christian Education. Melbourne Conference: Division of Christian Education.

Ellis, J. (1977). Visible Fictions. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.

Frow, J. (1986). Marxism and Literary History, Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press. ( Received 19 February 2015; accepted 27 February 2015 ).

Show More Hide