The Identity of the Political Language, Compared to other Types of Language

Mocanu, Mihaela

doi:10.18052/www.scipress.com/ILSHS.45.35

ILSHS > ILSHS Volume 45 > The Identity of the Political Language, Compared...

< Back to Volume

The Identity of the Political Language, Compared to other Types of Language

Full Text PDF

Abstract:

The existence of a political language implies recognising a stability of the linguistic code, outside the concrete situations of communication. Anyone who listens to the speech of a politician ascertains that he uses particular wording and phrases, manifests fondness for specific topics, makes appeal to a specific rhetoric, employs an adequate intonation, all aimed at facilitating the achievement of his objectives. The audience recognises immediately this type of language, which means that the political language has a distinctive identity, at the level of the content and of the expression as well, compared to the other types of language, even if, often, it valorises the contents and the expressions specific to these languages. In our study, we present a contrastive analysis of the political language, compared to other types of language (scientific, philosophical, religious, legal, artistic), aimed at identifying the defining notes, but also the convergence area that exist among them.

Info:

Periodical:

International Letters of Social and Humanistic Sciences (Volume 45)

Pages:

35-46

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18052/www.scipress.com/ILSHS.45.35

Citation:

M. Mocanu, "The Identity of the Political Language, Compared to other Types of Language", International Letters of Social and Humanistic Sciences, Vol. 45, pp. 35-46, 2015

Online since:

January 2015

Authors:

Mihaela Mocanu

Keywords:

Contrastive Analysis, Language Taxonomies, Political Language

Export:

RIS, BibTeX, Text

Distribution:

Open Access

This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License

References:

Chivu, Gheorghe, (1997), Consideraţii asupra limbajului bisericesc actual, Editura Academiei, Bucureşti.

Codoban, Aurel, (2005), Filosofia ca gen literar, Ediţia a II-a, Idea Design&Print Editură, Cluj Napoca.

Coteanu, Ion, (1973, 1975), Stilistica funcţională a limbii române, 2 vol., Editura Academiei, Bucureşti.

Edelman, M., (1999), Politica şi utilizarea simbolurilor, traduction by Ruxandra Nichita, Polirom, Iaşi.

Habermas, Jurgen, (1983), Cunoaştere şi comunicare, traduction by Andrei Marga, Walter Roth şi Iosif Wolf, Editura Politică, Bucureşti.

Marga, Delia, (2004), Repere în analiza discursului politic, Editura Fundaţiei pentru Studii Europene, Cluj-Napoca.

Mastacan, Simina, (2004), Discursul implicit al dreptului, Editura Junimea, Iaşi.

Liiceanu, Gabriel, (1992), Cearta cu filozofia. Eseuri, Humanitas, Bucureşti.

Oprea, Ioan, (2001), Curs de filosofia limbii, Editura Universităţii Suceava, Suceava.

Sălăvăstru, Constantin, (2009), Discursul puterii, Editura Tritonic, Bucureşti.

Wald, H., (1983), Ideea vine vorbind, Cartea Românească, Bucureşti.

Wittgenstein, Ludwig, (1993), Caietul Albastru, traduction by Mircea Flonta, Mircea Dumitru and Adrian-Paul Iliescu, Humanitas, Bucureşti.

Zafiu, Rodica, (2007), Limbaj şi politică, Editura Universităţii din Bucureşti, Bucureşti.

Show More Hide

Cited By:

This article has no citations.