Subscribe to our Newsletter and get informed about new publication regulary and special discounts for subscribers!

ILSHS > Volume 44 > The Relationship among Information and...
< Back to Volume

The Relationship among Information and Communication Technologies and GDP in Middle East Countries: Panel Cointegration Approach

Full Text PDF


This paper studies the causality relationship between Foreign Direct Investment and Information and Communication Technologies based on panel data covering Middle East countries during the period 1990-2010. The empirical results support of a short-run cointegration relationship after allowing for the heterogeneous country effect. The long-run relationship is estimated using a full-modified OLS. Pedroni's heterogeneous panel cointegration test reveals have long-run equilibrium relationship between FDI and economic growth. The analysis of results indicate that the growth contribution of ICT and FDI was quite low for these countries. The econometric results showed a positive and significant impact of ICT and FDI in these countries.


International Letters of Social and Humanistic Sciences (Volume 44)
M. Mehrara et al., "The Relationship among Information and Communication Technologies and GDP in Middle East Countries: Panel Cointegration Approach", International Letters of Social and Humanistic Sciences, Vol. 44, pp. 13-20, 2015
Online since:
Dec 2014

Al-Iriani, Mahmoud and Fatima Al-Shamsi. (2008) Foreign Direct Investment and Economic Growth in the GCC Countries: A Causality Investigation Using Heterogeneous Panel Analysis.

Barro, R. (1991) Economic growth in a cross section of countries. Quarterly Journal of Economics 106(2): 407-433.

Barro, R. and Sala-i-Martin, X. (1995) Economic Growth. New York: McGraw-Hill.

Chowdhury, A. and Mavrotas, G. (2006) FDI and growth: What causes what? The World Economy 29(1): 9-19.

Dimelisa, P. S and Papaioannou, K. S (2010) FDI and ICT Effects on Productivity Growth: A Comparative Analysis of Developing and Developed Countries. European Journal of Development Research 22(2): 79-96.

Engle, R., Granger, C., 1987. Cointegration and error correction: representation, estimation, and testing. Econometrica 55, 257-276.

Hadri, K., 2000. Testing for stationarity in heterogeneous panel data. Econometrics Journal 3(1), 148-161.

Hall, B.H. and Mairesse, J. (1995) Exploring the relationship between R&D and productivity in French manufacturing firms. Journal of Econometrics 65(1): 263-293.

Harris, R. (1995) Communication costs and trade. Canadian Journal of Economics 28(s1): 46-75.

Im, K.S., Pesaran, M.H., Shin, Y., (1997). Testing for unit roots in heterogeneous panels. Working paper. University of Cambridge.

IMF (2003). International Financial Statistics. Washington DC: International Monetary Fund.

Levine, A., Lin, C.F., (1993). Unit root tests in panel data: asymptotic and finite sample properties, working paper. Department of Economics, University of California at San Diego.

Louzi B. Mohammed and Abadi, Abeer (2011). The impact of foreign direct investment on economic growth in Jordan. IJRRAS 8(2): 253-259.

Pedroni, P. (1999). Critical values for cointegration tests in heterogeneous panels with multiple regressors. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics 61(2), 653-670.

Pedroni, P., (2000). Full modified OLS for heterogeneous cointegrated panels. Nonstationary Panels Panel Cointegration and Dynamic Panels, Advances in Econometrics, 15(1): 93-130.

Tiwari, M. (2008) ICTs and poverty reduction: User perspective study of rural Madhya Pradesh, India. The European Journal of Development Research 20(3): 448-461.

World Bank (2011). Global Development Finance. Washington DC. ( Received 08 November 2014; accepted 16 November 2014 ).

Show More Hide