This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
[1] Antonio Sandu, Elena Unguru (2014). Acțiune comunicativă, justiție deliberativă și restaurativă. București: Editura Tritonic.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.18662/po/2015.0601.15[2] Andrzej Borowski, International Letters of Social and Humanistic Sciences 14 (2014) 33-41.
[3] Antonio Sandu (2014). Elemente de sociologie. Sociologie generală, sociologie juridică, metodologia cercetării sociale. București: Editura Tritonic.
[4] D. Balahur (2001). Fundamente socio-juridice ale probațiunii. Iași: Editura Bit.
[5] Sebastian Kot, Beata Ślusarczyk (2014). IT Role in Supply Chain Collaboration. Current Communication Difficulties, 165.
[6] Mihai Coman (1999). Introducere în sistemul mass-media. Polirom.
[7] Andrzej Borowski, International Letters of Social and Humanistic Sciences 6 (2013) 86-90.
[8] Elena Unguru, Antonio Sandu (2014). A Socio-Legal Approach of Probation in Light of the New Penal Code. Restorative Justice Versus Retributive Justice. European.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.18662/eljpa.2014.0101.04[9] Janusz Grabara, Michal Kolcun, Sebastian Kot, International Journal of Education and Research 2(2) (2014).
[10] A. Sandu (2009). Tehnici afirmativ-apreciative. O sociopedagogie a succesului. Lumen.
[11] A. Caras, A. Sandu, Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences 149 (2014) 142-151.
[12] A. Sandu, Postmodern Openings 3 (2014) 49-66.
[13] Paula Bajdor, Iwona Grabara, Journal of Studies in Social Sciences 7(2) (2014).
[14] J. H. Gasderell, International Letters of Social and Humanistic Science 22 (2014) 85-91.
[15] Antonio Sandu (2014). Social Construction of Reality. Epistemic, Ethical and Pragmatic Dimensions. Habilitation Thesis, Stefan cel Mare University, in progress.
[16] D. Cooperrider, D. Whitney, J. Stavros (2005). Appreciative Inquiry Handbook. The First in a Series in a AI Books for Leaders of Change. Brunswick: Crown Custom Publishing Inc.
[17] Joanna Tabor, Journal of Management Studies 9(1) (2014) 233-243.
[18] Ștefan Cojocaru (2005). Metode apreciative în asistența socială: ancheta, supervizarea, studiul de caz. Polirom.
[19] J. Habermas (1987). Theory of Communicative Action. Volume 2, Boston: Beacon Press.
[20] Andrzej Borowski, International Letters of Social and Humanistic Sciences 14 (2014) 7-17.
[21] D. Cojocaru, A. Sandu, S. Cojocaru, Journal for the Study of Religions and Ideologies 28 (2011) 65-83.
[22] Maria Nowicka-Skowron, Sorin Mihai Radu (2014). Innovation process modelling. Current Communication Difficulties, 104.
[23] O. M. Cuichi, A. Sandu, Revista de cercetare şi intervenţie socială 30 (2010) 53-62.
[24] S. Cojocaru, Revista de Cercetare şi Intervenţie Socială 26 (2009) 76-86.
[25] Max G. Craig, Journal of Studies in Social Sciences 8(1) (2014).
[26] Marin Drămnescu (2014). Communication. Political speech. Populist speech. Topical Communication Uncertainties, 242.
[27] Vladimir Aurelian Enăchescu (2014). Teaching-communication barriers. Analysis and solutions. Current Communication Difficulties, 277.
[28] Ștefan Vlăduţescu (2014). Actants of manipulative communication. International.
[29] S. Cojocaru, A. Sandu, S. Ponea, Social Research Reports 8 (2010).
[30] A. Borowski, International Letters of Social and Humanistic Sciences 27 (2014) 100-110.
[31] A. Sandu, E. Unguru, Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences 82 (2013) 386-391.
[32] A. Borowski, International Letters of Social and Humanistic Sciences 4 (2013) 70-74.
[33] J. Habermas (1998). Sfera publică şi transformarea ei structurală. Studiul unei categorii a societăţii burgheze. Bucureşti: Editura Univers.
[34] J. Habermas (2000). Conştiinţă morală şi acţiune comunicativă. Bucureşti: Editura All Educaţional.
[35] Jason L. Powell, International Letters of Social and Humanistic Sciences 17(1) (2014) 1-60. ( Received 25 October 2014; accepted 03 November 2014 ).