Paper Titles in Periodical
International Letters of Social and Humanistic Sciences
Volume 41

Subscribe to our Newsletter and get informed about new publication regulary and special discounts for subscribers!

ILSHS > Volume 41 > Constructive-Feedback: An Educational District...
< Back to Volume

Constructive-Feedback: An Educational District Forma Theory to Practice in ELF Teacher Education

Full Text PDF


The aim of this study is to familiarize the readers with some key and basic issues about feedback which is an educational district these days, in a coherent and tangible manner. In this paper, through using relevant literature, issues such as teacher education, good language teaching constructive feedback, types of feedback and its effect on educational environment of language teachers are discussed.


International Letters of Social and Humanistic Sciences (Volume 41)
D. Pourmandnia and B. Behfrouz, "Constructive-Feedback: An Educational District Forma Theory to Practice in ELF Teacher Education", International Letters of Social and Humanistic Sciences, Vol. 41, pp. 123-137, 2014
Online since:
September 2014

Ammar, A., & Spada, N. (2006). One Size Fits All? Recasts, Prompts and L2 Learning. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 28, 543-574.

Ancker, W. (2000). Errors and Corrective Feedback: Updated Theory and Classroom Practice. Forum, 38 (4), 20-28. Retrieved June 21, 2007 from http: /exchanges. state. gov/forum/vols/vol38/no4/p.20. htm.

Ashwell, T. (2000). Patterns of Teacher Response to Student Writing in a Multiple-Draft Composition Classroom: Is Content Feedback Followed by Form Feedback the Best Method? Journal of Second Language Writing, 9, 227-258.

Bee, R. & Bee, F. (1998). Constructive Feedback. Institute of Personnel and Development in the Training Extras.

Bitchener, J. (2008). Evidence in support of written corrective feedback. Journal of Second Language Writing, 17(2), 102-118.

Bitchener, J., & Knoch, U. (2008). The value of a focused approach to written corrective feedback. ELT Journal, 63(3), 204-211.

Black, R. (1993). A match of Learning Style to Teaching Style Based on Use of Hemispheric Dominance Theory to Enhance Learning of Creative Thinking Skills. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertations, University of Georgia.

Black, P. and Wiliam, D. (1998) Assessment and classroom learning. Assessment in Education 5(1), 7-74.

Campillo, P. S. (2003). An Analysis of Implicit and Explicit Feedback on Grammatical Accuracy. Journal of English and American Studies, 27, 209-228.

Carpenter, H., K. S. Jeon, D. MacGregor and A. Mackey (2006). Learners' Interpretations of Recasts. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 28(2), 209-236.

Chandler, J. (2003). The efficacy of various kinds of error feedback for improvement in the accuracy and fluency of L2student writing. Journal ofSecond Language Writing, 12(3), 267-296.

Colvin, G., Flannery, K. B., Sugai, G., & Monegan, J. (2009). Using Observational Data to Provide Performance Feedback to Teachers: A High School Case Study. Preventing School Failure, 53(2), 95-104.

Conti, G. J. (2004). Identifying Your Teaching Style. In Galbraith, Michael W. (ed) (pp.76-91). Malabar, FL: Krieger Publishing Company.

Daar, C., Fisher, J. (2004). Self-regulated Learning in the Mathematics Class. New Zealand Association for Research in Education (NZARE) conference, Palmerston North, 24-26 November (2004).

Doughty, C., & Varela, E. (1998). Communicative focus on form. In C. Doughty & J. William (Eds. ), Focus on form in classroom second language acquisition (pp.114-138). New York: Cambridge University Press.

Ellis, R. (2009). A Typology of Written Corrective Feedback Types. English Language Teaching Journal, 63, 97-107.

Ellis, R., & Sheen, Y. (2006). Re-examining the Role of Recasts in SLA. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 28, 575-600.

Ellis, R., Loewen, S., & Erlam, R. (2005). Implicit and Explicit Corrective Feedback and the Acquisition of L2 Grammar. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 28, 339-368.

Erel, S. & Bulut, D. (2007). Error Treatment in L2 Writing: A Comparative Study of Direct and Indirect Coded Feedback inTurkish EFL Context. Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi Sayı, 22(1), 397-415.

Eş, Ş. (2003). Applying Focus on Form in EFL classes: Focus on Form through Input Flood, Output, and Corrective Feedback. Unpublished M.A. Thesis, Anadolu University, Institute of Educational Sciences.

Farrar, Michael J. (1992). Negative Evidence and Grammatical Morpheme Acquisition. Developmental Psychology, 28(1), 90-98.

Felder, R.M., and L.K. Silverman. (1988). Learning and Teaching Styles in Engineering Education..

Ferris, D. R., & Roberts, B. (2001). Error feedback in L2 writing classes: How explicit does it need to be?. Journal of Second Language Writing, 10(3), 161-184.

Ferris, D. R. (2002). Treatment of Error in Second Language Writing Classes. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.

Guenette, D. (2007). Is feedback pedagogically correct? Research design issues in studies of feedback on writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 16(1), 40-53.

Hattie, J. and Timperley.H. (2007). The Power of Feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77, 81-112.

Hendrickson, J. (1978). Error Correction in Foreign Language Teaching: Recent Theory, Research, and Practice. Modern Language Journal, 62, 387-398.

Hoban, G.F. (2004). Seeking Quality in Teacher Education Design: A Four-Dimensional Approach. Australian Journal of Education, 48(2), 117-133.

Irons, A. (2008). Enhancing Learning through Formative Assessment and Feedback. London: Routledge.

Kaweera, C., & Usaha, S. (2008). The Impact of Different Types of Teacher Written Feedback on EFL University Students' Writing. KKU Res J (GS), 8(2), 83-94.

Kim, H., & Mathes, G. (2001). Explicit vs. Implicit Corrective Feedback. The Korea TESOL Journal, 4, 1-15.

Lalande, J.F., II (1982). Reducing Composition Errors: An Experiment. Modern Language Journal, 66, 140-149.

Lee, I. (1997). ESLLearners' Performance in Error Correction in Writing: Some Implications for Teaching. System, 25, 465-477.

Leki, I. (1991). The Preferences of ESL Students for Error Correction in College-Level Writing Classes. Foreign Language Annals, 24, 203-218.

Leowen, S., & Erlam, R. (2006, February). Corrective Feedback in the Chatroom: An Experimental Study. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 19(1), 1-14.

Liang, Y. (2008). The effects of error feedback in second language writing. Second Language Acquisition and Teaching, 15, 65-79.

Lightbown, P. M. & Spada, N. (1990). Focus on form and corrective feedback in communicative language teaching: Effects on second language learning. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 12(4), 429-448.

Lyster, R., & Ranta, L. (1997). Corrective feedback and learner uptake: Negotiation form in communicative classrooms. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 19, 37-66.

Lyster, R. (1998). Recasts, repetition, and ambiguity in L2 classroom discourse. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 20, 51-81.

Mackey, A. (2006). Feedback, noticing and instructed second language learning. Applied Linguistics, 27(3), 405-430.

Maree, J.G., & Fraser, W.J. (Eds). (2008). Outcomes-based assessment - facilitating best practice in classrooms. Heinemann: Cape Town.

Nabel, T. and M. Swain 2002. Learner awareness of recasts in classroom interaction: A case study of an adult EFL student's second language learning. Language Awareness 11(1), 43-63.

Oxford, R., M. Ehrman, and R. Lavine. (1991). Style Wars: Teacher-Student Style Conflicts in the Language Classroom, in S. Magnan, ed.

Panova, I., & Lyster, R. (2002). Patterns of Corrective Feedback and Uptake in an Adult ESL Classroom. TESOL Quarterly, 36(4), 573-595.

Pellettieri, J. (2000).

Rezaei, S., Mozaffari, F., & Hatef, A. (2011, March). Corrective Feedback in SLA: Classroom Practice and Future Directions. International Journal of English Linguistics, 1(1), 21-29.

Richards, J., & Rodgers, T. (2001). Approaches and methods in language teaching. New York: Cambridge University Press. <http: /dx. doi. org/10. 1017/CBO9780511667305>.

Schmidt, R. (2001). Attention. In P.J. Robinson (Ed. ), Cognition and Second Language Instruction (pp.3-32). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

Schmidt, R. (1990). The Role of Consciousness in Second Language Learning. Applied Linguistics, 11(2), 129-158.

Sheen, Y. (2007). The effect of focused written corrective feedback and language aptitude on ESL learners' acquisition of articles. TESOL Quarterly, 41(2), 255-283.

Sheen,Y., Wright,D. &Moldawa,A. (2009). Differential Effects of Focused and Unfocused Written Correction on the Accurate of Grammatical Forms by Adult ESL Learners. System, 37(4), 556-569.

Smith, M.C. (2005). The New Teacher Education: For Better or for Worse? Educational Researcher, 34(6), 181-206.

Spada, N. and P.M. Lightbown. (1993). Instruction and the Development of Questions In L2 Classrooms., Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 15, pp.205-224.

Stiggins, R.J. (2008) Assessment Manifesto: A Call for the Development of Balance Assessment Systems. A position paper published by the ETS Assessment Training Institute, Portland, Oregon.

Truscott, J. (1996). The Case against Grammar Correction in L2 Writing Classes. Language Learning, 46, 327-369.

Tudini, V. (2003). Virtual immersion: native speaker chats as a bridge to oral interaction. Manuscript submitted for publication.

White, L., Spada, N., Lightbown, P. M., & Ranta, L. (1991). Input Enhancement and L2 Question Formation. Applied Linguistics, 12, 416-432.

Widdowson, H. G. (2003). Defining Issues in English Language Teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Zhang S. (1995). Reexamining the affective advantage of peer feedback in the ESL writing class. Journal of Second Language Writing, 4(3), 209-222. ( Received 11 September 2014; accepted 18 September 2014 ).

Show More Hide
Cited By:

[1] M. Zeinolabedini, J. Gholami, "Colleagues helping each other to publish in medical sciences: Iranian field specialists' convenience editing strategies", Learned Publishing, Vol. 29, p. 249, 2016


[2] J. Gholami, M. Zeinolabedini, "Peer-to-peer prescriptions in medical sciences: Iranian field specialists' attitudes toward convenience editing", English for Specific Purposes, Vol. 45, p. 86, 2017