This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
Abell S. K., Lederman N. G. (Eds. ), Handbook of research on science education. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, (2007).
Ash D., Klein C., Inquiry in the informal learning environment. In J. Minstrell & E. H. van Zee (Eds. ), Inquiring into Inquiry Learning in Science, 2000, pp.216-240, Washington, D. C: American Association for the Advancement of Science.
Bailey S., Watson R., International Journal of Science Education 20(2) (1998) 139-152.
Barraza L., Environmental Education Research 5(1) (1999) 49-66.
Barrett M. J., Participatory pedagogy in environmental education: Reproduction or disruption? In A. Reid, B. B. Jensen, J. Nikel, V. Simovsla (Eds. ), Participation and learning: Perspective on education and the environment, health and, New York: Springer, 2008, pp.212-224.
Bartholomew H., Osborne J., Ratcliffe M., Science Education 88(5) (2004) 655-682.
Baskaran A., Boden R., Globalization and the commodification of science. In M. Muchie, & X. Li (Eds. ), Globalization, inequality and the commodification of life and well-being, London: Adonis & Abbey, 2006, pp.42-72.
Bell B., Gilbert J., Teacher development: A model from science education. London: Falmer Press, (1996).
Bencze J. L., Alsop S., Bowen G. M., Journal of Activist Science and Technology Education 1(2) (2009) 78-112.
Berland L. K., McNeill K. J., Science Education 94(5) (2010) 765-793.
Berry L., Loughran J., van Driel J. H., International Journal of Science Education 30(10) (2008) 1271-1279.
Birdsall S., Australian Journal of Environmental Education 26 (2010) 65-84.
Braund M., Reiss M. (Eds. ), Learning science outside the classroom, London: RoutledgeFalmer, (2004).
Carter L., Journal of Activist Science & Technology Education 1(1) (2009) 57-60.
Cheek D. W., Think constructively about science, technology, ands society education. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press, (1992).
Cobern W., Science & Education 4(3) (1995) 287-302.
Glod M., U.S. Teens Trail Peers Around World on Math-Science Test. The Washington Post, Wednesday, December 5, 2007. Retrieved from http: /www. washingtonpost. com/wp- dyn/content/article/2007/12/04/AR2007120400730. html.
Gundle-Krieg D., US students rank 11th in Science, 9th in Math: should we go back to basics? Education Examiner, February 25, 2009. Retrieved from http: /www. examiner. com/education-in-national/us-students-rank-11th-science-9thmath-should-we-go-back-to-basics.
Hodson D., Looking to the Future: Building a Curriculum for Social Activism, Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Sense Publishers, (2011).
Hodson D., International Journal of Science Education 25(6) (2003) 645-670.
Paulson A., New report ranks U.S. teens 29th in science worldwide: Why this information could be a useful tool in improving science education. The Christian Science Monitor, December 5, 2007. Retrieved from http: /www. csmonitor. com/2007/1205/p02s01-usgn. html.
Ratcliffe M., Pedagogical content knowledge for teaching concepts of the nature of science, 2011. Retrieved from www. mennta. hi. is/malthing_radstefnur/symposium9/.. /nfsun9_submission_5. doc.
Thomas G., Durant J., Why should we promote the public understanding of science? In M. Shortland (Ed. ), Scientific literacy papers, 1987, pp.1-14.
[1] D. Song, A. Karimi, P. Kim, "A Remotely Operated Science Experiment framework for under-resourced schools", Interactive Learning Environments, Vol. 24, p. 1706, 2016
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2015.1041407[2] C. Guo, M. Chiu, Science Education Research and Practice in Asia, p. 175, 2016
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-0847-4_10[3] N. Edwards, L. Le Grange, "The use of inquiry-based science teaching to promote students’ conceptual understanding of direct current electricity", Suid-Afrikaanse Tydskrif vir Natuurwetenskap en Tegnologie, Vol. 36, 2017
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4102/satnt.v36i1.1427[4] L. Xu, B. Huang, G. Wu, "Mapping science communication scholarship in China: Content analysis on breadth, depth and agenda of published research", Public Understanding of Science, Vol. 24, p. 897, 2015
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662515600966[5] P. Zervas, D. Sampson, Authentic Learning Through Advances in Technologies, p. 91, 2018
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-5930-8_7[6] E. Čipková, Š. Karolčík, K. Sládková, K. Ušáková, "What is the level of scientific literacy among geography students studying bachelor's studies in natural sciences?", International Research in Geographical and Environmental Education, p. 1, 2017
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10382046.2017.1389044[7] A. Patterson, D. Roman, M. Friend, J. Osborne, B. Donovan, "Reading for meaning: The foundational knowledge every teacher of science should have", International Journal of Science Education, Vol. 40, p. 291, 2018
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2017.1416205[8] D. Geelan, The Palgrave Handbook of Global Citizenship and Education, p. 507, 2018
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-59733-5_32[9] E. Hebets, M. Welch-Lazoritz, P. Tisdale, T. Wonch Hill, "Eight-Legged Encounters—Arachnids, Volunteers, and Art help to Bridge the Gap between Informal and Formal Science Learning", Insects, Vol. 9, p. 27, 2018
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/insects9010027[10] M. Ryu, M. Tuvilla, C. Wright, "Resettled Burmese Refugee Youths’ Identity Work in an Afterschool STEM Learning Setting", Journal of Research in Childhood Education, Vol. 33, p. 84, 2019
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02568543.2018.1531454[11] E. Čipková, Š. Karolčík, L. Scholzová, "Are secondary school graduates prepared for the studies of natural sciences? – evaluation and analysis of the result of scientific literacy levels achieved by secondary school graduates", Research in Science & Technological Education, p. 1, 2019
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02635143.2019.1599846[12] H. Kate, J. James, C. Tidmarsh, "Using Wicked problems to foster interdisciplinary practice among UK trainee teachers", Journal of Education for Teaching, p. 1, 2019
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02607476.2019.1639263[13] H. Fadzil, R. Saat, "Exploring Students’ Acquisition of Manipulative Skills during Science Practical Work", EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, Vol. 13, 2017
DOI: https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2017.00953a[14] P. Maharg, "Máscaras mortuorias y máscaras profesionales: comunidad, valores y ética en la educación jurídica.", REDU. Revista de Docencia Universitaria, Vol. 12, p. 127, 2014
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4995/redu.2014.5494[15] S. Rehorek, M. Shotwell, "How to Use Taxonomic Principles in a Non-Scientific Setting to Teach Hierarchical Thinking", The American Biology Teacher, Vol. 80, p. 446, 2018
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1525/abt.2018.80.6.446[16] E. BULDU, R. OLGAN, "Erken Çocukluk Eğitimi Yapısal Kalite Göstergeleri ve PISA Fen Okur-yazarlık Becerileri Arasındaki İlişki: Ülkeler-Arası Karşılaştırma", Necatibey Eğitim Fakültesi Elektronik Fen ve Matematik Eğitimi Dergisi, p. 186, 2020
DOI: https://doi.org/10.17522/balikesirnef.618977