Subscribe to our Newsletter and get informed about new publication regulary and special discounts for subscribers!

ILSHS > Volume 37 > Coriolanus: Celebrating a Bakhtinian Anarchic Body...
< Back to Volume

Coriolanus: Celebrating a Bakhtinian Anarchic Body of Roman Republic

Full Text PDF


The last tragedy of Shakespeare, Coriolanus (1608), is one of the most ignored and controversial Shakespearian plays towards which there has always been a sort of dislike. Despite the fact that the dislike is attributed by many critics to the play's harshness, it can be analyzed in terms of the play's protagonist and the low language he uses. Cursing language is the most important feature of Coriolanus which undermines him into a grotesque figure, removes the audience's and the reader's sympathy with him, and questions the authoritative language of the play. This study uses Mikhail Bakhtin's ideas to bring under scrutiny Shakespeare's unpopular protagonist in terms of his cursing and obscene language or voice. Using such ideas as "heteroglossia," "grotesque body" and "carnival" it will be argued that Shakespeare through language makes the audiences sympathize neither with patricians nor plebeians, but gets them to stand and criticize a contemporary issue. This so-called "alienation effect" created by Shakespeare changes the play into an epic theatre. Also, it is shown that "heteroglossia" and the grotesque quality of Coriolanus' language help to undermine the authoritative or "unitary language" of the play as a systematic whole. In other words, the stable society and language Shakespeare is after are subverted by the heteroglot and grotesque language of Coriolanus and Menenius.


International Letters of Social and Humanistic Sciences (Volume 37)
R. D. Beigi and P. Abbasi, "Coriolanus: Celebrating a Bakhtinian Anarchic Body of Roman Republic", International Letters of Social and Humanistic Sciences, Vol. 37, pp. 5-17, 2014
Online since:
August 2014

Bakhtin, M. M. 1981. The Dialogic Imagination. Ed. Michael Holquist. Translated by Caryl Emerson and Michael Holquist. Austin: Texas University Press.

Bakhtin, M. M. 1984. Rabelais and His World. Translated by Helene Iswolsky. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

Bakhtin, M. M. 1986. Speech Genres and Other Late Essays. Translated by Vern W. McGee. Edited by Caryl Emerson and Michael Holquist. Austin: Texas University Press.

Benjamin, Walter. 1998. Understanding Brecht. Translated by Anna Bostock. London: Verso.

Booker, M. Keith. 1996. A Practical Introduction to Literary Theory and Criticism. Arkansas: Longman.

Brown, John Russel. 2001. Coriolanus: Power and Uncertainty,. In Shakespeare: The Tragedies. Houndmills and New York: Palgrave, 342-363.

Clemen, W. H. 1951. The Development of Shakespeare's Imagery. New York: A Drama book.

Dentith, Simon. 2005. Bakhtinian Thought: An Introductory Reader. London and New York: Taylor & Francis e-library.

Eagleton, Terry. 1986. William Shakespeare. Oxford: Blackwell.

Eliot, T. S. 1932. Hamlet,. In Selected Essays. London: Faber and Faber Limited, 141-146.

Farnham, Willard. 1965. Coriolanus". In Discussions of Shakespeare, s Roman Plays. Edited by Maurice Charney. Boston: D. C. Heath and Company, 135-155.

Habib, M. A. R. 2005. A History of Literary Criticism: From Plato to the Present. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing Ltd.

Hatlen, Burton. 1997. The 'Noble Thing' and the 'Boy of Tears': Coriolanus and the Embarrassment of Identity,. English Literary Renaissance. 27(3): 393-420.

Holquist, Michael. 1977. Dostoevsky and the Novel. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

Hunt, Maurice. 2004. The Backward Voice of Coriol-anus,. Shakespeare Studies. ProQuest Research Library, 220-239. http: /www. proQuest. umi. com.

Jorgensen, Paul A. 1965. The Soldier in Society: From Casque to Cushion". In Discussions of Shakespeare, s Roman Plays. Edited by Maurice Charney. Boston: D. C. Heath and Company, 121-130.

Kott, Jan. 1967. Coriolanus or Shakespearian Contradictions,. In Shakespeare Our Contemporary. London: Methuen and Co Ltd, 141-167.

Langis, Unhae. 2010. Coriolanus: Inordinate Passions and Powers in Personal and Political Goverance,. Comparative Drama. 44(1): ProQuest Research Library, 1-27.

Meyerhold, Vsevolod. 1969. The Fairground Booth,. In Meyerhold on Theatre. Translated by Edward Braun. London: Eyre Methuen.

Parker, R. B, ed. 1998. The Tragedy of Coriolanus. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Shakespeare, William. 1998. Coriolanus: The Oxford Shakespeare. Edited by R. B. Parker. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Shakespeare, William. 2009. The Tempest: The Cambridge Dover Wilson Shakespeare. Edited by John Dover Wilson. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Sicherman, Carol. 1972. Coriolanus: The Failure of Words,. The John Hopkins University Press. 39(2): 189-207.

Stallybrass, Peter and Allen White. 1986. The Politics and Poetics of Transgression. Ithaca, N. Y.: Cornel University Press.

Van Dijk, Maarten. 2001. Lice in Fur: the aesthetics of cheek and Shakespearean production strategy,. In Shakespeare and Modern Theatre. Edited by Michael Bristol & Kathleen McLuskie. London: Routledge, 160-180.

Vickers, Brian, ed. 1976. Shakespeare: Coriolanus,. Studies in English Literature. London: 1(58): 1-63. ( Received 30 July 2014; accepted 08 August 2014 ).

Show More Hide
Cited By:
This article has no citations.