Odile Riondet in communication horizon

The study radiographies the scientific contribution of Professor Odile Riondet in communication domain. It is ascertained that the standard R. T. Craig, of the "seven major traditions" of "communication field theory", is inapplicable. The method that is used is the axis of segregation of problems after expressed ideational. It emerges that Odile Riondet as advocate of SIC (Sciences de l'information et communication), is positioned by default in "communication science". It results that she has meritorious contributions to communication epistemology, in communication ethics, communication philosophy and communication anthropology. It is concluded that in the communication horizon, Odile Riondet can be remembered as outstanding specialist of the "communication anthropology" axis.


A RADIOGRAPHY OF THE PRESENCE IN COMMUNICATION HORIZON
It would be difficult to frame Professor Odile Riondet contribution in one or more of the traditions Craig standard. Attached of the axes standard we will emphasize in relation to this, communicational positioning and Odile Riondet scientific contribution in the communication field.
Basically, investigative spirit is placed in "le champ general de SIC" (Riondet O., 2011a). In the English language, on the communication space there is a large and discrete rupture. It is generated by the location of the two "membranes" of communication, two great intellectual armies: "communication science" (C. R. Berger, M. E. Roloff, D.R. Roskos-Ewoldsen J. O. Greene, B. R. Burleson, J. K. Burgoon etc.) and "communication theory" (S. W. Littlejohn, K. A. Foss, R. T. Craig and others). For Odile Riondet this major onto-epistemological issue is solved: as part of the SCI, communication is in the center of a science.
In the O. Riondet's conception, science is "définit par son objet, ses méthodes, ses concepts, son regard, son éthique, sa finalité, mais aussi par la confrontation de tous ces éléments dans une communauté qui a son histoire" (Riondet O., 2007b). Projecting the definition elements on the range axes, results some interesting elements. Generally, ontology is the object domain ("objet", "concepts" in Riondet's definition), is the domain of conceptual organized knowledge; it is the picture of existences. Epistemology looks the knowing subject in relation to the known object, with the possibility, efficiency and limits of knowledge. Methodology is the set of methods of scientific cogitative system ("méthodes" as marks O. Riondet). If we think about any looking is by default value, we can retain the "regard" from the definition as a statement of axiology (value and evaluation). The definition radiography and "éthique": this is part of communication ethics axis. The phrase "sa finalité" leads us to the practical aspect of communication: communication praxeology axis.
We interpret "communauté" as the scientific community of communication: court that authenticates, legitimates and accredits. Alongside the issue (thematic, ideational, solving methods), the community sets the coordinates system of the current paradigm of communication: Variable Geometry-Constructive-Transactional Paradigm, P3.
There is a science of communication and "sciences de l'information", says Riondet (Riondet O., 2007a).
Odile Riondet's obvious propensity is, between the hard axis, to the communication epistemology, and, of the soft axes, to the communication anthropology ("anthropologie de la communication"). O. Riondet finds the existence of three "dimensions épistémologiques": "Nous distinguerons ici trois dimensions: celle des configurations épistémologiques (les différentes articulations de méthode, concepts, auteurs, champs d'applications caractéristiques d'une discipline), les représentations de la science des chercheurs (du positivisme le plus strict à toutes les formes d'herméneutique) et les anthropologies ou représentations de l'homme sousjacentes, qui jouent souvent le rôle de présupposé ou d'hypothèse" (Riondet O., 2011d). As seen, at O. Riondet we deal with an extended epistemology presiding also in areas of ontology, methodology, hermeneutics, and anthropology. From the perspective of the movement in the "communication et religion" field (Riondet O., 2011d), the solution is correct, because religion does not allow a clear segregation between the ontological-epistemological-axiologicalhermeneutic anthropology: creator of the world set picture of existence, the limits of knowledge, values, interpretation and rites, and no one can change them. In connection, it
Hermeneutics opening is confirmed by thorough study "Interpretation, comprehension et construction scientifique de la connaissance" (Riondet O., 2010a). Her hermeneutic approach is based on W. Dilthey (explanation-understanding ratio), N. Whitehead (perceptioninterpretation relationship), P. Ricoeur (the idea of recognition) and U. Eco (limits of interpretation).
Although she has meritorious contributions on several axes of the communication standard, Odile Riondet is, above all, a remarkable anthropologist of communication, of culture (Beciu, Camelia, Drăgan, Ioan, Popescu, Dana, Riondet, Odile, 2009a). Citable for their major relevance and originality are on this line three ideas. First is memorable "hypothèse anthropologique" that issue: "un être humain travaille sur lui-même, c'est bénéfique, les relations aux autres ne menacent en rien la découverte de lui-même, mais y aident" (Riondet O., 2011c). The second idea consists of clarification of three meanings of "anthropology de la communication" ["faits de la communication", "utiliser des notions d'anthropologie (le mythe, le rite)" and "les images de l'homme "] (lecture at the University of Craiova, April 10, 2012). The third idea consists in revealing philosophical anchoring of communication anthropology: "cette discipline a aussi un soubassement philosophique" (lecture at the University of Craiova, April 10, 2012).

CONCLUSION
The radiography of presence of Odile Riondet in communication horizon indicates a specialist in communication domain with a solid philosophical basis (aside great philosophers such as Im. Kant, P. Ricoeur, E. Levinas, M. Foucault, we find quoted Constantin Noica and Lucian Blaga), with an extensive communicational culture and a thinking capable of exquisite and original inferences.
As it turned out, has revealing achievements in many segments of communication science. We find that, first of all, Odile Riondet can be retained as a specialist in communication anthropology