Communication Law-a soft axis of Communication discipline

The study is circumscribed to Communication Science Fundamentals specialty. It aims to highlight the place of Communication Law in the communication system as an academic discipline. For this is taken as reference system The Theory and Standard of Communication Axis previously developed by Ştefan Vlăduţescu (2013): communication universe is organized, at the moment, compared to 15 fields of communication; these differ by the central axis, the type and consistency of structure and the cords that generate the movement, the internal development in field. The Communication Law is the field of knowledge organized around the law axis. This is a soft axis of Communication discipline.


INTRODUCTION
Thomas Kuhn is the one who introduced in the ontology of the science the paradigm concept. He shows that this concept is to use "in two different senses": "on the one hand, it stands for the entire constellation of beliefs, values, techniques, and so on shared by the members of the given community. On the other, it denotes one sort of element in that constellation, the concrete puzzle-solutions employed as models or examples, can replace explicit rules as a basis for the solution of remaining puzzles of normal science" (Kuhn, 1998 p 175). We extract from here the irradiating significant concepts: "paradigm" and "community". "Community" is the scientific community, that the wide assembly of those dealing with science or a science: "a scientific community consists (...) of the practitioners of a scientific specialty"; communities can even be structured as "schools in the science" (Kuhn, 1998, p. 177). So, the paradigm, as postulated T. Kuhn has two coordinates of scientific catagraph. But we see it as a whole in which the senses are melted and for which the theoretical scission does not mean inconsistency. Our interpretation makes from paradigm a synthesis of the features of a rigorous science and robust, that is strong and well anchored in the scientific environment. A rigorous and robust science/theory is a strong science/theory.
In paradigm we find the most of the major components of a "strong science". The paradigm is the constellation of certain shared options for maintaining or reforming of a science. In constellation we have to decipher the springs of revolutionary replacement of some of the "normal science". To revolutionize the science, it starts from the "normal science". The C T E D "communication as a field " is a conceptual membrane that turned into "communication as an universe" Membrane, "communication as a multi-field". Also, we underline that "The communication is multi-space structure and multi-universe" (Vlăduţescu, 2013).
Appearance almost consolidated is that in communication domain there is not an ontology, an epistemology, a methodology, an axiology. The reality is that, in various stages of development, all of them exist. Hard work of researchers made to base some components or "branches" of the communication discipline. Raul Fuentes Navarro talks about four dimensions of communication: "gnoseological, teleological, praxeological (...) ethics" (Navarro, 1999, p. 64).
On the development of a communication disciplines, Robert L. Heath and Jennings Bryant highlight: "An academic discipline grows because of what its scholars share. To this end, scholars need to understand the discipline history, have a common sense of the object of inquiry, focus on similar and compatible questions, agree on the best methodologies, and create a common terminology, or lexicon, with which to discuss the discipline " (Heath & Bryant, 2000, p. 89). As we see the issue of ontology ("common terminology or lexicon") is placed last, even it is decisive. There are evoked, epistemology ("object of inquiry", "questions"), methodology ("methodologies") and history ("discipline's history").
Stephen W. Littlejohn and Karen A. Foss think epistemology, ontology and axiology as "philosophical assumptions" that "every theory, explicitly or implicitly, includes" and refers to the "nature of knowledge and how it is obtained, what constitutes existence, and what is valuable" (Littlejohn & Foss, 2008, p. 16). The two reputed experts enumerate such epistemology, ontology and axiology and treat them in this arrangement. On the other hand, they conceive the three elements as "the branch of philosophy." That is, they see them as foreign branches. We conceive them as internal axis. In addition, we talk not only about 3 axis, but 15.
For a discipline to be imposed and to develop are required at least one well-defined ontology and a realistic epistemology, and besides them a methodology and axiology, how retarded they are. The accreditation process is conditioned by their sharing of a broad community of scholars, researchers, theorists, scientists. Ontology, epistemology, methodology and axiology are primordial. We can say that these four are hard axes of not only a space, is not only a multi-faced object. We sustain that communication is much more. Communication is multi-space and multi-structure universe. We see communication as a systemic universe with 15 intersected fields by different consistency and various levels of cohesion. Communication is an irregular and heterogeneous universe: multi-space and multistructure. Each field is crystallized around an axis and appears as an area with a certain systemic location, a specific orientation, with a certain internal coherence of the structure. In the center of the field is axis. The field strength is the force axis. No axis is of the field, but the field is of the axis.
Our opinion is that the 15 components, branches should be considered axes of communication, trails, tracks of theoretical constructive-cognitive-cogitative crystallization and practical-applicable of communication. Axes are also, pillars and specialties of the discipline of communication.
Our reasoning is as follows. Philosophy until Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz and Immanuel Kant was an integrative discipline of science, generally of knowledge, because the great philosophers were also great scientists. Once with the most important philosopher of the nineteenth century, Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel, Philosophy is isolated of science and is Volume 36 installed as autonomous discourse which no longer incorporates science, but explains it. The integrative philosophy and explanatory philosophy were presented as coherent cogitative system: ontology, gnoseology, axiology, logic, ethics, aesthetics, etc.. Once arrived at Martin Heidegger and Ludwig Wittgenstein, philosophy enters the implosion. The system idea collapses completely. Philosophy is developed as interrogation, as reflection on the major themes of existential condition proximity and social of mundane human; focuses strongly on language issues. So it is that the system decays: some of its elements are self-sustaining, while others remain as "dead branches" of philosophy. Our idea is that "dead branches" can be green. They must be revived. Be reformed and transformed into useful tools in theory and practice. From components of philosophy, ontology, epistemology, methodology, axiology, praxeology etc., become components of theories and sciences. It is a process of grafting. Dead branches are grafted, they are grafted on the alive trunk and strong of the science. Meditation-philosophy lives his destiny of philosophy, but, alternatively, as a fractal, is also becoming an internal branch of science, of scientific cogitative system or of the cogitative theoretical system. Having lost branches, the philosophical trunk forms with them a useful set of branches able to be restored to a new life. New sciences, new cogitative systems absorb as own components the branches of philosophy and absorb generic as branch the reflective method of the philosophy. Since taking over the branches of a separate construct that tends to keep them, the new cogitative system integrates them as axes. We conceive axis as internalized polarizing branch of specific knowledge.
On this preliminary argument we base the cognitive cogitative constructive approach. This is guided by ordering axes thesis: communication sets 15  Diagrammatic representation of the idea that lies behind the ordering axes thesis appears as a sphere in which they meet each 15 vectors bidirectionally. Axes have one end which, as vectors, meet each other in the core of extended spherical, permeable and flexible of communication. While at one end vector comes to nuclear meeting, the other end extending in a direction of non-meeting the communication space. Communication appears thus as multispace. Since the structure has on each space created around and along each axis and a different consistency, we can speak of a heterogeneous structure. The heterogeneous structures have intense structuring nodes and nodes of structural relaxation. Consequently, the axes will reveal in the global structure of communication regional structures with recognizable profile. After creating a multi-space of communication, our axial perspective enables also highlighting of multi-structure.
The Communication Laws Axis -A15 polarizes and unifies the research regarding social relations with respect to communication, regarding their completion and licensing. "The law, in general, shows Maria Năstase Georgescu (Georgescu, 2004), is a set of rules of conduct and principles sanctioned and guaranteed regulating social relations essential to society at a time to ensure social order and determination freedoms and rights in society". Among the experts in