Subscribe

Subscribe to our Newsletter and get informed about new publication regulary and special discounts for subscribers!

ILSHS > Volume 29 > Communication Concepts vs. Sciences Concepts
< Back to Volume

Communication Concepts vs. Sciences Concepts

Full Text PDF

Abstract:

The scientists as Bateson, Watzlawick expresses the determining role of interaction in the axiom of the “impossibility of not communicating”. All behavior (verbal and nonverbal) occurring between persons who are conscious of each other's presence has behavioural effects, whether intended or not. Such effects have interpersonal message value, and thus are communicative in nature. Since it is impossible for humans not to behave in one way or another, it follows that in interaction it is impossible not to communicate (Bateson, 1963; Watzlawick et al., 1967). Communication theory is relatively new as science and interacts with the other disciplines of sciences. During its development some of the notions were used that were already committed and comprehensive. This article aims to present some of them. Terms as system, input, output, feedback, entropy specific to scientific disciplines as systems theory, cybernetics, information theory, physics, are especially used in communication theory.

Info:

Periodical:
International Letters of Social and Humanistic Sciences (Volume 29)
Pages:
48-57
Citation:
D. Gîfu and M. Teodorescu, "Communication Concepts vs. Sciences Concepts", International Letters of Social and Humanistic Sciences, Vol. 29, pp. 48-57, 2014
Online since:
Jun 2014
Export:
Distribution:
References:

[1] Julian B. Barbour, Herbert Pfister (1995). Mach's principle: from Newton's bucket to quantum gravity. Birkhäuser.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-3327-4_27

[2] Andrzej Borowski, International Letters of Social and Humanistic Sciences 14 (2014) 7-17.

[3] Ştefan Vlăduţescu, European Scientific Journal 9(32) (2013).

[4] Jason L. Powell, International Letters of Social and Humanistic Sciences 7 (2014) 22-30.

[5] C. Belea (1983). Teoria Sistemelor. Bucureşti: Editura Tehnica.

[6] Roger Balian (2004). Entropy, a Protean concept. In Jean Dalibard, Poincaré Seminar 2003: Bose-Einstein condensation - entropy. Basel: Birkhäuser.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-0348-7932-3_7

[7] Andrzej Borowski, International Letters of Social and Humanistic Sciences 11 (2014) 1-168.

[8] Ş. Vlăduţescu, E. M. Ciupercă (2013). Next Flood Level of Communication: Social Networks. Aachen: Shaker Verlag.

[9] Daniel R. Brooks, E. O. Wiley (1988). Evolution as Entropy – Towards a Unified Theory of Biology. University of Chicago Press.

[10] Andrzej Borowski, International Letters of Social and Humanistic Sciences 3 (2013) 69-74.

[11] Ștefan Vlăduțescu, International Letters of Social and Humanistic Sciences 15 (2014) 164-170.

[12] Sergiu Calin, Constantin Belea (1973). Sisteme automate complexe. Editura Tehnica.

[13] Robert T. Craig (1999). Communication Theory as a Field. International Communication Association. Retrieved.

[14] John Craig (1849). A new universal etymological, technological and pronouncing dictionary of the English language: embracing all terms used in art, science, and literature. Volume 1. Harvard University.

[15] M. Siminică, A. Traistaru, International Journal of Education and Research 1(12) (2013).

[16] Ştefan Vlăduţescu (2013). What Kind of Communication Is Philosophy. Jokull.

[17] Ingrid V. Eriksson (2008). Science education in the 21st century. Nova Books.

[21] R. Frigg, C. Werndl (2010). Entropy – A Guide for the Perplexed. Oxford University Press, Oxford.

[22] Thomas Goetz, Wired Magazine (Wired Magazine). Retrieved (2011).

[23] Andrzej Borowski, International Letters of Social and Humanistic Sciences 4 (2013) 70-74.

[24] Ștefan Vlăduțescu (2013). Principle of the Irrepressible Emergence of the Message. Jokull.

[25] B. M. Dascălu (2014). Echivocul imagologic în Caietele lui Emil Cioran. Studii de Ştiinţă şi Cultură.

[26] Russelkl C. Hibbeler (2009), Equations of Motion: Normal and tangential coordinates. Engineering Mechanics: Dynamics (12 ed. ). Prentice Hall.

[27] Ioan Constantin Dima, Ştefan Vlăduţescu (2012). Persuasion elements used in logistical negotiation: Persuasive logistical negotiation. Saarbrucken: LAP Lambert Academic Publishing.

[28] David M. Herold, Martin M. Greller, Academy of management Journal 20(1) (1977).

[29] Andrzej Borowski, International Letters of Social and Humanistic Sciences 6 (2013) 86-90.

[30] Ştefan Vlăduţescu, International Letters of Social and Humanistic Sciences 10(2) (2014) 100-106.

[31] P. T. Landsberg, J. Stat. Physics 35(1984).

[32] M. Colhon (2013). Automatic Lexical Alignment between Syntactically Weak Related Languages. Application for English and Romanian. In Computational Collective Intelligence. Technologies and Applications (pp.266-275). Springer Berlin Heidelberg.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-40495-5_27

[33] Jie Liu, Golnaraghi Kubica Wang, Fuzzy Sets and Systems (2010).

[36] Isaac Newton, (2010). The principia : mathematical principles of natural philosophy. Snowball Pub.

[37] Andrzej Borowski, International Letters of Social and Humanistic Sciences 4 (2013) 70-74.

[38] Ştefan Vlăduţescu, International Journal of Education and Research 1(11) (2013).

[39] F. Hristea, M. Colhon (2012). Feeding syntactic versus semantic knowledge to a knowledge-lean unsupervised word sense disambiguation algorithm with an underlying Naïve Bayes model. Fundamenta Informaticae.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-33693-5_4

[40] Claude Elwood Shannon, The Bell System Technical Journal (1948).

[42] William K. Rawlins (1988). A Dialectical Analysis of the Tensions, Functions and Strategic Challenges of Communication in Young Adult Friendships. Communication Yearbook. Newbury, CA: Sage.

[44] Ştefan Vlăduţescu (2002). Informaţia de la teorie către ştiinţă. Bucureşti: Editura Didactică şi Pedagogică.

[45] Ştefan Vlăduţescu, American International Journal of Contemporary Research 3(10) (2013).

[46] M. Tribus, E. C. McIrvine, Scientific American 224 (1971).

[48] Paul Allen Tipler Gene Mosca (2003). Physics for scientists and engineers (5th ed. ). Macmillan.

[49] P. Germain, M. Piau, D. Caillerie, ed. (2012). Theoretical and Applied Mechanics. Elsevier.

[50] Johnnie T. Dennis (2003). The Complete Idiot's Guide to Physics. Alpha Books.

[51] Ştefan Vlăduţescu (2006). Comunicare jurnalistică negativă. Bucureşti: Editura Academiei.

[52] R. Stichweh, Acta Sociologica 43(1) (2000).

[53] Ludwig von Bertalanffy (1962). General Systems Theory: A Critical Review. London.

[54] Paul Watzlawick, Janet Helmick Beavin, Don J. Jackson (1967). Pragmatics of Human Communication. New York: Norton.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/3206369

[55] Ştefan Vlăduțescu, International Letters of Social and Humanistic Sciences 16 (2014) 86-95.

[56] Jason L. Powell, International Letters of Social and Humanistic Sciences 17(1) (2014) 1-60.

[57] Aurelia Traistaru, Marioara Avram, International Letters of Social and Humanistic Sciences 13 (2014) 79-88.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.18052/www.scipress.com/ilshs.24.79

[58] Ştefan Vlăduţescu (2010). Formule existenţiale şi adresări literare. Craiova: Editura Sitech.

[59] Jason L. Powell, International Letters of Social and Humanistic Sciences 16(2) (2014) 108-121.

[60] Jason L. Powell, International Letters of Social and Humanistic Sciences 16(2) (2014) 132-143.

[61] Jason L. Powell, International Letters of Social and Humanistic Sciences 16(2) (2014) 177-183.

[62] Goran Rajović, Jelisavka Bulatović, International Letters of Social and Humanistic Sciences 15(2) (2014) 125-137.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.18052/www.scipress.com/ilshs.26.125

[63] Ioan Constantin Dima, Janusz Grabara, Vladimir Modrak, International Letters of Social and Humanistic Sciences 15(2) (2014) 148-156.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.18052/www.scipress.com/ilshs.26.148

[64] Nirmal Kumar Betchoo, International Letters of Social and Humanistic Sciences 16(1) (2014) 39-48. ( Received 24 May 2014; accepted 30 May 2014 ).

Show More Hide