Subscribe

Subscribe to our Newsletter and get informed about new publication regulary and special discounts for subscribers!

ILSHS > Volume 27 > Leadership Styles and Employee Satisfaction: A...
< Back to Volume

Leadership Styles and Employee Satisfaction: A Correlation Study

Full Text PDF

Abstract:

The purpose of this quantitative correlation study was to determine the extent to which leadership style preferences correlate with employee satisfaction with supervision among employees and leaders of some companies. This study measured preferences for each of five common leadership styles and examined correlations with measures of employee satisfaction. The styles studied were transactional leadership, transformational leadership, autocratic leadership, charismatic leadership, and situational leadership. Results indicated that each of the five leadership styles has a positive correlation with employee satisfaction, suggesting that the situational leadership style may be the most appropriate style for leaders in some companies.

Info:

Periodical:
International Letters of Social and Humanistic Sciences (Volume 27)
Pages:
156-169
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18052/www.scipress.com/ILSHS.27.156
Citation:
S. Afshinpour "Leadership Styles and Employee Satisfaction: A Correlation Study", International Letters of Social and Humanistic Sciences, Vol. 27, pp. 156-169, 2014
Online since:
May 2014
Authors:
Saeid Afshinpour
Keywords:
Autocratic Leadership, Charismatic Leadership, Effectiveness, Quantitative Correlation, Situational Leadership, Transactional Leadership, Transformational Leadership
Export:
RIS, BibTeX, Text
Distribution:
Open Access

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License

References:

Glaser J. E., Business Book Review 23(29) (2012) 2-10.

Moore G. A. (2013). Dealing with Darwin: How great companies innovate at every phase of their evolution. New York: The Penguin Group.

Houghton J. D., Yoho S. K., Journal of Leadership and Organizational Studies 11(4) (2012) 65.

Hasgall A., Shoham S., Journal of Knowledge Management 12(1) (2008) 51.

Bass B. M. (1990). Handbook of leadership: Theory, research, and managerial applications (3rd ed. ). New York: The Free Press.

Kouzes J. M., Posner B. Z., Journal of Management Inquiry 14(4) (2013) 357-365.

Avolio B. J. (2007). Leadership development in balance: Made/born. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Northouse P. G. (2004). Leadership: Theory and practice (3rd ed. ). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Kerfoot K., Medsurg Nursing 17(2) (2013) 133-135.

Choi J., Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies 12(1) (2011) 24-43.

Farmer L. A., Journal of Nursing Management 13 (2012) 483-489.

Long S., Spurlock D. G., Engineering Management Journal 20(2) (2013) 30-37.

Kao P., Kao H., Journal of American Academy of Business, Cambridge 10(2) (2010) 71-80.

Yukl G. (2011). Leadership in organizations (6th ed. ). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall.

Creswell J. W. (2013). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.

Ross S. C., The Journal of Applied Business and Economics 8(1) (2008) 46-56.

Agezo C. K., Ife Psychologia 16(2) (2010) 260-279.

Ghosh D., Journal of Managerial Issues 20(1) (2008) 68-90.

Smith L. A., Bergey P., Cantwell A. R., Doran M., Research Technology Management 49(4) (2012) 15-23.

Katz R. (2011). The human side of managing technological innovation (2nd ed. ). New York: Oxford University.

Akehurst G., Comenche J. M., Galindo M., Small Business Economics 32(3) (2013) 277-290.

Gall M. D., Gall J. P., Borg W. R. (2010). Educational research: An introduction (8th ed. ). Boston: Pearson A & B. ( Received 26 April 2014; accepted 02 May 2014 ).

Show More Hide