Reengineering some Uncertainties about Communicational Relationships

Vlăduţescu, Ştefan

doi:10.18052/www.scipress.com/ILSHS.25.73

ILSHS > ILSHS Volume 25 > Reengineering some Uncertainties about...

< Back to Volume

Reengineering some Uncertainties about Communicational Relationships

Removed due to low scientific level

Full Text PDF

Abstract:

The impulse to start the current research is represented by the ascertainment that in the universe of communication there is a persistence of uncertainties regarding the place and the functions of communicational relationship in the processes of communication. This study takes into account the fact that in the nuclear center of communication there is a communicational relationship. The investigation focuses on revealing the conceptual articulations for understanding the idea of communicational relationship. We emphasize the fact that, on the first level, communication is a voluntary social involvement, an intentional existential manifestation. The so-called involuntary aspects of communication are moments of loss of control on generating meanings. There cannot be communication without a will for communication. The meanings are the first level of human will and desire for communication. The second level is the message. Communication itself appears as an integrative third level of human will for communication. We help the emergence to be seen and delineate the criteria for the comprehension of communicational relationships: existential manifestation, the classes of communicators (actors, agents, actants, interactants, transactants), transactivity (transactional criterion), and repetition (iteration). The conclusion is that the communicational relationship is an interpersonal-iterative, transactional and life-existential meaningful manifestation.

Info:

Periodical:

International Letters of Social and Humanistic Sciences (Volume 25)

Pages:

73-81

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18052/www.scipress.com/ILSHS.25.73

Citation:

Ş. Vlăduţescu, "Reengineering some Uncertainties about Communicational Relationships", International Letters of Social and Humanistic Sciences, Vol. 25, pp. 73-81, 2014

Online since:

March 2014

Authors:

Ştefan Vlăduţescu

Keywords:

Communication Uncertainties, Communicational Relationship, Life Manifestation

Export:

RIS, BibTeX, Text

Distribution:

Open Access

This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License

References:

[1] Hendriks P. (2010). Empirical evidence for embodied semantics. In Logic, Language and Meaning (pp.1-10). Springer Berlin Heidelberg.

[2] A. Borowski, International Letters of Social and Humanistic Sciences 11 (2014) 1-168.

[3] Nakane I., Negotiating silence and speech in the classroom. Multilingua-Journal of Cross-Cultural and Interlanguage Communication 24(1-2) (2005) 75-100.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/mult.24.1part2.75

[4] Aligică P. D. (2007). Prophecies of doom and scenarios of progress. Continuum International Pub. Group.

[5] Batâr D. (2003). Sociologie. Sibiu: Editura Psihomedia.

[6] A. Borowski, International Letters of Social and Humanistic Sciences 4 (2013) 70-74.

[7] T. Lis, P. Bajdor (2013). Sales Logistics as a Model Used by Companies Fulfilling Individual Customer's Needs. In: Challenges in Contemporary Management. Monograph. Scientific Editors Anna Lemańska-Majdzik, Piotr Tomski, Sekcja Wydaw. WZ PCzęst, Czestochowa.

[8] Bădescu I. (2010). Relaţiile sociale. Spaţiul dens. Noi teorii asupra relaţiilor sociale. In D. Otovescu (Coord.), Tratat de Sociologie Generală. Craiova: Editura Beladi.

[9] R. Barker (2012). Social networking and identity, Chapter in: The Handbook of Research on Technoself: Identity in a Technological Society. IGI-Global (www.igi-global.com/ijt).

[10] Boudon R. (2006). Acţiunea. In R. Boudon (Coord.), Tratat de sociologie. Bucureşti: Editura Humanitas.

[11] Kinga Dziwańska, International Letters of Social and Humanistic Sciences 7 (2013) 96-112.

[12] Bourdieu P. (1990). In other words. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

[13] Calhoun C. (1992). The infrastructure of modernity: indirect social relationships, information technology, and social integration. In H. Haferkamp & N. J. Smelser (Eds), Social Change and Modernity. Berkeley: University of California Press.

[14] W. Louw (2014). Designing Learning Experiences to Prepare Lifelong Learners for the Complexities of the Workplace. In Psycho-social Career Meta-capacities (pp.307-319). Springer International Publishing.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-00645-1_17

[15] Giddens A. (1984). The Constitution of Society. University of California Press.

[16] Goodman N. (1998). Introducere în sociologie. Bucureşti: Editura Lider.

[17] M. Tshesane, Crime Research in South Africa 3(3) (2001) 8.

[18] Lebow R. N. (1996). The art of bargaining. London: The John Hopkins Universit Press.

[19] Mucha J. (2003). The concept of social relations in classic analytical in classic analytical interpretative sociology: Weber and Znaniecki, 6th ESA Conference-Murcia 2003, Research Networks, no 21, pp.1-21.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004332966_009

[20] A. Borowski, International Letters of Social and Humanistic Sciences 2 (2014) 110-121.

[21] Preda M. (2006). Comportament organizaţional. Iaşi: Editura Polirom.

[22] Schutz A. (1971). The Social World and the Theory of Social Action. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.

[23] Teodorescu A. (1998). Relaţia socială. In C. Zamfir & L. Vlăsceanu (Eds.), Dicţionar de sociologie. Bucureşti: Editura Babel.

[24] Weber M. (1978). Economy and Society. University of California Press.

[25] R. Barker, The Journal of Management and World Business Research 6(1) (2009).

[26] J. MaCliam, R. Barker, Communicare 28(1) (2009).

[27] Otovescu D., Păsătoiu F., Petcu R. (2010). Grupurile social-umane, în Otovescu D., (Coord.), Tratat de Sociologie Generală. Craiova: Editura Beladi.

[28] N. Iancu, Revista Română de Studii de Intelligence 05 (2011) 124-136.

[29] S. Sonderling (1995). Historical research in communication, in Du Plooy, G.M. (Ed) Introduction to communication, Course Book 2: Communication research. Cape Town: Juta.

[30] A. Borowski, International Letters of Social and Humanistic Sciences 3 (2013) 69-74.

[31] G. C. Angelopulo, R. Barker (2013). Integrated Organisational Communication. 2nd Edition. Cape Town: Juta.

[32] Bârgăoanu A., Negrea E., Dascălu R., Journal of Media Research 3(1) (2010).

[33] S. Sonderling (1996). Language, in Fourie, P.J. (Ed) Introduction to communication, Course Book 3: Communication and the production of meaning. Cape Town: Juta.

[34] Delia Cristina Balaban (2013). Development of Communication Science in Romania. Challenges and Perspecives. Professional Communication and Translation Studies, 6.

[35] Sandu Frunză (2014). Advertising and Administration under the Pressure of Ethics. Les Arcs: Editions de la Suers.

[36] P. J. Fourie (Ed.). (2010). Media studies: media history, media and society (Vol. 2). Juta and Company Ltd.

[37] A. Borowski, International Letters of Social and Humanistic Sciences 4 (2013) 70-74.

[38] M. Brie, I. Horga, Eurolimes 9 (2010) 155-171.

[39] D. F. Du Plessis (Ed.). (2001). Introduction to Public Relations and Advertising. Juta and Company Ltd.

[40] R. Barker (2003). Connecting to culture, Chapter in: Strategic organizational communication: paradigms and paradoxes. Heinemann: Sandown.

[41] G. C. Maior, Revista Română de Studii de Intelligence 01-02 (2009) 5-8.

[42] A. Borowski, International Letters of Social and Humanistic Sciences 6 (2013) 86-90.

[43] Marioara Avram, Aurelia Traistaru, International Letters of Social and Humanistic Sciences 13 (2014) 79-88.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.18052/www.scipress.com/ilshs.24.79

[44] Y. Katagiri, K. Takanashi, M. Ishizaki, Y. Den, M. Enomoto, Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences 97 (2013) 422-428.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.10.254

[45] N. Munteanu (2013). The Influence of Media Communication on the Military Organizations. Buletin Stiintific.

[46] Sandu Frunza, Revista de cercetare şi intervenţie socială 31 (2011) 155-171.

[47] S. Sonderling, Communicatio 38(1) (2012) 64-83.

[48] A. Goodwin-Davey, C. Davey, Progressio 22(1) (2000).

[49] Janusz Grabara, Michal Kolcun, Sebastian Kot (2014). The role of information systems in transport logistics. International.

[50] M. Ishizaki, T. Kato (1998, August). Exploring the characteristics of multi-party dialogues. In Proceedings of the 36th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics and 17th International Conference on Computational Linguistics-Volume 1 (pp.583-589). Association for Computational Linguistics.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3115/980845.980942

[51] Stefan Freytag, International Letters of Social and Humanistic Sciences 10 (2013) 25-31.

[52] Ioana-Narcisa Creţu (2009). Introducere în ştiinţele comunicării. Note de curs. Sibiu. Editura Universităţii Lucian Blaga.

[53] Marian Siminică, Aurelia Traistaru, International Journal of Education and Research 1(12) (2013).

[54] S. Craft, C. N. Davis (2013). Principles of American Journalism: An Introduction. Routledge.

[55] P. Dobrescu, A. Bârgăoanu (2001). Geopolitica. Fac. de Comunicare şi Relaţii Publice" David Ogilvy". ( Received 20 March 2014; accepted 26 March 2014 ).

Show More Hide

Cited By:

This article has no citations.