Subscribe

Subscribe to our Newsletter and get informed about new publication regulary and special discounts for subscribers!

ILSHS > Volume 24 > Two New Interpretation of Plato's Protagoras
Two New Interpretation of Plato's Protagoras
< Back to Volume

Two New Interpretation of Plato's Protagoras

Full Text PDF

Abstract:

As we know, one of the most important ideas of Protagoras is Epistemic Relativism that this theory is attributed to him during the history of philosophy, without any dispute; But in the new era commentators such as Dr. Qavam Safari and Cornford by further and more precise reading the conversations between Protagoras and Theaetetus have concluded to this belief that Plato has interpreted the Protagoras’ rule of “Humanism“, by assimilating it with a course which he calls it “secret” and also the theory of Theaetetus “knowledge = perceiving”, in a way that it leads to perfect and very sophisticated relativism; and then in an ahistorical effort, Plato has imposed this relativism to the Protagoras’ mind. Whether this claim is proved or remained only as a claim, it should be discussed; so we have attempted to address this important issue in the present article.

Info:

Periodical:
International Letters of Social and Humanistic Sciences (Volume 24)
Pages:
12-25
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18052/www.scipress.com/ILSHS.24.12
Citation:
S. Javanmardi and S. B. Motlaq, "Two New Interpretation of Plato's Protagoras", International Letters of Social and Humanistic Sciences, Vol. 24, pp. 12-25, 2014
Online since:
March 2014
Authors:
Sana Javanmardi, Saeed Binaaye Motlaq
Keywords:
Humanism, Plato, Protagoras, Relativism, Sophist
Export:
RIS, BibTeX, Text
Distribution:
Open Access

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License

References:

Barnes, Johnathan, The Presocratic Philosophers, Routledge, London, (1989).

Copleston, Frederick, Volume 1, History of Greek and Roman philosophy, Translated by Seyyed Jalal al-Din Mojtabavi, Edition 4, Tehran: Cultural and Scientific Publishing Co and Soroush Press, (2001).

Cornford, F. M., Plato's Theory of Knowledge, fifth impression, Routledge & Kegan Paul, London, (1960).

Diels, H. and Kranz, Ancilla to the Pre-Socratic Philosophers, A complete translation of the Fragments in Diels Fragment der Vorsokratiker by: Kathleen Freeman, Cambrifge, Massachusetts: Harvrd University press, (1948).

Durant, William James, History of Civilization, Volume 2, A group of translators, Tehran: Teaching Islamic Revolution, (1991).

Foroughi, M. A, Development of Philosophy in Europe, Alborz Publication, Tehran, (1996).

Guthrie, W. K. C, History of Greek Philosophy, Vol 2: Anaximander & Anoximenes, Translated by Hassan Fathy, Fekr-e-rouz publications, (1996).

Guthrie, W. K. C, History of Greek Philosophy, Vol 10: Sophists (Part One), Translated by Hassan Fathy, Fekr-e-rouz publications, (1996).

Guthrie, W. K. C, History of Greek Philosophy, Vol 11: Sophists (Part Two), Translated by Hassan Fathy, Fekr-e-rouz publications, (1996).

Guthrie, W. K. C, A History of Greek Philosophy, Volume One, Cambridge University Press, London, (1962).

Show More Hide
Cited By:
This article has no citations.