Uncertainty Communication Status: Theory or Science

Vlăduţescu, Ştefan

doi:10.18052/www.scipress.com/ILSHS.21.100

ILSHS > ILSHS Volume 21 > Uncertainty Communication Status: Theory or...

< Back to Volume

Uncertainty Communication Status: Theory or Science

Removed due to low scientific level

Full Text PDF

Abstract:

In this study, we argue in favor of the thesis that communication as an academic discipline faces many uncertainties. One of these is the uncertainty regarding the status. Some talk about Communication theory, others about the Communication Science, about Communicology, "Sciences de l'Information et de la Communication" (SIC), Communication studies etc. Nuclear question about the status of the communication is: the study of communication is a theory or a science, is a weak cogitative system or a strong cogitative system We distinguish five causes that determined communication study to remain to this day a weak cogitative system: the effervescence of the theoretical-scientific and practical researches in a knowledge area full of promises; heavy coagulation of a cogitational communication community; refusal of the rule; articulation of communicational thinking as “weak thinking” - “weak thought” G. Vattimo); and the delay in the development of the communication ontology. Discipline that studies communication is a weak-cogitative thinking system, a sum of theories but not yet a science. As a set of weak theories, the study of communication is becoming science. In any case, discipline that studies communication is on the way to become a science.

Info:

Periodical:

International Letters of Social and Humanistic Sciences (Volume 21)

Pages:

100-106

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18052/www.scipress.com/ILSHS.21.100

Citation:

Ş. Vlăduţescu, "Uncertainty Communication Status: Theory or Science", International Letters of Social and Humanistic Sciences, Vol. 21, pp. 100-106, 2014

Online since:

February 2014

Authors:

Ştefan Vlăduţescu

Keywords:

Communication Ontology, Uncertainty of Communication, Weak Cogitative System

Export:

RIS, BibTeX, Text

Distribution:

Open Access

This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License

References:

[1] Abrudan M. C., Journal for the Study of Religions and Ideologies 12(34) (2013) 237-250.

[2] Babrow A. S., Journal of Communication 51(3) (2001) 553-573.

[3] Borowski A. (a), International Letters of Social and Humanistic Sciences 6 (2013) 86-90.

[4] Balaban, Delia Cristina; Abrudan, Mirela Codruța, Revista Transilvană de Științe ale Comunicării 2(13) (2011) 3-8.

[5] Balaban, Delia Cristina (2013). Development of Communication Science in Romania Challenges and Perspecives. Professional Communication and Translation Studies.

[6] Barr D. J. (2001). Trouble in mind: Paralinguistic indices of effort and uncertainty in communication. In C. Cavé, I. Guäitella, S. Santi (Eds.), Oralité et gestualité: Interactions et comportements multimodaux dans la communication, 597-600.

[7] Berger C. R., Calabrese R. J., Human Communication Research 1 (1975) 99-112.

[8] Berger C. R., Gudykunst W. B. (1991). Uncertainty and communication. In B. Dervin & M. Voight (Eds.), Progress in communication sciences (pp.21-66). Vol. 10. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.

[9] Berger C. R., Roloff M. E., Roskos-Ewoldsen D. (2010). What is Communication Science? In C. R. Berger, M. E. Roloff & D. Roskos-Ewoldsen (Eds.), The Handbook of Communication Science (pp.3-20). (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412982818.n1

[10] Borowski A. (b), International Letters of Social and Humanistic Sciences 4 (2013) 70-74.

[11] Bârgăoanu Alina, Negrea Elena, Dascălu Roxana (2010). Communicating the European (Lack of) Union. An Analysis of Greece's Financial Crisis in Communication Terms.

[12] Buşu Oprea-Valentin, Buşu Oana-Cristina, International Letters of Social and Humanistic Sciences 9 (2014) 100-107.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.18052/www.scipress.com/ilshs.20.100

[13] Carravetta P. (2012). What Is Weak Thought", The Original Theses and context of il pensiero debole. In G. Vattimo & A. Rovatti (Eds.), Weak Thought. New York Press.

[14] Cobley P., Schulz P. J. (2013). Introduction. In P. Cobley & P. J. Schulz (Eds.), Theories and Models of Communication (pp.1-16). (Vol. 1). Walter de Gruyter.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110240450.1

[15] Craig R. T. (2013). Constructing theories in communication research. In P. Cobley & P. J. Schulz (Eds.), Theories and Models of Communication (pp.39-57). Walter de Gruyter.

[16] Crețu Ioana-Narcisa, Introducere în ştiințele comunicării. Note de curs, Editura Universității Lucian Blaga din Sibiu, (2009).

[17] Dâncu V. S. (1999). Comunicarea simbolică. Arhitectura discursului publicitar. Dacia, Cluj-Napoca.

[18] De la Peza Casares, M. (2013). Los estudios de comunicación: disciplina o indisciplina. Comunicación y sociedad, (20), 11-32.

[19] Tittenbrun J., International Letters of Social and Humanistic Sciences 2 (2014) 20-40.

[20] Duarte L., Alonso G. (2008). Perspective for Development of Theories of Communication in Latin America. Paper presented at The Annual Meeting of the International Communication Association, Marriott Hotel, San Diego, 2008, http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p111743_index.html.

[21] Fârte G. I. (2004). Comunicarea. O abordare praxiologică. Iaşi: Editura Demiurg.

[22] Goldsmith D. J., Journal of Communication 51(3) (2001) 514-533.

[23] Grant C. B. (2007). Uncertainty and communication: New theoretical investigations. Palgrave Macmillan.

[24] Knight F. H. (2012). Risk, uncertainty and profit. DoverPublications.com.

[25] Koester J., Lustig M. (2012). Intercultural competence: Interpersonal communication across cultures. Pearson Prentice Hall.

[26] Kulczycki E. (2008). Status komunikologii – przyczynek do dyskusji. Poznań.

[27] Littlejohn S. W., Foss K. A. (2008). Theories of human communication. (9th ed.). Belmont, CA, Thompson Wadsworth.

[28] Maior George Cristian (2009). Incertitudine. Gândire strategică şi relaţii internaţionale în secolul XXI. București: Editura Rao.

[29] Mensch J. R. (2004). Knowing and Being. Penn State Press.

[30] Mucundorfeanu M., Abrudan M., Journal of Media Research-Revista de Studii Media 5 (2009) 89-100.

[31] Narula U., (2006). Communication Models. New Delhi: Atlantic.

[32] Pavalache-Ilie M. (2012). Deprinderi de comunicare. Internet source.

[33] Siminică Marian, Traistaru Aurelia (2013). Self-Directed Learning in Economic Education.

[34] Pavalache-Ilie, M.; Unianu, E. M., Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences 33 (2012) 198-202.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.01.111

[35] Radu Cristian, Journal of Media Research-Revista de Studii Media, 1 (12) (2012) 15-26.

[36] Wendland, Michał, Dialogue and Universalism 1 (2013) 51-63.

[37] Radu Cristian, Journal for the Study of Religions and Ideologies 31 (2012) 206-222.

[38] Ritt A. (2003). Comunicarea organizaţională externă. Timişoara: Editura Mirton.

[39] Rus F. C. (2004). Relaţii publice şi publicitate. Iaşi, Institutul European.

[40] Stoica D. S., Revista Transilvană de Ştiinţe ale Comunicării 5 (2007) 60-64.

[41] Vattimo G. (2012). Dialectics, Difference, Weak Thought. In G. Vattimo & A. Rovatti (Eds.), Weak Thought. New York Press.

[42] Borowski A. (c), International Letters of Social and Humanistic Sciences 7 (2013) 113-118.

[43] Bârgăoanu Alina, Negrea Elena, Dascălu Roxana (2010). The Emergence of a European Public Sphere. An analysis of Europe's News Website presseurop. eu.

[44] Iorgulescu Alexandra, International Letters of Social and Humanistic Sciences 7 (2014) 14-21. ( Received 22 January 2014; accepted 27 January 2014 ).

Show More Hide

Cited By:

This article has no citations.