Subscribe

Subscribe to our Newsletter and get informed about new publication regulary and special discounts for subscribers!

ILSHS > Volume 2 > Difficulties in Adaptation of Religious...
< Back to Volume

Difficulties in Adaptation of Religious Terminology on Requirements of Teaching

Full Text PDF

Abstract:

The effectiveness of teaching the religion depends on the degree of the linguistic efficiency for the sender and for the recipient and by the degree of linguistic awareness of the religion instruction teacher i.e. his knowledge about mechanisms of the linguistic intercommunication. In the religious education transmission it seems essential to be perceiving language of the religious education by pupils. Amongst pupils and religion instruction teachers from primary schools and post-secondary a belief that the new manuals are adapted for the age and the level of the religious knowledge of pupils is dominating, they aren't proposing more serious linguistic problems concerning remarks. This belief results from the low-end acquaintance of the religious /terminology pupil’s/ and of religion instruction teacher’s /conformism/. Pupils of upper secondary schools are more conscious of their gaps in the knowledge of a language religious however the little percentage is only trying to make up for these gaps through the participation in active religious education /especially this beyond the school/.

Info:

Periodical:
International Letters of Social and Humanistic Sciences (Volume 2)
Pages:
61-66
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18052/www.scipress.com/ILSHS.2.61
Citation:
A. Borowski "Difficulties in Adaptation of Religious Terminology on Requirements of Teaching", International Letters of Social and Humanistic Sciences, Vol. 2, pp. 61-66, 2013
Online since:
Sep 2013
Authors:
Andrzej Borowski
Keywords:
Conformism, Language of the Religious Education, Linguistic Awareness, Linguistic Signs, Religious Education
Export:
RIS, BibTeX, Text
Distribution:
Open Access

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License

References:

J. Ratzinger, Raport o stanie wiary, Kraków- Warszawa, 1986, s. 62-63.

R. Pawłowska, Z zagadnień sprawności językowej w nauczaniu religii, w: /red. M. Karpluk, J. Sambor/, O języku religijnym, Lublin, 1988, s. 71-87.

Z. Modzelewska, Więź 4 (1988) 22-30.

R. Niparko, Więź 9 (1989) 76-85.

A. Szwajkajzer, Młodzież o lekcjach religii w szkole, w: /red. K. Koseła, K. Kiciński, W. Pawlik/, Szkoła czy parafia- nauka religii w szkole w świetle badań socjologicznych Kraków, 1995, s. 141-160.

K. Pawlina, Przegląd powszechny 11 (1996) 206-213.

J. Szymczyk, Więź 1 (1997) 116-122.

M. Robak, Więź 10 (2000) 97-106.

A. Draguła, Więź 8-9 (2003) 55-66.

P. Nonis, Communio 8(1993) 100.

T. Uszkiewicz, Szczecińskie Studia Kościelne 6 (1995) 129-133.

B. Moyers, Let There Be Light, w: Religion from the Center for the Study of Values at Harvard Divinity School, t. 2 nr 3/4.

S. Kulpaczyński, Katechetyczna dydaktyka modlitwy, Lublin, 1989, s. 105-106.

J. Audinet, Catechese 3 (1963) 470.

ks. Marek, Znak 11 (1996) 90-92. ( Received 23 April 2013; accepted 26 April 2013 ).

Show More Hide