Subscribe

Subscribe to our Newsletter and get informed about new publication regulary and special discounts for subscribers!

ILSHS > Volume 2 > Introduction to the Academic Perspectives of CSR...
Introduction to the Academic Perspectives of CSR Measurement
< Back to Volume

Introduction to the Academic Perspectives of CSR Measurement

Full Text PDF

Abstract:

There is much interest and a growing number of studies on the measurement of what is known as corporate social responsibility (CSR). This growing attention is mainly due to the inexistence of unanimity with reference to its measurement due to the large amount of research on this topic. This lack of consensus requires an exhaustive study of the different methods for measuring this notion, so as to clarify and identify the main limitations of each of them, in order to advance knowledge on the current state of CSR.

Info:

Periodical:
International Letters of Social and Humanistic Sciences (Volume 2)
Pages:
51-55
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18052/www.scipress.com/ILSHS.2.51
Citation:
P. Martínez and I. R. del Bosque, "Introduction to the Academic Perspectives of CSR Measurement", International Letters of Social and Humanistic Sciences, Vol. 2, pp. 51-55, 2013
Online since:
September 2013
Authors:
Patricia Martínez, Ignacio Rodríguez del Bosque
Keywords:
Corporate Social Responsibility, Measurement
Export:
RIS, BibTeX, Text
Distribution:
Open Access

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License

References:

Aupperle K., Carroll A., Hatfield J., Academy of Management Journal 28(2) (1985) 446-463.

Baucus M. S., Baucus D. A., Academy of Management Journal 40(1) (1997) 129-1511.

Bigné E., Andreu L., Chumpitaz R., Swaen V., Universia Business Review 5 (2005) 14-27.

Bragdon J. H., Marlin J. A., Risk Management 19 (1972) 918.

Brown T., Dacin P., Journal of Marketing 61(1) (1997) 68-84.

Carroll A. B., Academy of Management Review 184 (1979) 497-505.

Carroll A. B., Business and Society 38(3) (1999) 268-295.

Clarkson M., Academy of Management Review 20(1) (1995) 92-117.

Davidson W. N., Worrell D. L., Akron Business and Economic Review 21 (1990) 7-19.

Decker O. S., Managerial Auditing Journal 19(6) (2004) 712-728.

Freeman R. E., Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Boston, MA: Pitman, (1984).

García de los Salmones, M., Crespo A., Rodríguez del Bosque I., Journal of Business Ethics 61(4) (2005) 369-385.

Gray R., Kouhy R., Lavers S., Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal 8(2) (1995) 47-77.

Griffin J. J., Mahon J. F., Business & Society 36(1) (1997) 5-31.

Holloway C. J., Marketing for tourism, Harlow: Prentice Hall, (2004).

Maignan I., Ferrell O. C., Journal of Business Ethics 23(3) (2000) 283-297.

Maignan I., Ferrell O. C., Journal of Business Research 56(1) (2003) 55-67.

Maignan I., Ferrell O. C., Hult G. T. M., Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 27(4) (1999) 455-469.

McGuire J., Sundgren A., Schneeweis T., Academy of Management Journal 31(4) (1988) 854-872.

Panapanaan V., Linnanen L., Karvonen M., Phan V., Journal of Business Ethics 44(2) (2003) 133-148.

Panwar R., Rinne T., Hansen E., Juslin H., Forest Products Journal 56(2) (2006) 4-12.

Pinkston T., Carroll A., Journal of Business Ethics 13(3) (1994) 157-169.

Singhapakdi A., Kraft K. L., Vitell S. J., Rallapalli K. C., Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 23(1) (1995) 49-56.

Stanwick P., Stanwick S., Journal of Business Ethics 17(2) (1998) 195-204.

Swaen V., Chumpitaz R., Bigné E., Andreu L., Being a socially responsible company: What does it mean for European young consumers?, Paper presented at 32nd European Marketing Academy Conference, Glasgow, United Kingdom. May, (2003).

Turban D. B., Greening D. W., Academy of Management Journal 40 (1996) 658-672.

Turker D., Journal of Business Ethics 85(4) (2009) 411-427.

van Marrewijk M., Journal of Business Ethics 44(2) (2003) 95-105. ( Received 29 April 2013; accepted 30 April 2013 ).

Show More Hide