Subscribe

Subscribe to our Newsletter and get informed about new publication regulary and special discounts for subscribers!

ILNS > Volume 58 > Abundance Frequency of Plant Species as Animal...
< Back to Volume

Abundance Frequency of Plant Species as Animal Feeds to Determine Ideal Cattle Grazing

Full Text PDF

Abstract:

The objectives of this study were to determine the dominant frequency of plant species, and provide useful information toward the conservation management of animal feed in grazing areas, Hiroshima, Japan. The numbers of plant species were 32 and 21 in spring and summer, respectively. The appearance frequency of plant species more than 50% in the spring, consist of Veronica arvensis (75.57%), Trifolium repens (73.86%), Paspalum dilatatum (69.32%), Lamium purpureum (68.75%), Trifolium dubium (65.34%), Cerastium glomeratum (63.64%), whereas in summer, it consists of Paspalum notatum (98.30%), Trifolium repens (81.25%), Paspalum dilatatum (78.98%), and Kyllinga brevifolia (74.43%). It was observed that the frequencies of plant species were 16.64 and 21.55 cm; vegetation cover rates were 77.18 and 81.36%; chlorophyll content were 41.72 and 36.28 mg/g Fw, and species numbers were 17.91 and 10.18, in spring and summer, respectively. Findings of this research propose that Trifolium repens (clover), Rumex japonicus (weed), and Paspalum dilatatum (grass) are dominant species in the studied areas that can be utilized as animal feeds.

Info:

Periodical:
International Letters of Natural Sciences (Volume 58)
Pages:
70-76
Citation:
R. Yulianto et al., "Abundance Frequency of Plant Species as Animal Feeds to Determine Ideal Cattle Grazing", International Letters of Natural Sciences, Vol. 58, pp. 70-76, 2016
Online since:
September 2016
Export:
Distribution:
References:

[1] M.A. Altieri, Biodiversity and pest management in agroecosystems, Howarth Press, New York, (1994).

[2] L. Astigaraga, Peyraud, L. Delaby, Effect of nitrogen fertilizer rate and protein supplementation on the herbage intake and the nitrogen balance of grazing dairy cows, Animal Res. 4 (2002) 279-293.

[3] M.D. McMahon et al., Too close for comfort: Effect of trap spacing distance and pattern on statistical inference of behavioral choice test in the field, Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata. 136 (2010) 66-71.

[4] R.J. Whittaker et al., Species richness on towards a general, theory of species diversity hierarchical theories of diversity, J. Biogeography. 28 (2001) 453-470.

[5] P. Dumont, Appearance of biomarkers of in-vitro ageing after successive stimulations of WI-38 fibroblast with IL-1a and TNF-a: Senescence associated 𝛽-galactosidase activity and morphotype transition, J. Anat. 197 (2000) 529-537.

[6] I.J. Gordon, Intake and Diet Selection by Sheep Grazing Grass/Clover Patches, Proceedings of the 18th International Grassland Society, 23 (1997), Session 5 ID NO. 25: 5-11.

[7] A.J. Rook et al., Effect of long-term changes in relative resource availability on dietary preference of grazing sheep for perennial ryegrass and white clover, Grass and Forage Sci. 57 (2002) 54-60.

[8] M. Meisser et al., Foraging behavior and occupation pattern of beef cows on a heterogeneous pasture in the Swiss Alp, Czech J. Ani. Sci. 50 (2014) 84-95.

[9] K. Kawamura et al., Mapping herbage biomass and nitrogen status in an Italian ryegrass (Lolium multiflorum L) field using a digital video camera with balon system, Journal of Applied Remote Sensing. 5(1) (2011) 053562.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1117/1.3659893

[10] Braun-Blanquet, Pflanzensosiologie: Grunzuge der Vegetation-skunde, 3te aufl. Spring-Verlag, (1964).

[11] L.C. Bliss, Rosine and lipid contents in alpine tundra plants, Ecology. 43 (1962) 753-757.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1933473

[12] J. Sharma et al., Phosphorus solubilizing capabilities of microorganisms isolated from grapevine rhizophere and non rhizhosphere soil, J. Eco-Friendly Agric. 7 (2012) 38-42.

[13] Marquis, Effect of deer browsing on timber production in Alleghheny harwood forest of Northwestern in Pennsylvania. U. S, Forest Service Research Paper NE-475, (1981).

[14] N.G. Tilghman, Impact of white-tailed deer on forest regeneration in Northwestern Pennsylvania, J. Wildlife Manag. 53 (1989) 524-532.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/3809172

[15] J.R. Brown, J.W. Stuth, How herbivory effects grazing tolerant and sensitive grass in a central Texas grassland: integrating plant response across hierachical level, Oikos. 67 (1993) 291-298.

[16] C.P.H. Mulder C.P. H, Vertebrata herbivores and plants in the Arctic and subarctic: Effect on individuals, populations, communities and ecosystems, Perspectives in Plant Ecology, Evolution and Systematics. 2 (1989) 29-55.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1078/1433-8319-00064

[17] A.J. Hester et al., Impact of large herbivores on plant community structur dinamics and concervation, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. (2006) 97-141.

[18] J. Chen, M. Shiyomi, Y. Yamamura, Frequency distribution model for spatial patterns of vegetation abundance, Ecol. Mod. 211 (2008) 403-410.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2007.09.017

[19] M.J. Metzger et al., The ATEAM vulnerability mapping tool, Quantitative approaches in systems analysis no. 27, CD-ROM publication, Office C.T. de Wit Graduate School for Production Ecology and Resource Concervation (PE and RC), Wagenigen, the Netherlands a climatic stratification of the environment of Europe, (2004).

[20] P.B. Adler, D.A. Raff, W.K. Launeroth, The effect of grazing on the spatial heterogeneity of vegetation, Oecol. 128(4) (2001) 465-479.

[21] S.J. McNaughton, Compensantory plant growth as response to herbivore, Oikos. 40 (1983) 329-336.

[22] D.J. Augustine, Mc Naughton, Ungulate effect on the functional species composition of plant communities: herbivore selectivity nd plant tolerance, J. Wildlife Manag. 62 (1988) 1165-1183.

[23] D. Tillman, The ecological consequences of change in biodiversity a search for general principles, Ecology. 80 (1999) 1455-1474.

[24] M.L. Rosenzweig, Species diversity in space and time. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, (1995).

[25] D. Tillman, Community invisibility recruitment limitation and grassland biodiversity, Ecology. 78 (1997) 81-92.

[26] S. Kuksal et al., Phytosociological investigation and live from pattern of grazing lands under pine canopy in temperature zone, Northwest Himalaya India, Res. J. Bot. 4 (2009) 55-69.

[27] M. Nannete, L. Deacon, C. Robinson, Greater nitrogen and/or phosporus availability increase plant species cover and diversity at a High Artic popular semi desert, Polar Biol. 30 (2007) 559-570.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00300-006-0213-7

[28] S. Zaman, Effect of rainfall and grazing on vegetation yield and cover of two arid rangelands in Kuwait, Environ. Conserv. 24 (1997) 344-350.

[29] C. Skarpe, Structure of the woody vegetation in disturbed and undisturbed arid Savana, Botswana, Plant Ecology. 87 (1990) 11-18.

[30] R.A. Richards, Selectable traits to increase crop photosynthesis and yield of grain crop, J. Exp Bot. 51 (2000) 447-458.

[31] L.C. Hulbert, Fire and litter affect in undisturbed bluestem prairie in Kansan, Ecology. 50 (1969) 874-877.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1933702

[32] B.A. Kimball, Carbon-dioxide and agricultural yield: An assemblage and analysis of 430 prior observations, Agronomy J. 75 (1983) 779-778.

[33] Cao M, F.I. Woodward, Dynamic responses of terrestrial ecosystem carbon cycling to global climate change, Nature. 393 (1998) 249-252.

[34] D. T Tissue, W. C Oechel, Response of Eriphorum vaginatum to elevated CO2 and temperature in the Alaskan Tussock Tundra, Ecology. 68 (1987) 401-410.

[35] N.C.H. Fetcher et al., Long term elevation of atmospheric CO2 concentration and the carbon exchange rate saplings of Pinus taeda L. and Liquitambar styrachiflua L, Tree Physiol. 4 (1988) 255-262.

[36] R.F. Sage, T. D Sharkey, J.R. Seeman, Acclimation of photosynthesis to elevated CO2 in five C3 species, Plant Physiol. 89 (1989) 590-596.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.89.2.590

[37] W.C. Oechel, B.R. Strain, Native species responses Chapter 5, pp.118-154, in B.R. Strain and J. D Cure (eds), Direct Effect of Carbon Dioxide on Vegetation, State of the Art Report, U. S Department of Energy Office of Basic Energy Science, Carbon Dioxide Research Division. Washington, DC, (1985).

[38] R.M. Gifford, H. Lambers, J.I. L Morison, Respiration of crop species under CO2 enrichment, Physiologia Plantarum. 63 (1985) 351-356.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1399-3054.1985.tb02309.x
Show More Hide