Subscribe to our Newsletter and get informed about new publication regulary and special discounts for subscribers!

ILNS > Volume 51 > Zooplankton of Mokraya Sura River
< Back to Volume

Zooplankton of Mokraya Sura River

Full Text PDF


Structural and functional characteristics of zooplankton as well as the results of biotesting were researched to indicate the ecological status of Mokraya Sura river sites. Zooplankton sampling was performed at the sites of Mokraya Sura river in autumn 2014 and in spring 2015. Species composition and abundance of zooplankton showed that zooplankton is most depressed at the upper sites of the river due to joint effect of slime accumulation eutrophication and industrial sewage. Biotesting results estimated water quality of the site near aeration plant sewage emergency discharge as most polluted of the river sites where large abundance and biomass of zooplankton were created mostly by planktonic rotifers. Large figures of filter-seeding crustaceans as well as low saprobity index indicate improvement in water quality at the sites 3 km and 2 km upstream from the river mouth.


International Letters of Natural Sciences (Volume 51)
V. Yakovenko and E. Fedonenko, "Zooplankton of Mokraya Sura River", International Letters of Natural Sciences, Vol. 51, pp. 29-35, 2016
Online since:
Feb 2016

[1] B. Baranovskiy (2000). Macrophytes of the channel plain reservoirs, Dnepropetrovsk, 172p.

[2] E. Biesinger G. Christensen (1972). Effects of various metals on survival, growth, reproduction, and metabolism of Daphrria magna J. Fish. Res. Board Canada, Vol. 29, p.1691 – 1700.

DOI: 10.1139/f72-269

[3] R. Claudia, P. Elena (1979). Life tables of Philodina roseola (Rotifera) under conditions of chronic cadmium and zinc stress, Bolletino di zoologia, Vol. 46 (3), pp.209-216.

DOI: 10.1080/11250007909440300

[4] A. Dyha, V. Rubanenko (1977). Dynamics of zooplankton of Zaporozskoe reservoir bays under the eutrophication process, Circulation of matter and energy in water bodies, Listvennichnoe on Lake Baikal, p.166–169.

[5] E. Gladyshev M. Meselson (2008). Extreme resistance of bdelloid rotifers to ionizing radiation, Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, Vol. 105(13), p.5139–5144.

DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0800966105

[6] I. Grib, A. Merezhko (1991). The main directions of the strategy to protect and restore the ecosystems of small rivers, ІІ All-Union Conference on fisheries toxicology, Vol. 1., St. Petersburg, p.135 – 136.

[7] I. Kiselev (1956). Methods of Plankton Study, in the Life of Fresh Waters, Moscow, Vol. 4 (1), pp.183-265.

[8] I. Konovets, L. Kinnis (2006). Biotesting of surface water bodies and bottom deposits by using of Cladocers, in Methods of of surface waterbodies hydroecological studies, edited by. V. D Romanenko, Кiev, p.340 – 365.

[9] A. Krylov (1996). The Zooplankton of Small Rivers under Different Anthropogenic Loads, Abstract of Cand. Sci. (Biol. ) Dissertation, Borok.

[10] A. Krylov (1993).

[11] L. Кutikova (2005). Bdelloid rotifers of Russia fauna / Proceedings of the Zoological Institute RAS. Vol. 305, Moscow. KMK Scientific Press Ltd., 315 p.

[12] A. Merezhko (1987). Ecological problems of small rivers exploitation, Hydrobiological journal, Vol. 23 (1) , p.3 – 7.

[13] D. Nielsen, G. Watson (2008). The response of epibenthic rotifers and microcrustacean communities to flow manipulations in lowland rivers, Hydrobiologia, Vol. 603, p.117–128.

DOI: 10.1007/s10750-007-9251-6

[14] C. Ricci (1987) Ecology of bdelloids: How to be successful. Hydrobiologia, Vol. 147, p.117–127.

DOI: 10.1007/bf00025734

[15] S. Rozhko-Rozhkevich (1937).

[16] V. Yakovenko (2009) Zooplankton of the Dnieper reservoir under conditions of anthropogenic pressure : Abstract of Cand. Sci. (Biol. ) Dissertation, Kiev.

[17] V. Zhadin (1960). Methods of hydroecological study, Higher School, Moscow.

[18] V. Zhukinskyy (2006). Methods of complex ecological estimation of surface water bodies quality, in Methods of of surface waterbodies hydroecological studies, edited by. V. D Romanenko, Кiev, p.379 – 401.

Show More Hide