Subscribe

Subscribe to our Newsletter and get informed about new publication regulary and special discounts for subscribers!

ILNS > Volume 50 > Should I Stay or should I Go? Determinants of...
Should I Stay or should I Go? Determinants of Evacuation upon Flood Warning among Households in a Flood Prone Area in Bukidnon, Philippines
< Back to Volume

Should I Stay or should I Go? Determinants of Evacuation upon Flood Warning among Households in a Flood Prone Area in Bukidnon, Philippines

Full Text PDF

Abstract:

To identify factors that influence the decision to evacuate upon flood warning by authorities, a study was conducted in a flood prone area in the province of Bukidnon in the Philippines. A survey of flood victims was conducted in Batangan Village, Valencia City, Bukidnon, Philippines wherein 150 respondents were interviewed. Logistic regression analysis was done to test the socio demographic factors that could influence a family’s decision to either evacuate or stay upon advice by government authorities. College education, presence of children in the home, poverty, and extent of flood experienced were found to significantly influence the decision of the family to evacuate. Based on this information, the study provides recommendations for disaster managers in case of future flood incidence in the area.

Info:

Periodical:
International Letters of Natural Sciences (Volume 50)
Pages:
70-75
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18052/www.scipress.com/ILNS.50.70
Citation:
M. A. P. Medina and J. M. Moraca, "Should I Stay or should I Go? Determinants of Evacuation upon Flood Warning among Households in a Flood Prone Area in Bukidnon, Philippines", International Letters of Natural Sciences, Vol. 50, pp. 70-75, 2016
Online since:
January 2016
Authors:
Michael Arieh P. Medina, Jackielyn M. Moraca
Keywords:
Disaster Risk Reduction, Flood Evacuation, Logistic Regression, Philippines
Export:
RIS, BibTeX, Text
Distribution:
Open Access

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License

References:

[1] G. Bankoff. 2003. Constructing Vulnerability: The Historical, Natural and Social Generation of Flooding in Metropolitan Manila. Disasters. 27(3): 95-109.

[2] L. Hsieh, M. Hsu, M. Li. 2006. An Assessment of Structural Measures for Flood-prone Lowlands with High Population Density along the Keelung River in Taiwan. Natural Hazards. 37: 133-152.

[3] E.L. Kick, J.C. Fraser, G.M. Fulkerson, L.A. McKinney, D.H. De Vries. 2011. Repetitive flood victims and acceptance of FEMA mitigation offers: an analysis with community–system policy implications. Disasters. 35(3): 510-539.

[4] Z.W. Kundzewicz, K. Takeuchi. 1999. Flood protection and management: quo vadimus? Hydrological Sciences Journal. 44(3): 417-432.

[5] R.W. Perry. 1979. Evacuation Decision-Making in Natural Disasters. Mass Emergencies. 4: 25-38.

[6] N. Dash, H. Gladwin. 2007. Evacuation Decision Making and Behavioral Responses: Individual and Household. Natural Hazards Review. 8(3): 69-77.

[7] M.A.P. Medina, J.G. Arche. 2015. The value of flood risk reduction in selected communities near the Pulangui river in Bukidnon, Philippines. Journal of Biodiversity and Environmental Sciences. 6(3): 84-90.

[8] D. Solis, M. Thomas, D. Letson. 2010. An empirical evaluation of the determinants of household hurricane evacuation choice. Journal of Development and Agricultural Economics. 2(3): 188-196.

[9] S.E. Heath, P.H. Kass, A.M. Beck, L.T. Glickman. 2001. Human and pet-related risk factors for household evacuation failure during a natural disaster. American Journal of Epidemiology. 153(7): 659-665.

[10] J.C. Whitehead, B. Edwards, M.V. Willigen, J.R. Maiolo, K. Wilson, K.T. Smith. 2000. Heading for higher ground: factors affecting real and hypothetical hurricane evacuation behavior. Environmental Hazards. 2: 133-142.

[11] E.J. Baker. 1991. Hurricane evacuation behavior. International Journal of Mass Emergencies and Disasters. 9(2): 287-310.

[12] K. Dow, S.L. Cutter. 1998. Crying wolf: Repeat responses to hurricane evacuation orders. Coastal Management. 26(4): 237-252.

Show More Hide