Subscribe to our Newsletter and get informed about new publication regulary and special discounts for subscribers!

ILNS > Volume 50 > An Attitude of Subcarpathian’s Residents to...
< Back to Volume

An Attitude of Subcarpathian’s Residents to Sustainable Solutions for Urban Transport

Full Text PDF


Sustainable development is a concept that appears more frequently in the context of urbanized cities. Rational management of city logistics and urban population change of consciousness becomes a priority. The purpose of this publication is to emphasize the need for changes in city logistics, to characterize the concept of sustainable transport and to present the results of research on: the views of residents of Podkarpacie on choosing alternatives to the car, and urban transport concept. The research process was conducted in two stages. The first stage of the research was conducted in 2014 within its scope included the study compared the inhabitants of Podkarpacie to sustainable forms of transport. The second stage of the study carried out in 2015 was designed to examine whether the implementation of Intelligent Public Transport Management System, has changed the ratio of respondents to sustainable transport.


International Letters of Natural Sciences (Volume 50)
D. Zimon "An Attitude of Subcarpathian’s Residents to Sustainable Solutions for Urban Transport", International Letters of Natural Sciences, Vol. 50, pp. 41-52, 2016
Online since:
Jan 2016

[1] Grema, L. U., Abubakar, A. B., & Obiukwu, O. O. (2013). Carbon emission control measures. International Letters of Natural Sciences Vol. 3 (2013) pp.21-27.

[2] Rao, C., Goh, M., Zhao, Y., & Zheng, J. (2015). Location selection of city logistics centers under sustainability. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 36, 29-44.

[3] Dasaklis TK, Pappis CP. Supply chain management in view of climate change: an overview of possible impacts and the road ahead. Journal of Industrial Engineering and Management. 2013; 6(4): 1139-1161.

[4] Pawłowski A. The sustainable development revolution. Problems of sustainable development. 2009; 4(1): 65-76.

[5] Zairi M. Beyond TQM implementation: the new paradigm of TQM sustainability, Total Quality Management, 2002; 13(8): 1161-1172.

[6] Gonzalez-Feliu, J., & Morana, J. (2014).

[7] Morana, J. (2013). Sustainable supply chain management. IST Wiley.

[8] Anderson, S., Allen, J., & Browne, M. (2005). Urban logistics–how can it meet policy makers' sustainability objectives?. Journal of Transport Geography, 13(1), 71-81.

[9] Lindholm, M. (2013),  Urban  freight transport  from  a local  authority  perspective – a literature review, EuropeanTransport , Vol. 54 (3), pp.1-37.

[10] Mutingi, M. Developing green supply chain management strategies: A taxonomic approach. Journal of Industrial Engineering and Management. 2013; 6(2): 525-546.

[11] Banister, D. (2008). The sustainable mobility paradigm. Transport Policy, 15(2), 73–80.

[12] Page, M. (2005). Non-motorized transportation policy. Handbooks in transport (p.6).

[13] Rajovic, G., & Bulatovic, J. (2015). State of environmental awareness in northeastern Montenegro: a review, International Letters of Natural Sciences Vol. 29 (2015) pp.43-56.

[14] Molecki B, Morel O. Uwarunkowania ruchowe organizacji przesiadek w transporcie zbiorowym. Transport Miejski, 2003; 12: 26-33.

[15] Li ZC, Lam WH, Wong SC, Zhu DL, Huang HJ. Modeling park-and-ride services in a multimodal transport network with elastic demand. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board. 1994; 1: 101-109.

[16] Meek S, Ison S, Enoch M. Role of Bus‐Based Park and Ride in the UK: A Temporal and Evaluative Review. Transport Reviews. 2008; 28(6): 781-803.

[17] Szymczak M. Logistyka miejska. Poznań: Wydawnictwo Akademii Ekonomicznej w Poznaniu; (2008).

[18] Maes, J., & Vanelslander, T. (2012). The use of bicycle messengers in the logistics chain, concepts further revised. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 39, 409-423.

[19] Martens K. Promoting bike-and-ride: The Dutch experience. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice. 2007; 41(4): 326-338.

[20] Correia G, Viegas JM. Carpooling and carpool clubs: Clarifying concepts and assessing value enhancement possibilities through a Stated Preference web survey in Lisbon, Portugal. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice. 2011; 45(2): 81-90.

[21] Szołtysek J. Car-pooling w koncepcji podróży pasażerskiej w miastach. Logistyka, 2008; 4: 45-48.

[22] Watson, M. (2012). How theories of practice can inform transition to a decarbonised transport system. Journal of Transport Geography, 24, 488–496.

[23] Mrkajić, V., & Anguelovski, I. (2016). Planning for sustainable mobility in transition cities: Cycling losses and hopes of revival in Novi Sad, Serbia. Cities, 52, 66-78.

[24] Dell'Olio L, Ibeas A, Cecin P. The quality of services desired by public transport users. Transport Policy 2001; 18(1): 217-227.

[25] Radnović B, Radenko MM, Radnović V, Ilić M, Lukač D. Marketing Research on Passenger Satisfaction With Public Transport Service in the City of Belgrade. Promet - Traffic & Transportation. 2015; 27(1): 47-57.

[26] Gajewska T, Grigoroudis E. Importance of logistics services attributes influencing customer satisfaction. Paper presented at: Advanced Logistics and Transport (ICALT) 4th International Conference on. IEEE; 2015 may 20-22; Valenciennes, France.

Show More Hide