Subscribe to our Newsletter and get informed about new publication regulary and special discounts for subscribers!

ILNS > ILNS Volume 44 > Phytoremediation of Quizlofop-Ethyl Contaminated...
< Back to Volume

Phytoremediation of Quizlofop-Ethyl Contaminated Soil Using Sesbania sesabn L

Full Text PDF


In this field experiments, sandy loam soil was treated with different concentration of herbicide (Quizalofop-ethyl) 0.5, 1.0, 1.5 and 2 per cent. Sesbania sesban L. seeds were sown in all treated soil. The germination percentage, morphological and enzymes activities were measured after 20, 40 and 120 days. The results indicate that the germination per cent, morphological parameters were increased in control then it was gradually decreased with increasing the herbicide concentration. The enzymes like catalase and peroxidase activity were increased in control then it was decreased with increasing the concentration. Whereas the polyphenoloxidase acticity was lower in control and it was increased with increasing the herbicides concentration. Hence, after 120 days plants were harvested and the plant powder was analyzed for absorption of herbicide by plant with the help of Gas chromatography mass spectrum (GCMS). The obtained data showed that herbicide absorption was concerned in quiazalofop-ethyl treated plant when compared to control. This study expose that herbicide reduced by Sesbania sesban L.


International Letters of Natural Sciences (Volume 44)
T. Mahakavi et al., "Phytoremediation of Quizlofop-Ethyl Contaminated Soil Using Sesbania sesabn L", International Letters of Natural Sciences, Vol. 44, pp. 59-63, 2015
Online since:
July 2015

[1] Machly, A.C. and Chance V, 1967. Methods of biochemical analysis. In: Glick D. (Ed. ) Inter-Science Publishers, Inc., New York, pp.357-824.

[2] Kumar K. B and Khan P. A, 1982. Peroxidase and polyphenol oxidase in excised ragi Eleusine coracana (V. PR 202) leaves during senescence. Ind. J. Exp. Bot., 20: 412-416.


[3] Korade DL and Fulekar MH., 2009. Biology and Medicine, 1 (1): 28-34.

[4] Rai S, P Trivedi, A. K Singh, Ritul kamal, Mohd. Haris Siddiqui, Sarika Malik and L P Srivastava., 2014. IJAR, 2(10) 489-497.

[5] Chahid K, Laglaoui A, Zentar S, Ennabili A, 2013. American.J. Envi. Prot, 2(6): 149-153.

[6] Santhoshkumar M, Baskaran L, Mahakavi T and Ravi mycin T, 2015. J. Environ. Treat. Tech, 3(1): 25-27.

[7] Mahakavi, Bakiyaraj R, Baskaran L, Nusrat Rashid, Sankar Ganesh K, 2014. Int.L. Natural Sci. 4: 58-65.

[8] Sammaiah D, Chandra Shekar CH, Ramkrishna Prasad V and Jaganmohan Reddy K, 2011. Int.J. Pharma. and Bio. Sci, 2(1): 374-384.

[9] Mishra I. P, Sabat G, and Mohanty B. K, 2014. I.J.A.B. R, 4(3): 265-270.

[10] Kengar Y. D, Kamble A. B and Sabale A. B, 2014. Ann. Biol. Rese, 5 (5): 89-92.

[11] Chauhan S. S, Agrawal S and Srivastava A, 2013. Asian.J. Pharm. Clin. Res, 6(3): 114-117.

[12] Salt DE, Smith RD, Raskin I, 1998. Phytoremediation. Annu Rev Plant Physiol Plant Mol Biol 49: 643-668.


[13] Dietz A. C and Schnoor J. L, 2001. Advances in phytoremediation. Environ. Health Perspect. 109, 163–168.

[14] Doty, S.L. 2007. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 104, 16816–16821.

Show More Hide
Cited By:
This article has no citations.