Subscribe

Subscribe to our Newsletter and get informed about new publication regulary and special discounts for subscribers!

ILNS > Volume 42 > Assessing Avian Richness and Diversity in...
< Back to Volume

Assessing Avian Richness and Diversity in Different Regions of Oil Palm Plantation in Selangor, Malaysia

Full Text PDF

Abstract:

Malaysia is characterized by a variety of habitats such as forests, clearings, thickets, and cropland that attract various species of birds. This study examined the bird community in terms of richness and diversity at oil palm plantations habitat. The abundance of birds was determined by using distance sampling point count method. A total of 2722 birds belonging to 38 families representing 86 species of birds were detected. Diversity analysis indicates that the species of birds in the oil palm plantation at Sungai Pelek is more diverse (Shannon-Wiener Diversity Index H; 3.52) and richness (Margalef’s Richness Index R1; 10.2) than oil palm plantation in Teluk Panglima Garang-Pulau Carey and Banting-Jenjarum. However, the species of birds in the oil palm plantations at Teluk Panglima Garang-Pulau Carey and Banting-Jenjarum show higher evenness (Pielou’s Evenness Index E; 0.82) compared with oil palm plantations in Sungai Pelek. The results of this study indicate that the species composition and distribution of the avian species in the oil palm plantations are affected by habitat characterization of that particular area and its vicinity.

Info:

Periodical:
International Letters of Natural Sciences (Volume 42)
Pages:
28-37
Citation:
A. Amir et al., "Assessing Avian Richness and Diversity in Different Regions of Oil Palm Plantation in Selangor, Malaysia", International Letters of Natural Sciences, Vol. 42, pp. 28-37, 2015
Online since:
July 2015
Export:
Distribution:
References:

[1] Rajpar, M.N. and M. Zakaria. 2011. Bird species abundance and their correlationship with microclimate and habitat variables at natural wetland reserve, Peninsular Malaysia. International J. Zoology, Article ID 758573, 17 pages.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1155/2011/758573

[2] Malaysian Nature Society. 2010. Checklist of the Malaysian birds with information about occurrence and status. URL: http: /www. birdingmalaysia. com/lists. php. Retrieved on 23rd April (2015).

[3] Koh, L.P. and Wilcove, D. S. 2009. Oil palm: disinformation enables deforestation. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 24: 67-68.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2008.09.006

[4] Koh, L.P. and Wilcove, D.S. 2008. Is oil palm agriculture really destroying tropical biodiversity? Conservation Letters 1: 60-64.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1755-263x.2008.00011.x

[5] Peh, K.S.H., Sodhi, N.S., Jong, J.D., Sekercioglu, C.H., Yap, C.A.M. and Lim, S.L.H. 2006. Conservation value of degraded habitats for forest birds in Southern Peninsular Malaysia. Diversity and Distribution 12: 572-581.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1366-9516.2006.00257.x

[6] White, J. G, Antos, M.J., Fitzsimons, J. A, Palmer, G.C. 2005. Non-uniform bird assemblages in urban environments: the influence of streetscape vegetation. Landscape and Urban Planning, 71: 123-135.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2004.02.006

[7] Shahabuddin, G., Kumar, R. 2007. Effects of extractive disturbance on bird assemblages, vegetation structure and floristics in tropical scrub forest, Sariska Tiger Reserve, India. Forest Ecology and Management. 246 (2-3): 175-185.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2007.03.061

[8] Tabarelli, M., Aguiar, A.V., Ribeiro, M.C., Metzger, J.P., Peres, C.A. 2010. Prospects for biodiversity conservation in the Atlantic Forest: Lessons from aging human-modified landscapes. Biological Conservation 143: 2328-2340.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2010.02.005

[9] Kukreti, M. and Bhatt, D. 2014. Birds of Lansdowne forest division and adjacent suburban landscapes, Garhwal Himalayas, Uttarakhand, India: community structure and seasonal distribution. Biodiversitas 15: 80-88.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.13057/biodiv/d150112

[10] World Bank Report. 2013. Bird species; threatened in Malaysia. Retrieved on 13th April 2015 at URL: http: /ieconomics. com/bird-species-threatened-in-malaysia.

[11] Yaap, B., Struebig, M., Paoli, G. and Koh, L. 2010. Mitigating the biodiversity impacts of oil palm development. CAB Reviewers: Perspectives in Agriculture, Veterinary Science, Nutrition and Natural Resources 5: 1-11.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1079/pavsnnr20105019

[12] RSPO. 2013. RSPO Principles and Criteria for Sustainable Palm Oil Production. 70 pp. www. rspo. org/file/PnC_RSPO_Rev1. pdf. Accesssed on 27th March (2015).

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-9818936-9-3.50027-7

[13] Azhar, B., Lindenmayer, D.B., Wood, J., Fischer, J., Manning, A., McElhinny, C. and Zakaria, M. 2011. The conservation value of oil palm plantation estates, small holdings and logged peat swamp forest for birds. Forest Ecology and Management 262: 2306-2315.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2011.08.026

[14] Edwards, D.P., Hodgson, J.A., Hamer, K.C., Mitchell, S.L., Ahmad, A.H., Cornell, S.J. and Wilcove, D.S. 2010. Wildlife-friendly oil palm plantations fail to protect biodiversity effectively. Conservation Letters 3: 236-242.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1755-263x.2010.00107.x

[15] Peh, K.S.H., de Jong, J., Navjot, S.S., Susan, L.H.L., Charlotte, A.M.Y. 2005. Lowland rainforest avifauna and human disturbance: Persistence of primary forest birds in selectively logged forests and mixed-rura; habitats of southern Peninsular Malaysia. Biological Conservation, Elsevier.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2005.01.010

[16] Rajpar, M.N., and Zakaria, M. 2010. Density and diversity of water birds and terrestrial birds at Paya Indah Wetland Reserve, Selangor, Peninsular Malaysia. Journal of Biological Science. Vol. 10, ed. 7, pp.658-666.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3923/jbs.2010.658.666

[17] Kwok, H.K., Corlett, R.T. 2000. The bird community of a natural secondary forest and a Lophostemon confertus plantation in Hong Kong, South China. Forest Ecology and Management. Vol. 130, pp.227-234.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/s0378-1127(99)00178-4

[18] Scharringa, J. 2005. CD-ROM of birds of tropical Asia 3. Bird Song International. Netherland. (2005).

[19] Soderstrom, B. and T. Part. 2000. Influence of landscape scale on farmland birds in semi-natural pastures. Conser. Biol., 14: 522-533.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1523-1739.2000.98564.x

[20] Cintra, R. and L.N. Naka. 2012. Spatial variation in bird community composition in relation to topographic gradient and forest heterogeneity in a Central Amazonian Rainforest. Intl. J. Ecology.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/435671

[21] Johnson, M.D. and T.W. Sherry. 2001. Effects of food availability on the distribution of migratory warblers among habitats in Jamaica. J. Anim, Ecol., 70: 546-560.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2656.2001.00522.x

[22] Moegenburg, S.M. and D.J. Levey. 2003. Do frugivore respond to fruit harvest? An experimental study of short-term response. Ecology, 84: 2600-2612.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1890/02-0063

[23] Campbell, S.P., J.W. Witham and M.L. Hunter Jr., 2007. Long-term effects of group selection timber harbesting on abundance of forest birds. Conserv. Biol., 21: 1218-1229.

[24] DeGraaf, R.M. and M. Yamasaki. 2003. Options for managing early successional forest and shrubland bird habitats in the north-eastern United States. Forest Ecol. Manage., 185: 179-191.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/s0378-1127(03)00254-8

[25] Renton, K. 2001. Lilac-crowned Parrot diet and food resource availability: Resource tracking by a parrot seed predator. Condor, 103: 62-69.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1650/0010-5422(2001)103[0062:lcpdaf]2.0.co;2

[26] Doyon, F., D. Gagnon and J.F. Giroux. 2005. Effects of strip and single tree selection cutting on birds and their habitat in a South-Western Quebec Northern Hardwood forest. Forest Ecol. Manag., 209: 101-115.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2005.01.005

[27] McShea, W.J. and J.H. Rappole. 2000. Managing the abundance and diversity of breeding bird populations through manipulation of deer populations. Conserv. Biol., 14: 1161-1170.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1523-1739.2000.99210.x

[28] King, D.I. and R.M. Degraff. 2004. Effects of group selection opening size on the distribution and reproductive success of an early-successional shrubland birds. Forest Ecol. Manage., 190: 179-185.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2003.10.012

[29] Lemelin, L.V., L. Imbeau, M. Darveau, and D. Bordage. 2007. Local, short-term effects of forest harvesting on breeding waterfowl and Common Loon in forest-dominant landscapes of Quebec. Avian Conserv. Ecol. 2: p.10.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.5751/ace-00191-020210

[30] IUCN 2014. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. Version 2014. 3.

Show More Hide
Cited By:
This article has no citations.