Subscribe

Subscribe to our Newsletter and get informed about new publication regulary and special discounts for subscribers!

ILNS > Volume 24 > Ethnoveterinary Practices in Villupuram District,...
< Back to Volume

Ethnoveterinary Practices in Villupuram District, Tamil Nadu, India

Full Text PDF

Abstract:

Ayurvedic medicines are considered to be the best systems of treatment in India and this system is spreading now globally. Natural products are also a part of our everyday life. Ethno veterinary medicine is developed by farmers in field and barns rather than and in scientific laboratories. It is less systematic, less formalized and usually transferred by word of mouth rather than writing. An ethnobotanical survey was conducted in 10 selected sites of Villupuram district. Twenty six plant species belonging to fourteen families were documented in the present study, to cure different diseases in animals. Interviews and detailed personal discussions were conducted with the traditional healers and local people to identify the plants and their medicinal information for six months. The study revealed that the different parts of these plants were used for treatment of different diseases. Leaves are the mostly used part to prepare medicine

Info:

Periodical:
International Letters of Natural Sciences (Volume 24)
Pages:
1-7
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18052/www.scipress.com/ILNS.24.1
Citation:
S. Dhanam and B. Elayaraj, "Ethnoveterinary Practices in Villupuram District, Tamil Nadu, India", International Letters of Natural Sciences, Vol. 24, pp. 1-7, 2014
Online since:
Aug 2014
Authors:
S. Dhanam, B. Elayaraj
Keywords:
Ayurvedic Medicine, Ethnoveterinary, Traditional Knowledge, Villupuram District
Export:
RIS, BibTeX, Text
Distribution:
Open Access

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License

References:

Balakrishnan V., J. Philip Robinson, A. Manickasamy, K. C. Ravindran, Global Journal of Pharmacology 3(1) (2009) 15-23.

Bharati Kumar, Avinash Bharati and B. L. Sharma. The Indian forester 135(5) (2009) 691-696.

Bhatt A., P. Singh, V. Kumarm M. Baunthiyal. Journal of Environ. Nanotechnol. 2 (2013) 22-29.

Das A., H. Tag. Indian Journal of Traditional Knowledge 5(3) (2006) 317-322.

Dubey N. K., R. Kumar, P. Tripati. Current Science 86(1) (2004) 37-41bhatt.

Gamble J. S., Flora of the presidency of Madras, Botanical Survey of India, Calcutta. (1967).

Ganesan S., M. Chandhirasekaran, A. Selvaraj, Indian Journal of Traditional Knowledge 7 (2008) 347-354.

Kiruba S., S. Jeeva and S. S. M. Dhas, Indian Journal of Traditional Knowledge 5 (2006) 575-578.

Nag A., P. Galav, S. S. Katewa, Indian Journal of Traditional Knowledge 6 (2007) 583-588.

Pei., Pharma Bio. 39 (2001) 74-79.

Saikia B., S. K. Borthakur, Indian Journal of Traditional Knowledge 9 (2010) 49-51.

Sanyasi Rao M. L., Y. N. R. Varma Vijayakumar, Ethnobotanical Leaflets 12 (2008) 217-226.

Tiwari L., P. C. Pande, Indian Journal of Traditional Knowledge 9 (2010) 611-617.

Udhyan P. S., Sateesh George, K. V. Thushar, Indira Balachandran, Indian Journal of Traditional Knowledge 4(4) (2005) 437-442.

S. Dhanam, International Letters of Natural Sciences 11(2) (2014) 197-208.

S. Dhanam, B. Elayaraj, International Letters of Natural Sciences 14 (2014) 1-10.

Musharaf Khan, Abdurehman, Farrukh Hussain, Zabta Khan Shinwari, Shahana Musharaf, International Letters of Natural Sciences 15(2) (2014) 190-197. ( Received 12 August 2014; accepted 20 August 2014 ).

Show More Hide