Paper Titles in Periodical
International Letters of Natural Sciences
ILNS Volume 17

Subscribe to our Newsletter and get informed about new publication regulary and special discounts for subscribers!

ILNS > ILNS Volume 17 > Induced Physical Mutagenesis and its Effect in...
< Back to Volume

Induced Physical Mutagenesis and its Effect in Cytological Behavior of Ashwagandha (Withania somnifera (L.) Dunal)

Full Text PDF


The mitotic effect of physical mutagen gamma rays was observed in the root tip cells of Ashwagandha. The Chromosome analysis has been showed as an important tool for establish variability of the plant seed by use of physical mutagen gamma rays. The gamma rays have of low wavelength and high penetrable power. The plant has tremendous medicinal values and it is known from ancient times. The dry and well matured seeds of ashwagandha were irradiated with different doses of gamma rays viz., 5, 10, 15, 20, 25, 30, 35, 40, 45 and 50 KR respectively. The chromosome number of control plant is 2n = 48. The gamma rays affect the normal cytological behavior of ashwagandha species. The chromosomal aberrations increase with increase in the doses of gamma rays to optimum level of 30KR, because it causes changes in the chromosome structure, cellular structure and metabolism of plants. The chromosome aberration like, Sticky metaphase, Precocious moment chromosome, Fragments, Anaphasic bridge, Anaphasic laggard, Telophasic laggard. The present investigation was carried out to study the cytogenetic analysis of the species Withania somnifera. The chromosomal aberration increases with increase in the doses to optimum level (50 KR) of physical mutagen gamma rays.


International Letters of Natural Sciences (Volume 17)
T. Bharathi et al., "Induced Physical Mutagenesis and its Effect in Cytological Behavior of Ashwagandha (Withania somnifera (L.) Dunal)", International Letters of Natural Sciences, Vol. 17, pp. 152-161, 2014
Online since:
June 2014

Agarwal R., Ansari M. Y. K., J. Cytol. Genet. 2 (2001) 129-134.

Ahmed S., Yasmin R., Cytologia 57 (1992) 155-160.

Bandyopadhyay B., Bose S., 48 (1983) 13-19.

Baquar S.R., S. Akhtar, A. Hussain, Botaniska Notiser 118 (1965) 289-298.

Bhandari M.M. (1990). Flora of the Indian Desert, Scientific publishers, Jodhpur.

Bharathi T., Gnanamurthy S., Dhanavel D., International Journal of Advanced Research 1(5) (2013) 136-141.

Bipasa C., Shella S., Mutat. res. 283 (1992) 287-294.

Bir S., M. Sidhu (1980). Cytological Observations on Weed Flora of Patiala District, Punjab, " In: S.S. Bir, Eds., Recent Researches in plant science; Kalyani publishers, Ludhiana, 261-271.

Blinks L. R., J. cellcomp. Physiol. 39 (1952) 11.

Cequea H., Cequea D., Imery J., Nirichio M., Cytologia 68 (2003) 329-333.

Chatha G. S., S. S. Bir, Plant sciences. 9 (1998) 199-256.

Chevallier A. (1996). The Encyclopedia of Medicinal plants, Dorling Kindersley, London.

Chidambaram A., Sundaramoorthy P., Murugan A., Sankar Ganesh K., Baskaran L., Iran J. Environ. Health Sci. Eng. 6 (1) (2008) 17-22.

Das A., Datta A. K, Ghose S., J Trop Med Plants 10 (2009) 249-256.

Das A., Datta A. K., Ghose S., Bhattacharyya A., J. Trop. Med. Pl. 10 (2009) 225-230.

Dhamayanthi K. P. M., Reddy V. R. K., Cytologia 65 (2000) 129-133.

Dhanavel D., S. Gnanamurthy, M. Girija., Int. J. Curr. Sci. (2012) 245-250.

Elangovan M., Selvaraj R., 25-26th, Feb, 1995. In: proc. symp. On Frontiers in Biodiversity, Madras, India, Abstract No. 16.

Gunkel J. E., Sparrow A. H., Brookhaven Symp. Biol. 6 (1954) 252-277.

Gupta A. P., Verma R. K., Misra H. O., Gupta M. M., J. Medi. Aro. Plant Sci. 18 (1996) 788-790.

Iqbal M., Datta A. K., J. Trop. Med. Pl. 8 (2007) 47-53.

Iqbal M., Datta A. K., Cytologia 72 (2007) 43-47.

Kaul K. N. (1957).

Khan Z., Gupta H, Ansari M. Y. K., Choudry S., Biol and Med. 1(2) (2009) 66-69.

Kothari S. K., Singh C. P., Vijay K. Y., Singh K., J. Hortic. Sci. Biotechnol. 78 (2003) 422-425.

Kumar A., B. A., Mir D, Sehgal T. H. Dar, S. Koul, M. K. Kaul, S. N. Raina, G. N. Qazi., Plant systematics and Evolution 291(3-4) (2011) 141-151.

Kumar G., Gupta P., Turk. J. Biol. 33 (2009) 123-128.

Kumar G., Singh V., J. Ind. Bot. Soc. 82 (2003) 19-22.

Miege J., Ann Fac Sci Univ Dakar 5 (1960) 75-85.

Mir B. A., S. Loul A. Kumar M. K. Kaul, A. S. Soodan, S. N. Raina, Indian Journal of Biotecnolog 9 (2010) 325-328.

Mohan Ram H. Y., I. Kamini, Phytomorphology 14 (1964) 574-587.

Pavadai P., S. Gnanamurthy, D. Dhanavel, International Journal of Advanced Research 1(7) (2013) 223-228.

Sharma V., Kumar G., Cytologia 69(3) (2004) 243-248.

Shroni K., Bodele., Wall. Ex. Nees. 3(6) (2013) 55-57.

Singh B. B., Rad Bot 14 (1974) 195-199.

Singh G R., Sareen P. K., Sharan R. P., J. Cytol. Genet. 34 (1999) 21-23.

Utsunomiya K. S., Bione N. C. P., Pagliarini M. S., Cytologia 67 (2002) 169-176.

Woodstock and Justics, Rad. Bot. 7 (1967) 129-136. ( Received 18 June 2014; accepted 26 June 2014 ).

Show More Hide
Cited By:

[1] M. Siahpoosh, S. Nasrollahi, R. Sekhavat, "Effects of Gamma Radiation on Mitosis and Meiosis Anomalies and Agronomic Features in M2 Plants of Vicia faba cv. Saraziri", CYTOLOGIA, Vol. 85, p. 135, 2020


[2] A. Daphedar, S. Kakkalameli, G. Melappa, T. Taranath, C. Srinivasa, C. Shivamallu, A. Syed, N. Marraiki, A. Elgorban, R. Veerapur, S. Patil, S. Kollur, "Genotoxic assay of silver and zinc oxide nanoparticles synthesized by leaf extract of Garcinia livingstonei T. Anderson: A comparative study", Pharmacognosy Magazine, Vol. 17, p. 114, 2021