Assessment of Flower Visiting Insects Diversity as Pollinators in Two Parks, Kolkata, India

Chowdhury, Suchisuvra; Sarkar, Subhodeep; Nandy, Abantika; Talapatra, Soumendra Nath

doi:10.18052/www.scipress.com/ILNS.15.58

ILNS > Volume 15 > Assessment of Flower Visiting Insects Diversity as...

< Back to Volume

Assessment of Flower Visiting Insects Diversity as Pollinators in Two Parks, Kolkata, India

Full Text PDF

Abstract:

Insects are depends upon autotrophs and they attract by the flowers colour and shape as pollinator. This is a mutual relationship between flowers and insects. The present study aims to determine flower visiting insect diversity as pollinators in two parks as biomonitoring of automobile air pollution exposure, landscape changes and/or human interactions. The study areas were selected as per heavily-populated neighborhoods, nearby office buildings, nearby roads and continuous vehicular movements, human interactions as visitors, where fences and high levels of human disturbance are common. The study was carried out at 2 sampling stations viz (i) Elliot park and (ii) Agri-Horticulture Society. The flower species were selected viz. Helianthus annuus, Petunia sp. and Buganvilia spectabilis planting above mentioned areas because these species are more common among other species. In each flower, diversity of visiting insects were studied by qualitative and quantitative assessment. Indices were Species richness, Index of Dominance, Relative abundance, Shannon-Wiener Diversity Index and Evenness Index for insects for all selected sites were calculated using the statistical formulae. The present results clearly indicate that the flower visiting insects are very less in numbers on three flowering species and index values were decreased. This study is a preliminary assessment of flower visiting insects diversity but further researches are needed in relation to pollination efficiencies of flower visiting insects and biochemical and genetic damage study of flowers as well as air pollution load by using instruments. It was concluded that three flowering species viz. sunflower, petunia and bougainvillea are very common both the parks but insect visitors are common but present less in number, which may be due to the vehicular pollution and/or human interference and/or landscape changes due to nearby neighborhood blocks, office and residential buildings etc.

Info:

Periodical:

International Letters of Natural Sciences (Volume 15)

Pages:

58-68

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18052/www.scipress.com/ILNS.15.58

Citation:

S. Chowdhury et al., "Assessment of Flower Visiting Insects Diversity as Pollinators in Two Parks, Kolkata, India", International Letters of Natural Sciences, Vol. 15, pp. 58-68, 2014

Online since:

May 2014

Authors:

Suchisuvra Chowdhury, Subhodeep Sarkar, Abantika Nandy, Soumendra Nath Talapatra

Keywords:

Biomonitoring, Diversity Index, Flower Visiting Insects, Insect Diversity, Pollination Effects

Export:

RIS, BibTeX, Text

Distribution:

Open Access

This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License

References:

Berenbaum M. R., Bugs in the System: Insects and their Impact on Human Affairs (1995) 377 pp., Addision - Weslay.

Blande J. D., Holopainen J. K., Li T., Ecology Letters 13 (2010) 1172-1181.

Cane, J.H., Bees' needs challenged by urbanization. - In: Johnson, E. A. and Klemens, M. W. (eds), Nature in fragments: the legacy of sprawl. Columbia Univ. Press, (2005) pp.109-124.

Citizen's Report, Centre of Science and Environment (2011) 1-106.

Comba L., Sarah A. Corbet S., Barron A., Bird A., Collinge S. Miyazak N., Powell M., Annals Botany 83 (1999) 369-383.

CPCB, Central Pollution Control Board, New Delhi., (2009). http: /www. cpcb. nic. in /bulletin /del/2009html.

Docherty M., Salt D. T., Holopainen J. K., Forests and insects (eds. Watt, A.D., Stork, N.E., Hunter, M.D. ) London, Chapman and Hall, (1997) 229-247.

Hennig E. I., Ghazoul J., Perspectives in Plant Ecology, Evolution and Systematics 13 (2011) 137-150.

Hernandez J. L., et al., Cities Environ, http: /digitalcommons. lmu. edu/cgi/viewcontent cgi article 1036 (2009).

Holopainen J., Plant - Insect interactions and Pollution, Physiology and Maintenance, Vol. V, Encyclopedia of Life Support Systems (EOLSS).

Li M. H., Arch Environ Contam Toxicol. 45 (2003) 168-176.

Matsuki Y., Tateno R., Shibata M., Isagi Y., Am J Bot 95(8) (2008) 925-930.

Matteson K. C., Grace J. B., Minor E. S., Oikos 2012 01-13.

Musgrave E., Master's Thesis, San Jose State University, htp: /scholarworks. sjsu. edu/ etd_theses (2013) 1-95.

Pickett S. T. A., Cadenasso M. L., Journal of Ecology 96 (2008) 8-12.

Sattler S. E., Funnell-Harris D. L., Pedersen J. F., Food Chem. 58 (2010) 3611-3616.

Stiling P. D., Ecology: Theories and applications (3rd edition), (1999).

Trivedi S., Agrawal M., Rajput M., Indian J Air Poll Cont 3 (2003) 44-53.

Turner, W. R. et al., Bioscience 54 (2004) 585-590.

Warren, P. S. et al., Biol. Conserv. 141 (2008) 3-4.

Wojcik V. A., Journal of Pollination Ecology 4(7) (2011) 48-56.

Wojcik V. A., Journal of the Kansas Entomological Society 84(3) (2011) 197-208.

Yuan J. S., Himanen S., Holopainen J. K., Chen F., Stewart C. N. Jr., Trends in Ecology and Evolution 24 (2011) 323-331. ( Received 04 May 2014; accepted 11 May 2014 ).

Show More Hide

Cited By:

This article has no citations.