Subscribe

Subscribe to our Newsletter and get informed about new publication regulary and special discounts for subscribers!

ILCPA > Volume 68 > Comparison of 3DCRT Dose Distribution in...
< Back to Volume

Comparison of 3DCRT Dose Distribution in Radiotherapy for Lung Cancer Patient by Using AAA and PBC Algorithms

Full Text PDF

Abstract:

The Pencil Beam Convolution (PBC) algorithm in radiation treatment planning system is widely used to calculate the radiation dose distribution in radiotherapy planning. A new photon dose calculation algorithm known as Anisotropic Analytical Algorithm (AAA) by Varian Medical Systems is applied to investigate the difference of dose distribution by using AAA and PBC algorithms for the lung cancer with an inhomogeneity of its low density. In the present work, radiotherapy treatment planning of 10 lung cancer patients are designed with 6 MV photon beam using three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy (3DCRT) and dose distribution was calculated by the AAA and the PBC Algorithms. The dose distribution performance is evaluated by dose profile curve along transversal slice of PTV and Dose Volume Histogram (DVH) covered by the 95% isodose of PTV. The mean dose of organ at risks did not changed significantly but the volume of the PTV covered by the 95% isodose curve was decreased by 6% with inhomogeneity due to the algorithms. The dose distribution and the accuracy in calculating the absorbed dose of the AAA algorithm of the Varian Eclipse treatment planning system is analyzed and discussed.

Info:

Periodical:
International Letters of Chemistry, Physics and Astronomy (Volume 68)
Pages:
54-60
DOI:
10.18052/www.scipress.com/ILCPA.68.54
Citation:
M. M. Rana et al., "Comparison of 3DCRT Dose Distribution in Radiotherapy for Lung Cancer Patient by Using AAA and PBC Algorithms", International Letters of Chemistry, Physics and Astronomy, Vol. 68, pp. 54-60, 2016
Online since:
Jul 2016
Export:
Distribution:
References:

[1] M.S. Rahman, G.N. Kim et al., TLD postal dose quality audit intercomparison for megavolts photon beam of radiotherapy centers in Bangladesh, Jour. Nucl. Sci. Tech. Sup 5 (2008) 260-263.

DOI: 10.1080/00223131.2008.10875837

[2] B.J. Mijnheer, J.J. Battermann and A. Wambersie, What degree of accuracy is required and can be achieved in photon and neutron therapy?, Radio. Oncol. 8 (1987) 237–252.

DOI: 10.1016/s0167-8140(87)80247-5

[3] ICRU, Determination of absorbed dose in patient irradiated by means of X- or gamma rays in radiotherapy procedures, Report-24, Bethesda, MD: ICRU (1976).

[4] A. Brahme, J. Chavaudra, T. Landberg et al., Accuracy requirements and quality assurance of external beam therapy with photon and electron, Acta. Oncol. Sup. 1 (1988) 5-76.

[5] A. Brahme, Dosimetric precision requirements in radiation therapy, Acta. Radiol. Oncol. 23 (1984) 379-391.

[6] C.M. Bragg, J. Conway, Dosimetric verification of the Anisotropic Analytical Algorithm for radiotherapy treatment planning, Radio. Oncol. 81 (2006) 315-323.

DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2006.10.020

[7] P.M. R Storchi, L.J. Battum, E. Woudstra, Calculation of a pencil beam kernel from measured photon beam data, Phys. Med. Biol. 44 (1999) 2917–2928.

DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/44/12/305

[8] V. Panettieri, P. Barsoum, M. Westermark, AAA and PBC calculation accuracy in the surface build-up region tangential beam treatments. Phantoms and breast case study with the Monte Carlo code PENELOPE, Radiat. Oncol. 93 (2009) 94-101.

DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2009.05.010

[9] A. Bufacchi, B. Nardiello, R. Capparella, Clincal implications in the use of the PBC algorithm versus the AAA by comparison of different NTCP models/parameters, Radiat. Oncol. 8 164 (2013) 1-13.

DOI: 10.1186/1748-717x-8-164

[10] TDLF. Herman, K. Hibbitts, T. Herman, Evaluation of pencil beam convolution and anisotropic analytical algorithms in stereotactic lung irradiation, J. Medi. Phys. 36(4) (2011) 234-238.

DOI: 10.4103/0971-6203.89974

[11] P. Carrasco, N. Jornet, M. A. Duch et al. Comparison of dose calculation algorithms in phantom with lung equivalent heterogeneities under conditions of lateral disequilibrium, Med. Phys. 31 (2004) 2899-2911.

DOI: 10.1118/1.1788932

[12] E. Sterpin E, M. Tomasej, B. D. Smedt et al., Monte Carlo evaluation of the AAA treatment planning algorithm in a heterogeneous multilayer phantom and IMRT clinical treatments for an Elekta Sl25 Linear Accelerator, Med Phys 34 (2007) 1665–1677.

DOI: 10.1118/1.2727314

[13] W. Ulmer, D. Harder, A Triple Gaussian Pencil beam Model for Photon beam Treatment Planning, Z. Med. Phys. 5 (1995) 25-30.

DOI: 10.1016/s0939-3889(15)70758-0

[14] W. Ulmer, D. Harder, Applications of a triple Gaussian pencil beam model for photon beam treatment planning, Z. Med. Phys. 6 (1996) 68-74.

DOI: 10.1016/s0939-3889(15)70784-1

[15] W. Ulmer, W. Kaissl, The inverse problem of a Gaussian convolution and its application to the finite size of the measurement, Phys. Med. Biol. 48 (2003) 707–727.

DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/48/6/302
Show More Hide