Paper Titles in Periodical
International Letters of Chemistry, Physics and Astronomy
Volume 54


Subscribe to our Newsletter and get informed about new publication regulary and special discounts for subscribers!

ILCPA > Volume 54 > Technology-Enhanced Language Learning (TELL): A...
< Back to Volume

Technology-Enhanced Language Learning (TELL): A Review of Resourses and Upshots

Full Text PDF


The purpose of this paper is to investigate the effectiveness of using technology in improving learning in general and language learning in particular. To do this, a review of recent studies in technology-enhanced learning with a specific focus on technology-enhanced language learning (TELL) was conducted. It was revealed that using different kinds of technology can have positive impacts on students’ progress in different educational contexts in general. These benefits are multidimensional and comprehensive encompassing cognitive, metacognitive, and affective domains of learning. In the case of language learning, the same results were obtained. The findings showed that technology-based language instruction can be used effec­tively as teacher-delivered instruction. It was also indicated that technology can have a positive effect on language learning when its potential capacities are incorporated into pedagogy and curriculum. Besides, it was demonstrated that students’ listening, writing, speaking, and reading skills were enhanced and the technology was seen to have positive impact on sub-skills such as grammar and vocabulary learning. Problem solving as one of the most significant strategies in language learning was also improved. Generally speaking, utilizing technology in the EFL/ESL context provided enjoyable environment for students to learn English. These benefits and consequences are not restricted to any specific age and gender groups.


International Letters of Chemistry, Physics and Astronomy (Volume 54)
A. Ghanizadeh et al., "Technology-Enhanced Language Learning (TELL): A Review of Resourses and Upshots", International Letters of Chemistry, Physics and Astronomy, Vol. 54, pp. 73-87, 2015
Online since:
Jul 2015

[1] Abdallah Abu Naba'h, A. A., Hussain, J., Omari, A. A., & Shdeifat, S. (2009).

[2] AbuSeileek, A. F., &Rabab'ah, G. A. (2007). The effect of computer-based grammar instruction on the acquisition of verb tenses in an EFL context. The JALT CALL Journal, 3 (1), 59-80.

[3] Al-Seghayer, K. (2001). The effect of multimedia annotation modes on L2 vocabulary acquisition: A comparative study. Language Learning & Technology, 5 (1), 202-232. Retrieved from http: /llt. msu. edu/vol5num1/alseghayer/default. html.

[4] Attaran, M., Alias, N., &Siraj, S. (2012). Learning Culture in a Smart School: A Case Study. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 64, 417-423.

DOI: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.11.049

[5] Bacon, S., & Finnemann, M. (1990). A study of the attitudes, motives, and strategies of university foreign language students and their disposition to authentic oral and written input. The Modern Language Journal, 74, 459-473.

DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-4781.1990.tb05338.x

[6] Bahmani, R., Keshavarz, H., &Ghajari, H. (2013). The effect of smart schools on the social skills of students. Interdisciplinary Journal of Contemporary Research in Business, 5 (7), 151-159.

[7] Behzadi, M. H., &Manuchehri, M. (2013). Examining creativity of students through smart board in learning mathematics. Mathematics Education Trends and Research, 2013, 1-7.

DOI: 10.5899/2013/metr-00008

[8] Creswell, J. (1994). Research design: qualitative and quantitative approaches. London: Sage.

[9] Dlaska, A. (2002). Sites of construction: language learning, multimedia, and the international engineer. Computers & Education, 39, 129-143.

DOI: 10.1016/s0360-1315(02)00031-3

[10] Fallahkhair, S., Pemberton, L., & Griffiths, R. (2005).

[11] Ghorbani, S., &Marzban, A. (2013). The effect of CALL on Iranian beginner EFL learners' grammar learning. Journal of Academic and Applied Studies, 3 (7), 15-25.

[12] Glass, G. (1977). Integrating findings: The meta-analysis of research. Review of Research in Education, 5, 351-379.

[13] Hassanabadi, K. N., &Iranban, S. J. (2013). Proper and efficient teaching by implementing smart schools. Europian Online Journal of Natural and Social Sciences, 2 (3), 1684-(1988).

[14] Iravani, H., & Tajik, M. (2012). The effect of software-assisted grammar teaching on learning grammar of Iranian male junior high school learners. Journal of Language and Translation, 3 (1), 23-28.

[15] Jewitt, C. (2005). Multimodality, 'reading', and 'writing', for the 21st century. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 26 (3), 315-331.

DOI: 10.1080/01596300500200011

[16] Khiyabani, H., Ghonsooly, B., &Ghabanchi, Z. (2014). Using multimedia in teaching vocabulary in high school classes. Journal of Advances in English Language Teaching, 2 (1), 1-33.

[17] Kiliçkaya, F., &seferoğlu, G. (2013). The impact of CALL instruction on English language teachers' use of technology in language teaching . Journal of Second and Multiple Language Acquisition, 1 (1), 20-38.

[18] Hedges, L. V., & Olkin, I. (1985). Statistical methods for meta-analysis. Orlando: Academic Press.

[19] Kelm, O. R. (1998). The use of electronic mail in foreign language classes. In K. Arens (Ed. ), Language learning online (pp.141-154). Austin, TX: The Daedalus Group Inc.

[20] Kitajima, R., & Lyman-Hager, M. A. (1998). Theory-driven use of digital video in foreign language instruction. CALICO Journal, 16 (1), 37-48.

[21] Krashen, S. (1985). The input hypothesis: Issues and implications. London: Longman.

[22] Labrie, G. (2000). A French vocabulary tutor for the web. CALICO Journal, 17 (3), 475-499.

[23] Lafford, P. A., & Lafford, B. A. (1997). Learning language and culture with the Internet. In R. M. Terry (Ed. ), Technology-enhanced language learning. Lincolnwood, IL: The National Textbook Company.

[24] Liuzhi, Y. (2012). On the applications of multimedia in english teaching in vocational colleges. 2012 International Conference on Education Technology and Management Engineering Lecture Notes in Information Technology, 16, 1-4.

[25] Lee, L. (1998). Going beyond classroom learning: Acquiring cultural knowledge via online newspapers and intercultural exchanges via online chatrooms. CALICO Journal, 16 (2).

[26] Lou, Y., Abrami, P. C., & d'Apollonia, S. (2001). Small group and individual learning with technology: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 71 (3), 449-521.

DOI: 10.3102/00346543071003449

[27] Lyons, L. C. (1995a). Meta-analysis: Methods of accumulating results across research domains [web]. Retrieved December 20, 2001, from http: /www. mnsinc. com/solomon.

[28] Muyskens, J. A. (1998). New ways of learning and teaching: Focus on technology and foreign language education. Boston: Heinle & Heinle.

[29] Madhavaiah G., Nagaraju, Ch., & Peter, S. (2013). Importance of technology in teaching and learning English language. International Journal of Scientific Research and Reviews, 2 (3), 146-154.

[30] Mehrgan, K. (2012).

[31] Nomass, B. B. (2013). The impact of using technology in teaching English as a second language. English Language and Literature Studies, 3 (1), 111-116. Advances in English Linguistics (AEL), 1 (2), 25-29.

DOI: 10.5539/ells.v3n1p111

[32] Nagata, N. (1993). Intelligent computer feedback for second language acquisition. The Modern Language Journal, 77, 330-339.

[33] Nutta, J. (1998). Is computer-based grammar instruction as effective as teacher-directed grammar instruction for teaching L2 structures? CALICO Journal, 16 (1), 49-61.

[34] Omidinia, S., Masrom, M., &Selamat, H. (2013). An examination of the concept of smart school: an innovation to address sustainability. 2nd International Conference on Advances in Computer Science and Engineering, 326-329.

DOI: 10.2991/cse.2013.73

[35] Ong, E. T., & Ruthven, K. (2009), The Effectiveness of Smart Schooling on Students' Attitudes Towards Science. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science, and Technology Education, 5 (1), 35-45.

DOI: 10.12973/ejmste/75255

[36] Patel, C. (2013). Use of multimedia technology in teaching and learning communication skill: an analysis. International Journal of Advancements in Research & Technology, 2 (7), 116-123.

[37] Pellettieri, J. (2000). Negotiation in cyberspace: The role of chatting in the development of grammatical competence. In R. Kern (Ed. ), Network-based language teaching: Concepts and practice (pp.59-86). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

DOI: 10.1017/cbo9781139524735.006

[38] Rostami, S., Akbari, O., & Ghanizadeh, A. (2014).

[39] Serin, O. (2011). The effects of the computer-based instruction on the achievement and problem solving skills of the science and technology students. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 10(1), 183-201.

[40] Sharndama, E. C. (2013). Application of ICTs in teaching and learning English (ELT) in large classes. Journal of Arts and Humanities, 2 (6), 34-39.

[42] Soltani, M. (2012). The structure of smart schools in the educational system. Journal of Basic and Applied Scientific Research, 2 (6), 6250-6254.

[43] Smith, S. M., & Woody, P. C. (2000). Interactive effect of multimedia instruction and learning styles. Teaching of Psychology, 27 (3), 220-223.

DOI: 10.1207/s15328023top2703_10

[44] Salaberry, M. R. (2001). The use of technology for second language learning and teaching: A retrospective. The Modern Language Journal, 85 (1), 39-56.

DOI: 10.1111/0026-7902.00096

[45] Shea, P. (2000). Leveling the playing field: A study of captioned interactive video for second language learning. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 22 (3), 243-263.

DOI: 10.2190/3ney-bnt0-fb28-vbwy

[46] Sinyor, R. (1997). An analysis of student behavior and error sources in an Italian CALL context. CALICO Journal, 14 (2-4), 35-50.

DOI: 10.1558/cj.v14i2-4.51-64

[47] Tsou, W., Wang, W., &Tzeng, Y. (2006). Applying a multimedia storytelling website in foreign language learning. Computers & Education, 47, 17-28.

DOI: 10.1016/j.compedu.2004.08.013

[48] Traore, M., &Blankson, L. K. (2011). Using literature and multiple technologies in ESL instruction. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 2 (3), 561-568.

DOI: 10.4304/jltr.2.3.561-568

[49] Thorton, P., & Dudley, A. (1996). The CALL environment: An alternative to the language lab. CAELL Journal, 7 (4), 29-34.

[50] Warschauer, M. (1998). Researching technology in TESOL: Determinist, instrumental, and critical approaches. TESOL Quarterly, 32 (4), 757-761.

DOI: 10.2307/3588010

[51] Weyers, J. R. (1999). The effects of authentic video on communicative competence. The Modern Language Journal, 83 (3), 339-349.

[52] Walsh, M. (2010). Multimodal literacy: What does it mean for classroom practice?. Australian Journal of Language and Literacy, 33 (3), 211-239.

[53] Wang, S., & Smith, S. (2013). Reading and grammar learning through mobile phones. Language Learning & Technology, 17 (3), 117-134.

Show More Hide