It is shown that if all stars and planets were made out of the same material substance, such as water, for example, then their density of matter, which is conventionally defined as the ratio of their actual mass to an equivalent mass of water, must be taken into account also in the usual radial Newtonian law of gravitation. The idea of equalized mass supports the concept of quantity of matter involving density of matter as well as the bulk/mass that Newton envisaged. It has been proved necessary to explain formerly unexplained experimental results, including discrepancies between predictions based on general theory of relativity (GTR) and actually recorded data. The equalized mass is not meant to turn us back and embrace post-Newtonian theories of gravitation, but to complement the (radial-only by design) GTR for the phenomena that are only partly radial and partly nonradial. A certain new pull-and-twist equation of orbital gravitational interactions is proposed.

Periodical:

International Letters of Chemistry, Physics and Astronomy (Volume 54)

Pages:

112-121

DOI:

10.18052/www.scipress.com/ILCPA.54.112

Citation:

J. Czajko "With Equalized Mass, its Density of Matter can Affect Radial Gravitational Interactions TOO", International Letters of Chemistry, Physics and Astronomy, Vol. 54, pp. 112-121, 2015

Online since:

Jul 2015

Authors:

Distribution:

Open Access

This work is licensed under a

Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License

References:

Newton I. Principia. Edited and commented by Stephen Hawking. Philadelphia: Running Press, 2002, p.1, 321.

Czajko J. On Conjugate Complex Time II: Equipotential Effect of Gravity Retrodicts Differential and Predicts Apparent Anomalous Rotation of the Sun. Chaos, Solitons & Fractals 11 (2000) 2001-(2016).

Czajko J. Galilei was wrong: Angular nonradial effects of radial gravity depend on density of matter. International Letters of Chemistry, Physics and Astronomy 30 (2014) 89-105 http: /www. scipress. com/ILCPA. 30. 89. pdf.

Czajko J. Path-independence of work done theorem is invalid in center-bound force fields. Studies in Mathematical Sciences 7(2) (2013) 25-39 http: /cscanada. net/index. php/sms/article/view/j. sms. 1923845220130702. 2469/5279.

Czajko J. Equipotential energy exchange depends on density of matter. Studies in Mathematical Sciences 7(2) (2013) 40-54 http: /cscanada. net/index. php/sms/article/view/j. sms. 1923845220130702. 2752/5336.

Czajko J. Operationally complete work done suggests presence of potentials corresponding to repulsive forces. International Letters of Chemistry, Physics and Astronomy 37 (2014) 16-30 http: /www. scipress. com/ILCPA. 37. 16. pdf.

Czajko J. On the Intrinsic Gravitational Repulsion. Chaos, Solitons & Fractals 19 (2004) 683700.

Czajko J. Mathematical gateway to complementary hidden variables in macrophysics. International Letters of Chemistry, Physics and Astronomy 50 (2015) 117-142 http: /www. scipress. com/ILCPA. 50. 117. pdf.

Czajko J. Radial and nonradial effects of radial fields in Frenet frame. Applied Physics Research 3(1) (2011) 2-7 http: /www. ccsenet. org/journal/index. php/apr/article/viewFile/9555/7421.

Birkhoff G. (Ed. ) (1973) A source book in classical analysis. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press, p.335, 360.

Kar K.C. Notes on the theory of relativity. Ind. J. Theor. Phys. 17(1) (1969) 1-11.

Kar K.C. & Dutta C. On the theory of relativity. Ind. J. Theor. Phys. 16(1) (1968) 1-6.

Taylor J.G. Do electroweak interactions imply six extra time dimensions? J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 13 (1980) 1861-1866.

Ivashchuk V.D. & Melnikov V.N. Multitemporal Generalization of the Schwarzschild Solution. Int. J. Mod. Phys. D4 (1995) 167-173.

Bars I., Deliduman C. & Minic D. Supersymmetric two-time physics. Phys. Rev. D 59 (1999) 125004-9.

Ord G.N. Fractal space-time: a geometric analogue of relativistic quantum mechanics. J. Phys. Math. Gen. 16 (1983) 1869-1884.

Gubarev, V.V. Multidimensional time and spectral concors of stationary processes. Nonparametric estimates. Russ. Phys. J. 38(9) (1995) 890-893.

Mirman, R. Comments on the dimensionality of time. Found. Phys. 3(3) (1973) 321-333.

Bars I. Standard model of particles and forces in the framework of two-time physics. Phys. Rev. D 74 (2006) 085019.

Bars I. Twistor superstring in two-time physics. Phys. Rev. D 70 (2004) 104022.

Bars I. & Deliduman C. High speed gauge fields and two-time physics. Phys. Rev. D 64 (2001) 045003.

Bars I. Two-time physics in field theory. Phys. Rev. D 62 (2000) 046007.

Bars I., Deliduman C. & Andreev O. Gauged duality, conformal symmetry, and spacetime with two times. Phys. Rev. D 58 (1998) 066004.

Bars I. & Kounnas C. String and particle with two times. Phys. Rev. D 56 (1997) 3664-3671.

Weinberg N.N. On some generalizations of the Lorentz transformation. Phys. Lett. 80A(2-3) (1980) 102-104.

da Costa R.C.T. Constraints in quantum mechanics. Eur. J. Phys. 7 (1986) 269-723.

da Costa R.C.T. Constraints in quantum mechanics. Phys. Rev. A 25 (1982) 2893-2900.

Czajko J. Operational constraints on dimension of space imply both spacetime and timespace. International Letters of Chemistry, Physics and Astronomy 36 (2014) 220-235 http: /www. scipress. com/ILCPA. 36. 220. pdf.

Czajko J. Operational restrictions on morphing of quasi-geometric 4D physical spaces. International Letters of Chemistry, Physics and Astronomy 41 (2015) 45-72 http: /www. scipress. com/ILCPA. 41. 45. pdf.

Fraenkel A.A., Bar-Hillel Y. & Levy A. Foundations of set theory. Amsterdam: NorthHolland, 1973, p.220.

Pasch M. Grundfragen der Geometrie. J. reine angew. Math. 147 (1917) 184-190.

Heyting A. Axiomatic projective geometry. Groningen: Noordhoff, 1980, p.5.

Wang H. Reflections on Kurt Gödel. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, 1987, p.296.

Calder A. Constructive mathematics. Sci. Am. 241 (1979) 146.

Körner S. The philosophy of mathematics. London: Hutchinson Univ. Library, 1960, p.135.

Czajko J. Angular nonradial vs. usual radial potential energy quotient. International Letters of Chemistry, Physics and Astronomy 52 (2015) 172-177 http: /www. scipress. com/ILCPA. 52. 172. pdf.

Czajko J. Linear magnitudes estimated via energy were likely overestimated by over 3. 48%. International Letters of Chemistry, Physics and Astronomy 32 (2014) 32-41 http: /www. scipress. com/ILCPA. 32. 32. pdf.