Paper Titles in Periodical
International Letters of Chemistry, Physics and Astronomy
Volume 53

Subscribe

Subscribe to our Newsletter and get informed about new publication regulary and special discounts for subscribers!

ILCPA > Volume 53 > Variability of Hubble’s Parameter, Geomagnetic...
< Back to Volume

Variability of Hubble’s Parameter, Geomagnetic Activity, and Putative Changes in Space-Mass Density: Implications for Terrestrial Cell Growth

Full Text PDF

Abstract:

The quotient for Planck’s Length divided by the product of Hubble’s parameter and twice the width of the Compton wave length for a proton has been considered a critical increment for the time required for a proton to expand one Planck’s Length. The empirical time of 3.25 ms, found in magnetic field effectiveness for multiple physical and biochemical reactions, requires a local Hubble constant (H) of 58 km·s-1·MPar-1 with a resulting mass density of 0.14 protons per cubic meter. This mass density multiplied by the cube of the galactic orbital velocity is within error measurement of the background photon flux density measured locally by photomultiplier units over the last four years. Regression analyses for the weak positive correlation between Huchra’s annual fluctuations in H and global annual geomagnetic activity over the last 30 years indicated that every 1 nT increase was associated with 0.44 km·s-1·MPar-1 increase in H. The required average density is equivalent to that of the rest mass of the electron. The results and quantitative solutions indicate that the measurement of H is affected by geomagnetic activity and that the time for a proton to expand 1 Planck’s Length can vary over time. Unless earth-based reactions from exposures to pulsed or “quantum well” like magnetic fields that depend upon resonant precision with this value are adjusted appropriately their efficacy could vary significantly.

Info:

Periodical:
International Letters of Chemistry, Physics and Astronomy (Volume 53)
Pages:
137-145
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18052/www.scipress.com/ILCPA.53.137
Citation:
M. A. Persinger "Variability of Hubble’s Parameter, Geomagnetic Activity, and Putative Changes in Space-Mass Density: Implications for Terrestrial Cell Growth", International Letters of Chemistry, Physics and Astronomy, Vol. 53, pp. 137-145, 2015
Online since:
Jul 2015
Authors:
Michael A. Persinger
Keywords:
Background Photon Flux Density, Friedmann’s Equation, Geomagnetic Correlation, Hubble Constant, Proton Expansion
Export:
RIS, BibTeX, Text
Distribution:
Open Access

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License

References:

[1] M. A. Persinger, S. A. Koren. International Journal of Neuroscience 117 (2007) 157-175.

[2] J. Singh, Great Ideas and Theories of Modern Cosmology (1961) Dover, N. Y.

[3] A. D. Aczel, Entanglement: The Greatest Mystery in Physics (2002) Raincoast, Vancouver.

[4] M. A. Persinger, International Letters of Chemistry, Physics and Astronomy 11 (2013) 86-92.

[5] B. T. Dotta, N. J. Murugan, L, M. Karbowski, M. A. Persinger, International Journal of Physical Sciences 8 (2013) 1783-1787.

[6] B. T. Dotta, M. A. Persinger, Journal of Biophysical Chemistry 3 (2012) 72-80.

[7] T. E. DeCoursey, Physiological Reviews 83 (2002) 475-579.

[8] S. A. Koren, B. T. Dotta, M. A. Persinger, The Open Astronomy Journal 7 (2014) 1-6.

[9] M. A. Persinger, R. M. Lafrenie, International Letters of Chemistry, Physics and Astronomy 17 (2014) 67-77.

[10] M. A. Persinger, Journal of Physics, Astrophysics and Physical Cosmology 3 (2009) 1-3.

[11] C. A. Buckner, A. L. Buckner, S. A. Koren, M. A. Persinger, R. M. Lafrenie, PLOS One DOI: 10. 1371 (2015).

[12] J. Huchra, Hubble Estimates, Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics, huchra@cfa. harvard. edu.

[13] D. A. E. Vares, M. A. Persinger, Journal of Non-Locality 2-Nr. 2 (2013) http: /journals. sfu. ca/nonlocality/inded. php/nonlocality/article/view/41/39.

[14] M. A. Persinger, G. F. Lafreniere, B. T. Dotta, International Journal of Geosciences 3 (2012) 627-629.

[15] J. T. Gosling, Physics Fluids B 5 (1993) 2638-2645.

[16] M. A. Persinger, The Open Astronomy Journal 5 (2012) 41-43.

[17] M. A. Persinger, L. S. St-Pierre, International Journal of Geosciences 5 (2014) 450-452.

[18] M. A. Persinger, B. T. Dotta, K. S. Saroka, M. A. Scott, Journal of Consciousness & Research 4 (2013) 1-24.

[19] M. A. Persinger, B. T. Dotta, L. M. Karbowski, N. J. Murugan, FEBS Open Bio 5 (2015) 413-418.

[20] D. E. Winch, D. J. Ivers, J. P. R. Turner, R. J. Stening, Geophysical Journal International, 160 (2005) 487-504.

[21] N. Rouleau, M. A. Persinger, Journal of Electromagnetic Analysis and Applications 7 (2015) 19-30.

[22] L-C. Tu, J. Luo, G. T. Gilles, Reports on Progress in Physics 68 (2005) 77-130.

[23] M. A. El-Borie, S. S. Al-Thoyaib, International Journal of Physical Sciences 1 (2006) 67-74.

[24] Ya. B. Zeldovich, Cosmological fluctuations produced near a singularity. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 192 (1980) 663-667.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/192.4.663

[25] J. Baron, W. C. Campbell, D. DeMille, J. M. Doyle, G. Gabrielse, Y. V. Gurevich, P. W. Hess, et al, Science 343 (2014) 269-272.

[26] M. A. Persinger, S. A. Koren, International Letters of Chemistry, Physics and Astronomy 3 (2015) 106-112.

[27] A. A. Minakov, A. P. Nikoleanko, L. M. Rabinovich, Radiofiziks 35 (1992) 488-497.

[28] B. M. Vladimirskii, Biophysics 40 (1995) 915-923.

[29] T. Quinn, H. Parks, C. Speake, R. Davis, Physical Review Letters 111 (2013) 101102(5).

Show More Hide