@article{pluta2013,
author = {Pluta, Zdzis{\l }aw and Hryniewicz, Tadeusz},
title = {Critics of Existent Theory of Mathematical Pendulum Part 2},
year = {2013},
month = {5},
volume = {13},
pages = {195--204},
journal = {International Letters of Chemistry, Physics and Astronomy},
doi = {10.18052/www.scipress.com/ILCPA.13.195},
keywords = {Mathematical Pendulum, Vibration Period, Amplitude, Angular Velocity, Force of Gravity, Force of Inertia},
abstract = {In the second part of the paper, the thesis is proved to state that the existent theory describes simply a shadow of the rotating apparent mathematical pendulum. Hence, it appears, even that existent description is not sufficiently adequate. Finally, all defects of the theory, which resulted in so inadequate description of the oscillation motion of the simple mathematical pendulum, have been revealed. The necessity to re-build the existent theory has been indicated in the conclusion. Return to the source is to be the first, essential step on the new path of the cognitive action.}
}