Comparative Effectiveness of Inductive Inquiry and Transmitter of Knowledge Models on Secondary School Students’ Achievement on Circle Geometry and Trigonometry

Ihedioha, Silas A.; Osu, Bright O.

doi:10.18052/www.scipress.com/BSMaSS.3.28

BSMaSS > BSMaSS Volume 3 > Comparative Effectiveness of Inductive Inquiry and...

< Back to Volume

Comparative Effectiveness of Inductive Inquiry and Transmitter of Knowledge Models on Secondary School Students’ Achievement on Circle Geometry and Trigonometry

Removed due to plagiarism

Full Text PDF

Abstract:

In this study, the effectiveness of Inductive Inquiry and Transmitter of Knowledge models on students’ academic achievement on Circle Geometry and Trigonometry is explored. The main objectives of the study are to expose the groups to Inductive Inquiry and Transmitter of Knowledge models and compare the effectiveness of these modes of teaching in the teaching of circle geometry and trigonometry. The pre-test-post-test experimental design is chosen for this work. It is hypothesized that there would be significant difference between mean achievement scores of these experimental groups on the post-test. The population of the study consisted of all the students of senior secondary two (SS2) class studying in Govt. Sec. School, Bwari, Federal Capital Territory( FCT) Abuja, Nigeria from which a sample of 60 students is drawn using random sampling technique. They were divided into two groups formed through matching on the basis of their pre-test scores; each group consisting of 30 students. One of the groups is randomly chosen as the Inductive Inquiry group and the other as Transmitter of Knowledge group. The independent variable is mode of teaching and the dependent variable is the academic achievement of students. The dependent variable is measured through a 50-item achievement test items generated using the West African Examination Council’s (WAEC) past questions. These questions are used as both pre-test and post-test items. It is found that Inductive Inquiry group performed better than the Transmitter of Knowledge group. This result may be investigated for further confirmation. It is recommended that Inductive Inquiry model be used by teachers of mathematics while teaching the subject to senior secondary classes. A blend of models may be used because there is no single model that is exclusively best for teaching all the topics at all levels to all students, considering individual differences among students.

Info:

Periodical:

The Bulletin of Society for Mathematical Services and Standards (Volume 3)

Pages:

28-36

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18052/www.scipress.com/BSMaSS.3.28

Citation:

S. A. Ihedioha and B. O. Osu, "Comparative Effectiveness of Inductive Inquiry and Transmitter of Knowledge Models on Secondary School Students’ Achievement on Circle Geometry and Trigonometry", The Bulletin of Society for Mathematical Services and Standards, Vol. 3, pp. 28-36, 2012

Online since:

September 2012

Authors:

Silas A. Ihedioha, Bright O. Osu

Keywords:

Academic Achievement, Effectiveness, Inductive Inquiry, Students, Teaching, Transmitter of Knowledge

Export:

RIS, BibTeX, Text

Distribution:

Open Access

This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License

References:

[1] N.A. Sprinthall and R.C. SprinthallEducational Psychology. New York: McGraw. Hill, Inc.(1990).

[2] N.A. Flanders. Analyzing Teaching Behavior Reading Mass: Addison Wasley.(1970).

[3] Y.K. Singh. Instructional Technology in Education. New Delhi: A.P.H. Publishing Corporation.(2004).

[4] P.H. Martorella). Research on Social Studies Learning and Instructional Cognition: Review of Research in Social Studies Education, 1970-75, Washington, D.C. National Council for the Social Studies. (1977).

[5] P.B. Tyrell. The Effects of Lecture Versus Inquiry Methods of presentation on Student Achievement, A Review of Research: E.R.I.C. Resources in Education Ed. 219307.(1982).

[6] K.A. Hinrichsen and G.Schumburg .Comparative Evaluation of a Joint Lecture –Discussion Approach to U.S History: California, E.R.I.C. Research in Education, 1975, Ed. 108716.

[7] G.C. Schlember. The Effects of An Inquiry Development Program on Elementary School Children Science Learning: Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, New York: E.R.I.C. Research in Education. (1970).

[8] F .Brigham and J.J. Matins. A Synthesis of Empirically Supported Best Practices for Sciences Students with Learning Disabilities: Annual International Conference of Association for the Education of Teachers in Science, Austin T.X. (1999).

[9] H. S. Fogler. Elements of Chemical Reaction Engineering, Prentice Hall: N.J. (1999).

[10] V.K. Rao and R.S. Reddy. Academic Environment: Advice Council and Activities, Commonwealth Publisher: New Delhi,(1992).

[11] M. Prince and R. Felder. The Many Faces of Inductive Teaching and Learning.(2007).

[12] National Institute-Landmark College. (2005). Using Varied Instructional Techniques: Inductive and Deductive Teaching Approaches.

[13] C. Shaffer. A Comparison of Inductive and Deductive Approaches to Teaching Foreign Languages. (1989).

[14] S.Farrell and F.P. Hesketh). An Inductive Approach to Teaching heat and Mass Transfer. 2000. Retrieved March 21.

[15] 2000 fromhttp://www.rowan.edu/colleges/engineering/clinics/asee/papers/2000/farrell01. Pdf.

[16] K.R Rose and C.N. Kwai-Fong. Inductive Deductive Approaches to Teaching Compliments and Compliments Responses.(1997).

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9781139524797.013

[17] A.K. Kalia. Effectiveness of Mastery Learning Strategy and Inquiry Training Model on Pupils Achievement in Science: M.D. University, Rohatak, Directorate of Distance Education.(2005).

[18] N. Pajunen. Deductive and Inductive Approaches in Teaching Singular and Plural Nouns in English. (2007).

Show More Hide

Cited By:

This article has no citations.